Literature DB >> 11326311

Cisplatinum and taxol induce different patterns of p53 phosphorylation.

G Damia1, L Filiberti, F Vikhanskaya, L Carrassa, Y Taya, M D'incalci, M Broggini.   

Abstract

Posttranslational modifications of p53 induced by two widely used anticancer agents, cisplatinum (DDP) and taxol were investigated in two human cancer cell lines. Although both drugs were able to induce phosphorylation at serine 20 (Ser20), only DDP treatment induced p53 phosphorylation at serine 15 (Ser15). Moreover, both drug treatments were able to increase p53 levels and consequently the transcription of waf1 and mdm-2 genes, although DDP treatment resulted in a stronger inducer of both genes. Using two ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) cell lines, the role of ATM in drug-induced p53 phosphorylations was investigated. No differences in drug-induced p53 phosphorylation could be observed, indicating that ATM is not the kinase involved in these phosphorylation events. In addition, inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase activity by wortmannin did not abolish p53 phosphorylation at Ser15 and Ser20, again indicating that DNA-PK is unlikely to be the kinase involved. After both taxol and DDP treatments, an activation of hCHK2 was found and this is likely to be responsible for phosphorylation at Ser20. In contrast, only DDP was able to activate ATR, which is the candidate kinase for phosphorylation of Ser15 by this drug. This data clearly suggests that differential mechanisms are involved in phosphorylation and activation of p53 depending on the drug type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11326311      PMCID: PMC1505020          DOI: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


  43 in total

1.  Phosphorylation of Ser-20 mediates stabilization of human p53 in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  N H Chehab; A Malikzay; E S Stavridi; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Mechanism of action of taxol.

Authors:  S B Horwitz
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 14.819

3.  DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2.

Authors:  A Hirao; Y Y Kong; S Matsuoka; A Wakeham; J Ruland; H Yoshida; D Liu; S J Elledge; T W Mak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The p53 tumor suppressor protein, a modulator of cell proliferation.

Authors:  S J Ullrich; C W Anderson; W E Mercer; E Appella
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-08-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  p53 sites acetylated in vitro by PCAF and p300 are acetylated in vivo in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  L Liu; D M Scolnick; R C Trievel; H B Zhang; R Marmorstein; T D Halazonetis; S L Berger
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53.

Authors:  R S Tibbetts; K M Brumbaugh; J M Williams; J N Sarkaria; W A Cliby; S Y Shieh; Y Taya; C Prives; R T Abraham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Characterization of the adducts produced in DNA by cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and cis-dichloro(ethylenediamine)platinum(II).

Authors:  A Eastman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1983-08-02       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2) phosphorylate p53 at multiple DNA damage-inducible sites.

Authors:  S Y Shieh; J Ahn; K Tamai; Y Taya; C Prives
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53.

Authors:  N H Chehab; A Malikzay; M Appel; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Serine15 phosphorylation stimulates p53 transactivation but does not directly influence interaction with HDM2.

Authors:  N Dumaz; D W Meek
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  23 in total

1.  Ataxia telangiectasia and rad3-related kinase contributes to cell cycle arrest and survival after cisplatin but not oxaliplatin.

Authors:  Kriste A Lewis; Kia K Lilly; Evelyn A Reynolds; William P Sullivan; Scott H Kaufmann; William A Cliby
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  p21-Activated kinase 5 affects cisplatin-induced apoptosis and proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Ding-Guo Zhang; Jinling Zhang; Lin-Lin Mao; Jin-Xia Wu; Wen-Jia Cao; Jun-Nian Zheng; Dong-Sheng Pei
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-01-07

Review 3.  DNA polymerase eta and chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  Kai-ming Chou
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  The impact of S- and G2-checkpoint response on the fidelity of G1-arrest by cisplatin and its comparison to a non-cross-resistant platinum(IV) analog.

Authors:  Guangan He; Jian Kuang; Abdul R Khokhar; Zahid H Siddik
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  p53-induced apoptosis occurs in the absence of p14(ARF) in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Sally Hopkins-Donaldson; Larisa L Belyanskaya; Ana Paula Simões-Wüst; Brigitte Sigrist; Stefanie Kurtz; Uwe Zangemeister-Wittke; Rolf Stahel
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Silencing of high-mobility group box 2 (HMGB2) modulates cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Nazia Syed; Sandip Chavan; Nandini A Sahasrabuddhe; Santosh Renuse; Gajanan Sathe; Vishalakshi Nanjappa; Aneesha Radhakrishnan; Remya Raja; Sneha M Pinto; Anand Srinivasan; T S Keshava Prasad; Kotteazeth Srikumar; Harsha Gowda; Vani Santosh; David Sidransky; Joseph A Califano; Akhilesh Pandey; Aditi Chatterjee
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Knock down of p53 or its ubiquitin ligase E6AP does not affect the sensitivity of human papillomavirus-positive cervical cancer cells to cisplatin.

Authors:  Olga Michnov; Erich Solomayer; Tanja Fehm; Frank Stubenrauch; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Cisplatin associated with LY294002 increases cytotoxicity and induces changes in transcript profiles of glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  P O Carminati; F S Donaires; M M Marques; E A Donadi; G A S Passos; E T Sakamoto-Hojo
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Mechanisms of Cisplatin-Induced Apoptosis and of Cisplatin Sensitivity: Potential of BIN1 to Act as a Potent Predictor of Cisplatin Sensitivity in Gastric Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanida; Tsutomu Mizoshita; Keiji Ozeki; Hironobu Tsukamoto; Takeshi Kamiya; Hiromi Kataoka; Daitoku Sakamuro; Takashi Joh
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-06-12

10.  Hypoxia-induced cytotoxic drug resistance in osteosarcoma is independent of HIF-1Alpha.

Authors:  Jennifer Adamski; Andrew Price; Caroline Dive; Guy Makin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.