Literature DB >> 11304016

Effect of visual surrounding motion on body sway in a three-dimensional environment.

M Guerraz1, C C Gianna, P M Burchill, M A Gresty, A M Bronstein.   

Abstract

Unidirectional motion of a uniplanar background induces a codirectional postural sway. It has been shown recently that fixation of a stationary foreground object induces a sway response in the opposite direction (Bronstein & Buckwell, 1997) when the background moves transiently. The present study investigated factors determining this contradirectional postural response. In the experiments presented, center of foot pressure and head displacements were recorded from normal subjects. The subjects faced a visual background of 2 x 3 m, at a distance of 1.5 m, which could be moved parallel to the interaural axis. Results showed that when the visual scene consisted solely of a moving background, the conventional codirectional postural response was elicited. When subjects were asked to fixate an earth-fixed foreground (window frame) placed between them and the moving background, a consistent postural response in the opposite direction to background motion was observed. In addition, we showed that this contradirectional postural response was not transient but was sustained for the 11 sec of background motion. We investigated whether this contradirectional postural response was the consequence of the induced movement of the foreground by background motion. Although induced movement was verbally reported by subjects when viewing an earth-fixed target projected onto the moving background, the contradirectional sway did not occur. These results indicate that foreground-background separation in depth was necessary for the contradirectional postural response to occur rather than induced movement. Another experiment showed that, when the fixated foreground was attached to the head of the observer, the contradirectional sway was not observed and was therefore unrelated to vergence. Finally, results showed that the contradirectional postural response was, in the main, monocularly mediated. We conclude that the direction of the postural sway produced by a moving background in a three-dimensional environment is determined primarily by motion parallax.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11304016     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  Differential integration of kinaesthetic signals to postural control.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of distance and gaze position on postural stability in young and old subjects.

Authors:  Zoï Kapoula; Thanh-Thuan Lê
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of expectation on postural disturbance evoked by proprioceptive stimulation.

Authors:  Sébastien Caudron; Fréderic Boy; Nicolas Forestier; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Postural challenge and adaptation to vibration-induced disturbances.

Authors:  Sébastien Caudron; Vincent Nougier; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Differential integration of visual and kinaesthetic signals to upright stance.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Benoît Fourre; Nicolas Vuillerme; Guillaume Giraudet; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motion parallax from microscopic head movements during visual fixation.

Authors:  Murat Aytekin; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Feedforward versus feedback modulation of human vestibular-evoked balance responses by visual self-motion information.

Authors:  Brian L Day; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The effects of local rotation on roll vection induced by globally rotating visual inducer.

Authors:  Shinji Nakamura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27

10.  Modulation of visually evoked postural responses by contextual visual, haptic and auditory information: a 'virtual reality check'.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Fei Shao; Mark D White; Carl Hopkins; Antony J Robotham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.