Literature DB >> 21592546

The impact of S- and G2-checkpoint response on the fidelity of G1-arrest by cisplatin and its comparison to a non-cross-resistant platinum(IV) analog.

Guangan He1, Jian Kuang, Abdul R Khokhar, Zahid H Siddik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cisplatin is a DNA-damaging antitumor agent that is highly effective in treating ovarian cancer. It activates the p53/p21 pathway for its cytotoxic mode of action, but it does not induce p21-dependent cell cycle arrest in G1. Therefore, we investigated this paradox, and used the model analog DAP as a positive control for p21-dependent G1-arrest.
METHODS: Studies were conducted in p53-proficient ovarian A2780 tumor cells to examine Cdk activity, cell cycle distribution and DNA damage signaling after cisplatin or DAP in combination with the mitotic inhibitor nocodazole.
RESULTS: Cisplatin consistently induced transient S-phase arrest by inhibiting Cdk2/cyclin A complex in S-phase at 12 h and then a durable G2/M-arrest by inhibiting Cdc2/cyclin B complex at 12-18 h. These inhibitions were associated with Chk1 and Chk2 activation and resultant increase in inhibitory tyrosine phosphorylation of Cdk2 and Cdc2. Cisplatin also potently inhibited G1-phase Cdk4/cyclin D1 and Cdk2/cyclin E activities at ~18 h. In agreement, exposure of cisplatin-treated A2780, HCT-116(p53-/-) and HCT-116(p21-/-) tumor cells to nocodazole revealed limited G1-arrest that was dependent on p53 and p21. In contrast, the durable G1-arrest by DAP, which failed to activate Chk1 and Chk2, was unaffected by nocodazole.
CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin induced G1-arrest, but at an attenuated level. This was primarily due to orchestration of Cdk inhibition in S-phase first, then in G2, and finally in G1 that effectively blocked cells in G2 and prevented cells from progressing and arresting in G1. These studies demonstrate that cisplatin unequivocally activates G1-checkpoint response, but the fidelity of G1-arrest is compromised by Chk1/2 activation and checkpoint response in S- and G2/M-phase.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21592546      PMCID: PMC3601787          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  49 in total

1.  The cell cycle inhibitor p21waf1 binds to the myc and cdc25A promoters upon DNA damage and induces transcriptional repression.

Authors:  Arnaud Vigneron; Julia Cherier; Benjamin Barré; Erick Gamelin; Olivier Coqueret
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  A novel indolocarbazole, ICP-1, abrogates DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest and enhances cytotoxicity: similarities and differences to the cell cycle checkpoint abrogator UCN-01.

Authors:  Alan Eastman; Ethan A Kohn; Mary Kay Brown; Joerg Rathman; Mark Livingstone; David H Blank; Gordon W Gribble
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 3.  Regulation of Cdc2 activity by phosphorylation at T14/Y15.

Authors:  L D Berry; K L Gould
Journal:  Prog Cell Cycle Res       Date:  1996

4.  Relationship between radiation-induced G1 phase arrest and p53 function in human tumor cells.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; C Y Li; C G Maki; A C Imrich; J B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Bimodal effects of 1R,2R-diaminocyclohexane(trans-diacetato)(dichloro)platinum(IV) on cell cycle checkpoints.

Authors:  J Kuang; G He; Z Huang; A R Khokhar; Z H Siddik
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  The decision to enter mitosis.

Authors:  W G Dunphy
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 20.808

7.  Relationships between cdc2 kinase, DNA cross-linking, and cell cycle perturbations induced by nitrogen mustard.

Authors:  P M O'Connor; D K Ferris; G A White; J Pines; T Hunter; D L Longo; K W Kohn
Journal:  Cell Growth Differ       Date:  1992-01

Review 8.  Cell cycle checkpoints and their impact on anticancer therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Alan Eastman
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 4.429

9.  A comparative study of p53 gene mutations, protein accumulation, and response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  S C Righetti; G Della Torre; S Pilotti; S Ménard; F Ottone; M I Colnaghi; M A Pierotti; C Lavarino; M Cornarotti; S Oriana; S Böhm; G L Bresciani; G Spatti; F Zunino
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  The role of apoptosis in cell killing by cisplatin: a flow cytometric study.

Authors:  M G Ormerod; R M Orr; J H Peacock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  27 in total

1.  Association of Sp1 and survivin in epithelial ovarian cancer: Sp1 inhibitor and cisplatin, a novel combination for inhibiting epithelial ovarian cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Umesh T Sankpal; Susan B Ingersoll; Sarfraz Ahmad; Robert W Holloway; Vadiraja B Bhat; Jerry W Simecka; Liz Daniel; Ekamber Kariali; Jamboor K Vishwanatha; Riyaz Basha
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-08-31

2.  Functional Activation of Mutant p53 by Platinum Analogues in Cisplatin-Resistant Cells Is Dependent on Phosphorylation.

Authors:  Xiaolei Xie; Guangan He; Zahid H Siddik
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.852

3.  Inhibition of DNA Synthesis by a Platinum-Acridine Hybrid Agent Leads to Potent Cell Kill in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher L Smyre; Gilda Saluta; Timothy E Kute; Gregory L Kucera; Ulrich Bierbach
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Cisplatin in Combination with MDM2 Inhibition Downregulates Rad51 Recombinase in a Bimodal Manner to Inhibit Homologous Recombination and Augment Tumor Cell Kill.

Authors:  Xiaolei Xie; Guangan He; Zahid H Siddik
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 may be expressed as multiple proteins and have functions that are independent of binding to CCND and RB and occur at the S and G 2/M phases of the cell cycle.

Authors:  Yuan Sun; Xiaomin Lou; Min Yang; Chengfu Yuan; Ling Ma; Bing-Kun Xie; Jian-Min Wu; Wei Yang; Steven Xj Shen; Ningzhi Xu; D Joshua Liao
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Protein expression profiling identifies differential modulation of homologous recombination by platinum-based antitumor agents.

Authors:  Guangan He; Xiaolei Xie; Zahid H Siddik
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Cisplatin plus sodium arsenite and hyperthermia induces pseudo-G1 associated apoptotic cell death in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Clarisse S Muenyi; Abhaya P Trivedi; C William Helm; J Christopher States
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Recent developments in texaphyrin chemistry and drug discovery.

Authors:  Christian Preihs; Jonathan F Arambula; Darren Magda; Heeyeong Jeong; Dongwon Yoo; Jinwoo Cheon; Zahid H Siddik; Jonathan L Sessler
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  A texaphyrin-oxaliplatin conjugate that overcomes both pharmacologic and molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance in cancer cells.

Authors:  Jonathan F Arambula; Jonathan L Sessler; Zahid H Siddik
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.597

10.  Induction of apoptotic effects of anti-proliferative zeolite X from coal fly ash on cervical cancer (HeLa) cell lines.

Authors:  S Subhapriya; P Gomathipriya
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.