Literature DB >> 11320639

The effects of voluntary contraction intensity and gender on perceived exertion during isokinetic quadriceps exercise.

D M Pincivero1, A J Coelho, R M Campy, Y Salfetnikov, A Bright.   

Abstract

The objectives of the present study were to: (1) examine perceived exertion across different target voluntary contraction intensities, (2) compare perceived exertion ratings with actual target intensities, and (3) compare perceived exertion ratings between males and females. The subjects for this study included 30 healthy, college-aged male (n = 15) and female (n = 15) volunteers. All subjects were free of orthopedic, cardiopulmonary, systemic and neurological disease. Each subject completed five maximal isokinetic, concentric quadriceps contractions in a seated position at 60 degrees.s-1 to determine their single, highest peak torque. All subjects then completed, in a random order, 3-5 submaximal isokinetic contractions at 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of their single, highest peak torque. Each relative contraction level (i.e., percentage) was achieved by having the subjects attempt to match the peak of their torque curve to a horizontal line on a computer monitor. Perceived exertion was measured by asking the subjects to provide a number that corresponded to the feelings in their quadriceps during exercise by viewing a modified category-ratio (CR-10) scale. The results of a two-factor (gender x intensity) analysis of variance revealed a significant, intensity main effect (F8,232 = 92.19, P < 0.001, eta 2 = 0.77, 1 - beta = 0.99) and no significant gender main effect (F8,232 = 2.66, P = 0.11, eta 2 = 0.09, 1 - beta = 0.35) or interactions (F8,232 = 1.01, P = 0.43, eta 2 = 0.04, 1 - beta = 0.46). The findings of this study demonstrate that perceived exertion is significantly (P < 0.05) different from the specific target values on the CR-10 scale at 10%, and 50-90% maximum voluntary contraction. The results revealed that the increase in perceived exertion across the contraction intensities could be fit to both linear (F1,29 = 205.41, P < 0.001, eta 2 = 0.88, 1 - beta = 0.99) and quadratic (F1,29 = 10.05, P = 0.004, eta 2 = 0.26, 1 - beta = 0.87) trends. These findings suggest that perceived exertion is underestimated during submaximal isokinetic exercise, and is not different between males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11320639     DOI: 10.1007/s004210170008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  15 in total

1.  Perceived exertion is elevated in old age during an isometric fatigue task.

Authors:  Brian L Allman; Charles L Rice
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Perceived exertion and maximal quadriceps femoris muscle strength during dynamic knee extension exercise in young adult males and females.

Authors:  Danny M Pincivero; Alan J Coelho; Robert M Campy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Submaximal force production during perceptually guided isometric exercise.

Authors:  Sacha J West; Lynne Smith; Estelle V Lambert; Timothy D Noakes; Alan St Clair Gibson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The effect of arm abduction angle and contraction intensity on perceived exertion.

Authors:  Mark K Timmons; Staci M Stevens; Danny M Pincivero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Construct and concurrent validation of a new resistance intensity scale for exercise with thera-band® elastic bands.

Authors:  Juan C Colado; Xavier Garcia-Masso; N Travis Triplett; Joaquin Calatayud; Jorge Flandez; David Behm; Michael E Rogers
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Development and validity of a scale of perception of velocity in resistance exercise.

Authors:  Iker J Bautista; Ignacio J Chirosa; Luis J Chirosa; Ignacio Martín; Andrés González; Robert J Robertson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Concurrent and Construct Validation of a New Scale for Rating Perceived Exertion during Elastic Resistance Training in The Elderly.

Authors:  Juan C Colado; Guilherme E Furtado; Ana M Teixeira; Jorge Flandez; Fernando Naclerio
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Sex differences in muscular load among house painters performing identical work tasks.

Authors:  Jacob Meyland; Thomas Heilskov-Hansen; Tine Alkjær; Henrik Koblauch; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Susanne Wulff Svendsen; Jane Frølund Thomsen; Gert-Åke Hansson; Erik B Simonsen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Relationship between the rating of perceived exertion scale and the load intensity of resistance training.

Authors:  Shinichiro Morishita; Atsuhiro Tsubaki; Tomoya Takabayashi; Jack B Fu
Journal:  Strength Cond J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Relationships between maximum holding time and ratings of pain and exertion differ for static and dynamic tasks.

Authors:  Laura A Frey Law; Jennifer E Lee; Tara R McMullen; Ting Xia
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.