OBJECTIVE: To derive and test a series of brief diagnosis-specific scales to identify subjects who are at high probability of meeting diagnostic criteria and those who may safely be spared more extensive diagnostic inquiry. METHOD: Secondary data analysis of a large epidemiological data set (n = 1,286) produced a series of gate and contingent items for each diagnosis. Findings were replicated in a second retrospective analysis from a residential care sample (n = 884). The DISC Predictive Scales (DPS) were then used prospectively as a self-report questionnaire in two studies, in which parents (n = 128) and/or adolescents (n = 208) had subsequent diagnostic interviewing with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children or the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children. RESULTS: All analyses showed that gate item selection was valid and that any missed cases were due solely to inconsistent reports on the same questions. Screening performance of the full scales was shown to be good, and substantial reductions in scale length were not associated with significant changes in discriminatory power. CONCLUSIONS: The DPS can accurately determine subjects who can safely be spared further diagnostic inquiry in any diagnostic area. This has the potential to speed up structured diagnostic interviewing considerably. The full DPS can be used to screen accurately for cases of specific DSM-III-R disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To derive and test a series of brief diagnosis-specific scales to identify subjects who are at high probability of meeting diagnostic criteria and those who may safely be spared more extensive diagnostic inquiry. METHOD: Secondary data analysis of a large epidemiological data set (n = 1,286) produced a series of gate and contingent items for each diagnosis. Findings were replicated in a second retrospective analysis from a residential care sample (n = 884). The DISC Predictive Scales (DPS) were then used prospectively as a self-report questionnaire in two studies, in which parents (n = 128) and/or adolescents (n = 208) had subsequent diagnostic interviewing with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children or the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children. RESULTS: All analyses showed that gate item selection was valid and that any missed cases were due solely to inconsistent reports on the same questions. Screening performance of the full scales was shown to be good, and substantial reductions in scale length were not associated with significant changes in discriminatory power. CONCLUSIONS: The DPS can accurately determine subjects who can safely be spared further diagnostic inquiry in any diagnostic area. This has the potential to speed up structured diagnostic interviewing considerably. The full DPS can be used to screen accurately for cases of specific DSM-III-R disorders.
Authors: Susan D Phillips; Teresa L Kramer; Scott N Compton; Barbara J Burns; James M Robbins Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Michael S Robbins; Daniel J Feaster; Viviana E Horigian; Michael Rohrbaugh; Varda Shoham; Ken Bachrach; Michael Miller; Kathleen A Burlew; Candy Hodgkins; Ibis Carrion; Nancy Vandermark; Eric Schindler; Robert Werstlein; José Szapocznik Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2011-10-03
Authors: Lindsay M Squeglia; Scott F Sorg; Alecia Dager Schweinsburg; Reagan R Wetherill; Carmen Pulido; Susan F Tapert Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Guillermo Prado; David Cordova; Shi Huang; Yannine Estrada; Alexa Rosen; Guadalupe A Bacio; Giselle Leon Jimenez; Hilda Pantin; C Hendricks Brown; Maria-Rosa Velazquez; Juan Villamar; Derek Freitas; Maria I Tapia; Kathryn McCollister Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-07-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: C L M Joseph; S L Havstad; D Johnson; J Saltzgaber; E L Peterson; K Resnicow; D R Ownby; A P Baptist; C C Johnson; V J Strecher Journal: J Asthma Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: John M Brehm; Sima K Ramratnam; Sze Man Tse; Damien C Croteau-Chonka; Maria Pino-Yanes; Christian Rosas-Salazar; Augusto A Litonjua; Benjamin A Raby; Nadia Boutaoui; Yueh-Ying Han; Wei Chen; Erick Forno; Anna L Marsland; Nicole R Nugent; Celeste Eng; Angel Colón-Semidey; María Alvarez; Edna Acosta-Pérez; Melissa L Spear; Fernando D Martinez; Lydiana Avila; Scott T Weiss; Manuel Soto-Quiros; Carole Ober; Dan L Nicolae; Kathleen C Barnes; Robert F Lemanske; Robert C Strunk; Andrew Liu; Stephanie J London; Frank Gilliland; Patrick Sleiman; Michael March; Hakon Hakonarson; Qing Ling Duan; Jay K Kolls; Gregory K Fritz; Donglei Hu; Negar Fani; Jennifer S Stevens; Lynn M Almli; Esteban G Burchard; Jaemin Shin; Elizabeth L McQuaid; Kerry Ressler; Glorisa Canino; Juan C Celedón Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405