P Tornetta1, J E Spoo, F A Reynolds, C Lee. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Massachusetts 02118, USA. ptornetta@pol.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many surgeons and orthopaedic references recommend that fixation of a disrupted distal tibiofibular syndesmosis be performed with the ankle in dorsiflexion to avoid overtightening and subsequent restriction of ankle dorsiflexion. This recommendation is based in large part on one cadaveric study without clinical correlation. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether overtightening of the syndesmosis limits maximal ankle dorsiflexion. METHODS: Nineteen cadaveric ankles were used for the study. Each ankle was tested for the initial range of motion after release of the Achilles tendon proximal to the ankle joint. All capsular and ligamentous structures remained intact. Kirschner wires were placed in the tibia and talus. The angle between the wires with the ankle maximally dorsiflexed was measured before and after syndesmotic compression. Syndesmotic compression was achieved with a 4.5-mm lag screw with the ankle in plantar flexion. RESULTS: There was no difference between the values for maximal dorsiflexion before and after syndesmotic compression. CONCLUSIONS: Syndesmotic compression in and of itself does not diminish ankle dorsiflexion in a cadaveric model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maximal dorsiflexion of the ankle during syndesmotic fixation is not required in order to avoid loss of dorsiflexion. It is likely that the most important aspect of syndesmotic fixation is anatomic reduction of the syndesmosis and that the degree of ankle dorsiflexion during fixation is not important.
BACKGROUND: Many surgeons and orthopaedic references recommend that fixation of a disrupted distal tibiofibular syndesmosis be performed with the ankle in dorsiflexion to avoid overtightening and subsequent restriction of ankle dorsiflexion. This recommendation is based in large part on one cadaveric study without clinical correlation. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether overtightening of the syndesmosis limits maximal ankle dorsiflexion. METHODS: Nineteen cadaveric ankles were used for the study. Each ankle was tested for the initial range of motion after release of the Achilles tendon proximal to the ankle joint. All capsular and ligamentous structures remained intact. Kirschner wires were placed in the tibia and talus. The angle between the wires with the ankle maximally dorsiflexed was measured before and after syndesmotic compression. Syndesmotic compression was achieved with a 4.5-mm lag screw with the ankle in plantar flexion. RESULTS: There was no difference between the values for maximal dorsiflexion before and after syndesmotic compression. CONCLUSIONS: Syndesmotic compression in and of itself does not diminish ankle dorsiflexion in a cadaveric model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maximal dorsiflexion of the ankle during syndesmotic fixation is not required in order to avoid loss of dorsiflexion. It is likely that the most important aspect of syndesmotic fixation is anatomic reduction of the syndesmosis and that the degree of ankle dorsiflexion during fixation is not important.
Authors: Christopher T Cosgrove; Amanda G Spraggs-Hughes; Sara M Putnam; William M Ricci; Anna N Miller; Christopher M McAndrew; Michael J Gardner Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Graham A McCollum; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; James D F Calder; C Niek van Dijk Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-10-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Steven M Cherney; Jacob A Haynes; Amanda G Spraggs-Hughes; Christopher M McAndrew; William M Ricci; Michael J Gardner Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Sara M Putnam; Michael S Linn; Amanda Spraggs-Hughes; Christopher M McAndrew; William M Ricci; Michael J Gardner Journal: Injury Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Anna N Miller; Eben A Carroll; Robert J Parker; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Francesco Pogliacomi; Massimo De Filippo; Daniele Casalini; Alberto Longhi; Fabrizio Tacci; Rocco Perotta; Francesco Pagnini; Silvio Tocco; Francesco Ceccarelli Journal: World J Orthop Date: 2021-05-18