Literature DB >> 11302333

A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip.

M A Ritter1, L D Harty, M E Keating, P M Faris, J B Meding.   

Abstract

Patients who had anterolateral and posterolateral approaches in total hip replacement surgery were compared clinically for limp, dislocation, hospital stay, and discharge disposition. The only statistical difference was that the posterior approach had a statistically higher dislocation rate. Although the number of patients with limp was higher in the anterolateral group, the difference was not statistically different.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11302333     DOI： 10.1097/00003086-200104000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches?

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; S M Javad Mortazavi; Justin Brothers; Javad Parvizi; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The capsule's contribution to total hip construct stability--a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Nicholas J Stroud; M James Rudert; Yuki Tochigi; Douglas R Pedersen; Benjamin J Ellis; John J Callaghan; Jeffrey A Weiss; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Factors influencing early rehabilitation after THA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivek Sharma; Patrick M Morgan; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Acetabular orientation: anterolateral approach in the supine position.

Authors:  Matthew S Austin; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the traditional anterolateral approach (Watson-Jones) for hip hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture: an analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Louis de Jong; Taco M A L Klem; Tjallingius M Kuijper; Gert R Roukema
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The incidence of hip dislocation and suture failure according to two different types of posterior soft tissue repair techniques in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jun-Ki Moon; Yeesuk Kim; Kyu-Tae Hwang; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Inge H F Reininga; Wiebren Zijlstra; Robert Wagenmakers; Alexander L Boerboom; Bregtje P Huijbers; Johan W Groothoff; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Total hip arthroplasty using a combined anterior and posterior approach via a lateral incision in patients with ankylosed hips.

Authors:  Jian Li; Zhiwei Wang; Ming Li; Yuesong Wu; Weidong Xu; Zimin Wang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Which approach for total hip arthroplasty: anterolateral or posterior?

Authors:  Jeya Palan; David J Beard; David W Murray; J G Andrew; John Nolan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Blood loss in the minimally invasive posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jose Ricardo Negreiros Vicente; Alberto Tesconi Croci; Olavo Pires de Camargo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.365
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.