Literature DB >> 11305086

Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause.

J M Pouillès1, F A Tremollières, S Martinez, M Delsol, C Ribot.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) measurement of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density (BMD) as defined according to the WHO classification. Two hundred and thirty-four healthy women aged 45-60 years were investigated. BMD was measured at the proximal and distal radius + ulna by pDXA and at the lumbar spine and femoral neck by DXA. There was a significant but moderate correlation between peripheral and axial BMD measurements, with r values ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 (SEE: 13.5-17%). The cutoff values for the proximal and distal radius BMD that allow the identification with 95% sensitivity of postmenopausal women with either a lumbar spine or femoral neck T-score < -1, corresponded to a T-score of +0.5 (proximal radius) and +1 (distal radius). More than 90% of the whole population had a peripheral T-score below these thresholds. Using an axial T-score < or = -2.5 as the definition of abnormality reduced to 48% (proximal radius) to 66% (distal radius) the number of women who would have required DXA axial measurements (i.e., with a pDXA T-score below the cutoff value of -0.7). Of the 33 women (14%) with a proximal radius T-score < or = -2.5 (osteoporosis), only 1 had a lumbar spine and femoral neck T-score > or = -1 (normal). Conversely, of the 50% (proximal radius) to 65% (distal radius) of the women with normal forearm measurement, 5% (proximal radius) to 9% (distal radius) were found to be osteoporotic and an additional 57% (proximal radius) to 59% (distal radius) could be classified as osteopenic (T-score between -1 and -2.5) at either the lumbar spine or femoral neck. In conclusion, use of pDXA forearm measurement as a prescreening tool in early postmenopausal women should allow the direct identification of about 50% of the women with no axial osteoporosis. However, this study highlights the difficulties in using a unique T-score that could be applied to different sites to diagnose osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11305086     DOI: 10.1007/s001980170160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  5 in total

1.  Bone health in healthy Indian population aged 50 years and above.

Authors:  R K Marwaha; N Tandon; M K Garg; R Kanwar; A Narang; A Sastry; A Saberwal; K Bhadra; A Mithal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review of accuracy.

Authors:  B Rud; J Hilden; L Hyldstrup; A Hróbjartsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?

Authors:  J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; K Perisinakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Utility and validation of bone mineral density measurements at forearm in predicting trabecular microarchitecture and central-site osteoporosis in aging Indian postmenopausal women-a promising surrogate?

Authors:  Krishna Prabha Gautam; Kripa Elizabeth Cherian; Nitin Kapoor; Nihal Thomas; Thomas Vizhalil Paul
Journal:  Aging Med (Milton)       Date:  2022-01-23

5.  Can radial bone mineral density predict spinal bone mineral density in patients with advanced Duchenne muscular dystrophy?

Authors:  Eunyoung Kim; Han Eol Cho; Ji Ho Jung; Jang Woo Lee; Won Ah Choi; Seong-Woong Kang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.