Literature DB >> 11320221

Y chromosome polymorphism is a strong determinant of male fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

A K Chippindale1, W R Rice.   

Abstract

In many species, the Y (or W) chromosome carries relatively few functional genes. This observation motivates the null hypothesis that the Y will be a minor contributor to genetic variation for fitness. Previous data and theory supported the null hypothesis, but evidence presented here shows that the Y of Drosophila melanogaster is a major determinant of a male's total fitness, with standing genetic variation estimated to be 68% of that of an entire X/autosome genomic haplotype. Most Y-linked genes are expressed during spermatogenesis, and correspondingly, we found that the Y influences fitness primarily through its effect on a male's reproductive success (sperm competition and/or mating success) rather than his egg-to-adult viability. But the fitness of a Y highly depended on the genetic makeup of its bearer, reverting from high to low in different genetic backgrounds. This pattern leads to large epistatic (inconsistent among backgrounds) but no additive (consistent among backgrounds) Y-linked genetic variance for fitness. On a microevolutionary scale, the observed large epistatic variation on the Y substantially reduces heritable variation for fitness among males, and on a macroevolutionary scale, the Y produces strong selection for genomic rearrangements that move interacting genes onto the nonrecombining region of the Y.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11320221      PMCID: PMC33272          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.101456898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  Population genetic implications from sequence variation in four Y chromosome genes.

Authors:  P Shen; F Wang; P A Underhill; C Franco; W H Yang; A Roxas; R Sung; A A Lin; R W Hyman; D Vollrath; R W Davis; L L Cavalli-Sforza; P J Oefner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nontransitivity of sperm precedence in Drosophila.

Authors:  A G Clark; E T Dermitzakis; A Civetta
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The molecular through ecological genetics of abnormal abdomen. IV. Components of genetic variation in a natural population of Drosophila mercatorum.

Authors:  H Hollocher; A R Templeton; R DeSalle; J S Johnston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The Sex-Determining Mechanism of Drosophila Miranda.

Authors:  R H Macknight
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1939-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Drosophila Miranda, a New Species.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1935-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome.

Authors:  B T Lahn; D C Page
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Lack of nucleotide polymorphism in the Y-linked sperm flagellar dynein gene Dhc-Yh3 of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  M Zurovcova; W F Eanes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Retroposition of autosomal mRNA yielded testis-specific gene family on human Y chromosome.

Authors:  B T Lahn; D C Page
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Y-chromosome effects on Drosophila geotaxis interact with genetic or cytoplasmic background.

Authors:  S F Stoltenberg; J Hirsch
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.

Authors:  A K Chippindale; J R Gibson; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  60 in total

1.  Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes.

Authors:  Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mating with large males decreases the immune defence of females in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Imroze; N G Prasad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bedhomme; Adam K Chippindale; N G Prasad; Matthieu Delcourt; Jessica K Abbott; Martin A Mallet; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Resolving intralocus sexual conflict: genetic mechanisms and time frame.

Authors:  Andrew D Stewart; Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Y not a dead end: epistatic interactions between Y-linked regulatory polymorphisms and genetic background affect global gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Pan-Pan Jiang; Daniel L Hartl; Bernardo Lemos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Epigenetic effects of polymorphic Y chromosomes modulate chromatin components, immune response, and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Bernardo Lemos; Alan T Branco; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Intergenomic epistasis for fitness: within-population interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Damian K Dowling; Urban Friberg; Frank Hailer; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Maternal inheritance, epigenetics and the evolution of polyandry.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh; David W Zeh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Autosomal variation for male body size and sperm competition phenotypes is uncorrelated in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Linda Amah; Anthony C Fiumera
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Matrilineal inheritance of a key mediator of prenatal maternal effects.

Authors:  Barbara Tschirren; Ann-Kathrin Ziegler; Joel L Pick; Monika Okuliarová; Michal Zeman; Mathieu Giraudeau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.