Literature DB >> 11304971

Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study.

P Härkki-Sirén1, J Sjöberg, J Toivonen, A Tiitinen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.
METHODS: Fifty women scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy were randomized to undergo either laparoscopic (n = 25) or abdominal (n = 25) hysterectomy. Surgical characteristics, hospital stay, convalescence and complications were analyzed. Blood samples for assay of markers of tissue trauma (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor and tumor-associated antigen CA 125) were taken preoperatively, on the first, second and seventh postoperative day and at the follow-up visit four weeks after surgery.
RESULTS: In uncomplicated hysterectomies (n = 18) the operating time (85.3 min versus 57.5 min, p < 0.00001) was longer for laparoscopic group but the hospital stay (2.1 days versus 3.4 days, p < 0.00001) and sick leave (21.4 days versus 38.5 days, p < 0.00001) were shorter in the laparoscopic group. Postoperative increases in all markers were significant in both groups. The interleukin-6 concentration was highest on the first postoperative day in both groups, that of C-reactive protein on the second postoperative day in both groups, tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor on the seventh postoperative day in the laparoscopic group and on the second postoperative day in the abdominal group and tumor-associated antigen CA 125 on the seventh postoperative day in both groups. Both interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels were lower in the laparoscopic group on the first (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively) and on the second postoperative day (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively) compared with the abdominal group. No differences were seen in tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor and tumor-associated antigen CA 125 levels between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy should replace abdominal hysterectomy whenever possible because of a more favorable clinical outcome and less tissue trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11304971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  13 in total

Review 1.  Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Buunen; M Gholghesaei; R Veldkamp; D W Meijer; H J Bonjer; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Stress response and well-being after open, laparoscopic, and NOTES transgastric uterine horn resection in a randomized porcine model.

Authors:  Maria Bergström; Asghar Azadani; Peter Falk; Per-Ola Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; David Barlow; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Liz Curr; Ray Garry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

4.  Tissue injuries after single-port and multiport laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries: A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Kyeong A So; Jae Kwan Lee; Jae Yun Song; Jae Won Kim; Nak Woo Lee; Kyung-Do Ki; Jong-Min Lee; Yong Jung Song; Yong Jin Na; Chun Hoe Ku; Jin Woo Shin; Chul Jung Kim; Un Suk Jung
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy and laparotomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Cai-Ying Hou; Xiu-Li Li; Feng Jiang; Rong Jie Gong; Xin Yu Guo; Yuan-Qing Yao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Comparison of the neuroendocrine and inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Tae Kwane Kim; Jun Rho Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10-21

7.  Economic and Survival Implications of Use of Electric Power Morcellation for Hysterectomy for Presumed Benign Gynecologic Disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Rosa R Cui; Anqi Wang; Ling Chen; Ana I Tergas; William M Burke; Cande V Ananth; June Y Hou; Alfred I Neugut; Sarah M Temkin; Y Claire Wang; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Indication for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Mitsuru Shiota; Yasushi Kotani; Masahiko Umemoto; Takako Tobiume; Hiroshi Hoshiai
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials.

Authors:  Claudia B M Bijen; Karin M Vermeulen; Marian J E Mourits; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.