Literature DB >> 19184084

The effect of arm abduction angle and contraction intensity on perceived exertion.

Mark K Timmons1, Staci M Stevens, Danny M Pincivero.   

Abstract

The objective of the present investigation was to examine the effects of voluntary contraction intensity and arm elevation angle on ratings of perceived exertion in healthy young adults. Twelve healthy young adults participated in six separate experimental sessions, during which maximal and sub-maximal arm abduction contractions were performed at one of the following randomly assigned arm angles: 15 degrees , 30 degrees , 45 degrees , 60 degrees , 75 degrees , and 90 degrees arm angles (degrees). The sub-maximal arm abduction contractions (10 s) were performed to target intensities ranging from 10 to 90% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), in randomly ordered 10% increments. Perceived exertion was sampled with a modified Borg category-ratio scale immediately, following each sub-maximal contraction. Voluntary arm abduction torque was significantly (p < 0.05) lower at 45 degrees , 60 degrees , 75 degrees and 90 degrees , as compared to 15 degrees . The ratings of perceived exertion increased significantly (p < 0.05) across the range of contraction intensities, with no significant differences between arm angles. The perceived exertion response, as a function of contraction intensity, was best described as linear across the 30 degrees -90 degrees , while a power function described the response at 15 degrees . The major findings demonstrated that arm position plays a minimal role in mediating the growth in the perceived exertion response, as a function of contraction intensity.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184084     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-0992-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  28 in total

1.  The effects of joint angle and reliability on knee proprioception.

Authors:  D M Pincivero; B Bachmeier; A J Coelho
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Secondary impingement in the shoulder. An improved terminology in impingement.

Authors:  A K Belling Sørensen; U Jørgensen
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  The effect of extraneous movements on peak torque and constant joint angle torque-velocity curves.

Authors:  J P Weir; S A Evans; M L Housh
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Effect of viewing the RPE scale on the ability to make ratings of perceived exertion.

Authors:  B R Abadie
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1996-08

Review 5.  Perception of physical exertion: methods, mediators, and applications.

Authors:  R J Robertson; B J Noble
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.230

6.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study.

Authors:  J P Roll; J P Vedel; E Ribot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceived exertion during isometric quadriceps contraction. A comparison between men and women.

Authors:  D M Pincivero; A J Coelho; W H Erikson
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Effect of shoulder angle on physiological responses during incremental peak arm crank ergometry.

Authors:  Anthony S Leicht; Warwick L Spinks
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  Gender differences in perceived exertion during fatiguing knee extensions.

Authors:  Danny M Pincivero; Alan J Coelho; Robert M Campy
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Relationship between the rating of perceived exertion scale and the load intensity of resistance training.

Authors:  Shinichiro Morishita; Atsuhiro Tsubaki; Tomoya Takabayashi; Jack B Fu
Journal:  Strength Cond J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Relationship between Isometric Muscle Force and Fractal Dimension of Surface Electromyogram.

Authors:  Matteo Beretta-Piccoli; Gennaro Boccia; Tessa Ponti; Ron Clijsen; Marco Barbero; Corrado Cescon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Convergent Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Resistance Exercise in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  John W D Lea; Jamie M O'Driscoll; Sabina Hulbert; James Scales; Jonathan D Wiles
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.