Literature DB >> 11308085

Using genetic markers to directly estimate male selection gradients.

M T Morgan1, J K Conner.   

Abstract

We present an analysis of Raphanus raphanistrum and simulations illustrating the utility of directly estimating male phenotypic selection gradients using genetic markers. The method offers a much more refined characterization of selection than attempting to assign paternity to individual progeny. Our analysis of R. raphanistrum reveals selection on remarkably fine features of floral morphology, including anther exsertion, that were opaque to previous approaches. The new results also undermine a previous conclusion that selection on wild radish floral morphology acts primarily through female fitness. Simulation results show that selection gradients on the order of beta = 0.1-0.2 can be readily detected with allozyme markers in moderate-sized (< 200 paternal individuals) populations. Highly polymorphic (e.g., microsatellite) markers will likely detect fine scale selection (beta < 0.1) in larger populations (> or = 400 individuals). Increased progeny sample size, by sampling either additional maternal families or more progeny per maternal parent, partly compensates for low exclusion probability. Increasing the number of possible fathers without changing progeny sample size decreases the ability to detect selection, especially at lower exclusion probabilities. Sampling only some male genotypes reduces the power to detect selection and biases (underestimates) the magnitude of the selection gradient estimate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11308085     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01292.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  18 in total

1.  Using empirical data to model transgene dispersal.

Authors:  T R Meagher; F C Belanger; P R Day
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond.

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?

Authors:  Tia-Lynn Ashman; Martin T Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Floral genetic architecture: an examination of QTL architecture underlying floral (co)variation across environments.

Authors:  Marcus T Brock; Jennifer M Dechaine; Federico L Iniguez-Luy; Julin N Maloof; John R Stinchcombe; Cynthia Weinig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Hormone-mediated suites as adaptations and evolutionary constraints.

Authors:  Joel W McGlothlin; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Using genetic markers to directly estimate gene flow and reproductive success parameters in plants on the basis of naturally regenerated seedlings.

Authors:  J Burczyk; W T Adams; D S Birkes; I J Chybicki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

Authors:  J Wang; A W Santure
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Darwin's legacy: the forms, function and sexual diversity of flowers.

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Patterns of phenotypic correlations among morphological traits across plants and animals.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Conner; Idelle A Cooper; Raffica J La Rosa; Samuel G Pérez; Anne M Royer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Adaptive differentiation of quantitative traits in the globally distributed weed, wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum).

Authors:  Heather F Sahli; Jeffrey K Conner; Frank H Shaw; Stephen Howe; Allison Lale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.