Literature DB >> 15156911

Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?

Tia-Lynn Ashman1, Martin T Morgan.   

Abstract

It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15156911      PMCID: PMC1691631          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model.

Authors:  J Burczyk; W T Adams; G F Moran; A R Griffin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Phenotypic selection in hawkmoth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces.

Authors:  J Maad
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sink-limitation and the size-number trade-off of organs: production of organs using a fixed amount of reserves.

Authors:  S Sakai; Y Harada
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Liver transplantation and bile analysis: a parallel evolution.

Authors:  H Vilca Melendez; M Rela; G Murphy; N Heaton
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Using genetic markers to directly estimate male selection gradients.

Authors:  M T Morgan; J K Conner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  C M Caruso
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae).

Authors:  Ronny Alexandersson; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Pollinator-mediated selection on a flower color polymorphism in experimental populations of Antirrhinum (Scrophulariaceae).

Authors:  K Niovi Jones; J S Reithel
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.844

10.  Patterns and mechanisms of selection on a family-diagnostic trait: evidence from experimental manipulation and lifetime fitness selection gradients.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Conner; Amber M Rice; Christy Stewart; Martin T Morgan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  32 in total

1.  Pollinator-mediated natural selection in Penstemon digitalis.

Authors:  Amy Parachnowitsch; André Kessler
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-12-01

2.  Pollination and late-acting self-incompatibility in Cyrtanthus breviflorus (Amaryllidaceae): implications for seed production.

Authors:  Glenda Vaughton; Mike Ramsey; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Reproductive success in varying light environments: direct and indirect effects of light on plants and pollinators.

Authors:  Francis F Kilkenny; Laura F Galloway
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  Randall J Mitchell; Rebecca E Irwin; Rebecca J Flanagan; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  New frontiers in competition for pollination.

Authors:  Randall J Mitchell; Rebecca J Flanagan; Beverly J Brown; Nickolas M Waser; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Matching floral and pollinator traits through guild convergence and pollinator ecotype formation.

Authors:  Ethan Newman; John Manning; Bruce Anderson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 7.  Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Marcelo A Aizen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Effects of floral display size on male and female reproductive success in Mimulus ringens.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karron; Randall J Mitchell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Evidence that a herbivore tolerance response affects selection on floral traits and inflorescence architecture in purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria).

Authors:  Christina J M Thomsen; Risa D Sargent
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 10.  Pollination intensity and paternity in flowering plants.

Authors:  Dorothy A Christopher; Randall J Mitchell; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.