BACKGROUND: The ability to identify potentially resistant participants early in the course of an intervention could inform development of strategies for behavior change and improve program effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to identify factors related to nonresponse (i.e., lack of behavior change) to an asthma management intervention for urban teenagers. The intervention targeted several behaviors, including medication adherence, having a rescue inhaler nearby, and smoking. METHODS: A discriminate analysis was conducted using data from a randomized trial of the intervention. Included in this analysis are participants who reported a physician diagnosis of asthma, completed a baseline questionnaire, were randomized to the treatment group, completed >or=2 of 4 educational sessions, and completed >or=2 of 3 follow-up questionnaires. Ninety students met criteria for inclusion in this subgroup analysis. RESULTS: In logistic regression models for medication adherence, nonresponse was related to low baseline asthma self-regulation, odds ratio = 3.6 (95% confidence interval = 1.3-9.5). In models for having an inhaler nearby, nonresponse was related to low baseline self-regulation and to rebelliousness, OR = 4.7 (1.6-13.2) and 5.6 (1.7-18.0), respectively. Nonresponse to smoking messages was related to rebelliousness, low emotional support, and low religiosity, ORs = 7.6 (1.8-32.3), 9.5 (1.4-63.5), and 6.6 (1.5-29.8) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Certain variables had the ability to discriminate the likelihood of response from that of nonresponse to an asthma program for urban, African American adolescents with asthma. These variables can be used to identify resistant subgroups early in the intervention, allowing the application of specialized strategies through tailoring. These types of analyses can inform behavioral interventions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The ability to identify potentially resistant participants early in the course of an intervention could inform development of strategies for behavior change and improve program effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to identify factors related to nonresponse (i.e., lack of behavior change) to an asthma management intervention for urban teenagers. The intervention targeted several behaviors, including medication adherence, having a rescue inhaler nearby, and smoking. METHODS: A discriminate analysis was conducted using data from a randomized trial of the intervention. Included in this analysis are participants who reported a physician diagnosis of asthma, completed a baseline questionnaire, were randomized to the treatment group, completed >or=2 of 4 educational sessions, and completed >or=2 of 3 follow-up questionnaires. Ninety students met criteria for inclusion in this subgroup analysis. RESULTS: In logistic regression models for medication adherence, nonresponse was related to low baseline asthma self-regulation, odds ratio = 3.6 (95% confidence interval = 1.3-9.5). In models for having an inhaler nearby, nonresponse was related to low baseline self-regulation and to rebelliousness, OR = 4.7 (1.6-13.2) and 5.6 (1.7-18.0), respectively. Nonresponse to smoking messages was related to rebelliousness, low emotional support, and low religiosity, ORs = 7.6 (1.8-32.3), 9.5 (1.4-63.5), and 6.6 (1.5-29.8) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Certain variables had the ability to discriminate the likelihood of response from that of nonresponse to an asthma program for urban, African American adolescents with asthma. These variables can be used to identify resistant subgroups early in the intervention, allowing the application of specialized strategies through tailoring. These types of analyses can inform behavioral interventions.
Authors: C P Lucas; H Zhang; P W Fisher; D Shaffer; D A Regier; W E Narrow; K Bourdon; M K Dulcan; G Canino; M Rubio-Stipec; B B Lahey; P Friman Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Jo Anne Grunbaum; Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; James Ross; Joseph Hawkins; Richard Lowry; William A Harris; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Janet Collins Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2004-05-21
Authors: Laura D Kubzansky; Jeff C Huffman; Julia K Boehm; Rosalba Hernandez; Eric S Kim; Hayami K Koga; Emily H Feig; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Martin E P Seligman; Darwin R Labarthe Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jeffery C Huffman; Ariana M Albanese; Kirsti A Campbell; Christopher M Celano; Rachel A Millstein; Carol A Mastromauro; Brian C Healy; Wei-Jean Chung; James L Januzzi; Linda M Collins; Elyse R Park Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Helen C Kales; Laura N Gitlin; Barbara Stanislawski; Katherine Marx; Molly Turnwald; Daphne C Watkins; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2017 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Christine L M Joseph; Dennis R Ownby; Suzanne L Havstad; Jacqueline Saltzgaber; Shannon Considine; Dayna Johnson; Ed Peterson; Gwen Alexander; Mei Lu; Wanda Gibson-Scipio; Christine Cole Johnson Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Lokesh Guglani; Suzanne L Havstad; Christine Cole Johnson; Dennis R Ownby; Christine L M Joseph Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Dayna A Johnson; Lisa J Meltzer; Talan Zhang; Mei Lu; Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow; Stephanie Stokes-Buzzelli; Elizabeth Duffy; Brittany McKinnon; Prashant Mahajan; Susan Redline; Christine Lm Joseph Journal: Sleep Health Date: 2017-12-19
Authors: Jeff C Huffman; Julia Golden; Christina N Massey; Emily H Feig; Wei-Jean Chung; Rachel A Millstein; Lydia Brown; Taylor Gianangelo; Brian C Healy; Deborah J Wexler; Elyse R Park; Christopher M Celano Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 3.238