Literature DB >> 11323164

Recent developments in regulatory requirements for developmental toxicology.

C A Kimmel1, S L Makris.   

Abstract

A number of legislative and regulatory changes have occurred over the past 5 years to prompt the re-evaluation of the regulatory requirements for developmental toxicity testing and use of the data for risk assessment. In particular, passage of the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) in the United States required the USEPA to evaluate children's health risks in a more rigorous fashion, and to apply an additional 10-fold safety factor if data were inadequate or children appeared to be more sensitive than adults. A review of the testing protocols required by USEPA led to extension of the dosing period to term in the prenatal developmental toxicity study and the addition of endpoints to the 2-generation reproduction study protocol as indicators of possible neurologic, reproductive, or immune alterations. Revised testing guidelines for pesticides and toxic substances were published by USEPA in 1998, including a developmental neurotoxicity testing protocol. Further review for FQPA implementation resulted in the proposal for a core set of required toxicology studies, including routine developmental neurotoxicity, adult neurotoxicity, and adult immunotoxicity studies. In addition, development of new testing guidelines in several areas was recommended, these guidelines to be used in conjunction with or as follow-up when indicated from standard testing: developmental immunotoxicity, carcinogenesis, specialized neurotoxicity studies, endocrine disruptor studies, pharmacokinetics, and direct dosing of neonates. The impact of these efforts on the policies for toxicity testing of pesticides are discussed, and these issues are currently being reviewed on a broader scale, in particular, by evaluating the adequacy of the methods used for reference values (e.g. chronic RfD, RfC). Three major areas of focus for this review include life stages evaluated, endpoints assessed, and the duration of exposure used in various studies. A major focus of these efforts is to ensure that children's health risks are being adequately addressed in the risk assessment process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11323164     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4274(01)00309-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  6 in total

Review 1.  Developing novel in vitro methods for the risk assessment of developmental and placental toxicants in the environment.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fry; Jacqueline Bangma; John Szilagyi; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Identification and Profiling of Environmental Chemicals That Inhibit the TGFβ/SMAD Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Zhengxi Wei; Srilatha Sakamuru; Li Zhang; Jinghua Zhao; Ruili Huang; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Yanling Chen; Yan Shu; Thomas B Knudsen; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Developmental pesticide models of the Parkinson disease phenotype.

Authors:  Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Mona Thiruchelvam; Brian K Barlow; Eric K Richfield
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Preconception brief: occupational/environmental exposures.

Authors:  Melissa A McDiarmid; Kim Gehle
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-08-08

5.  Developmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls interferes with experience-dependent dendritic plasticity and ryanodine receptor expression in weanling rats.

Authors:  Dongren Yang; Kyung Ho Kim; Andrew Phimister; Adam D Bachstetter; Thomas R Ward; Robert W Stackman; Ronald F Mervis; Amy B Wisniewski; Sabra L Klein; Prasada Rao S Kodavanti; Kim A Anderson; Gary Wayman; Isaac N Pessah; Pamela J Lein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Hazard identification and predictability of children's health risk from animal data.

Authors:  LaRonda L Morford; Judith W Henck; William J Breslin; John M DeSesso
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.