Literature DB >> 11302109

Results of the low-dose (20 mg) pravastatin GISSI Prevenzione trial in 4271 patients with recent myocardial infarction: do stopped trials contribute to overall knowledge? GISSI Prevenzione Investigators (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico).

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a low-dose pravastatin regimen (20 mg daily) in patients with myocardial infarction.
METHODS: GISSI Prevenzione (GISSI-P) is an open trial on secondary coronary heart disease prevention: 4271 recent acute myocardial infarction patients (< or = 6 months) with total blood cholesterol > or = 200 mg/dl were randomized to low-dose cholesterol-lowering treatment (pravastatin 20 mg daily) or no treatment. GISSI-P was started in 1993 and its story was crossed by the publication of the results of similarly designed clinical trials. The publication of 4S results in 1994 prompted the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) and the Steering Committee (SC) to change the protocol so that only patients whose total blood cholesterol was < 250 mg/dl could be randomized whilst patients with total blood cholesterol > 250 mg/dl who had already been enrolled in the study had to be re-evaluated and, if appropriate, pharmacologically treated. The DSMB and the SC agreed to stop randomization prematurely in late 1996 after the publication of CARE results.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 23.0 +/- 6.7 months (median 24.3 months). The two treatment groups were well matched at baseline. Pharmacological interventions recommended by the protocol were widely prescribed (antiplatelet agents > 90%, beta-blockers 42.7%, and ACE-inhibitors 40.2%). Mainly because of the on-course modification of the study protocol, 402/2133 (18.8%) patients in the control group started a cholesterol-lowering treatment during follow-up. Conversely, 296/2138 (13.8%) patients permanently stopped taking their tablets. Side effects, however, were the reason for discontinuing therapy in 57 (2.7%) patients in the pravastatin group, and patient reluctance to continue accounted for most of the remainder. After excluding control patients who had started a cholesterol-lowering treatment during follow-up, the following changes of median lipid concentrations in the control group over the whole course were observed: total cholesterol -1.9%; LDL cholesterol -2.9%; triglycerides -2.0%; HDL cholesterol +1.4%. The analysis carried out excluding patients randomized to pravastatin treatment and actually not assuming the drug clearly indicated the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of low-dose pravastatin (total cholesterol -12.5%; LDL cholesterol -18.8%; triglycerides -7.9%; HDL cholesterol +3.4%). During the study 256 (6.0%) patients either died or had a non-fatal stroke or a myocardial infarction, 136 (6.4%) in the control group and 120 (5.6%) in the pravastatin group (relative risk 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.71-1.15, p = 0.41); 160 patients died, 88 (4.1%) in the control group and 72 (3.4%) in the pravastatin group (relative risk 0.84, 94% confidence interval 0.61-1.14, p = 0.26). The few (n = 28) non-cardiovascular deaths were balanced: 16 (0.8%) in the control group and 15 (0.6%) in the pravastatin group. The reduction of cardiovascular events was more evident in the by-treatment analysis, with coronary heart disease deaths being significantly decreased (relative risk 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.96, p = 0.04). The overall frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups. No significant difference between treatment groups was found for total cases of cancer or at any particular site.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the decreased statistical power due to its premature stopping, the results of the GISSI-P suggest that a low-dose treatment with pravastatin (20 mg daily) is effective in reducing blood lipids, and underline the importance of long-term compliance with treatments in the search for a maximal effective dosage. Furthermore, the effects of a statin on total and coronary mortality quantified for the first time in a population exposed to Mediterranean dietary and lifestyle habits are markedly consistent with those obtained in different settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11302109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital Heart J        ISSN: 1129-471X


  38 in total

Review 1.  Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.

Authors:  Goodarz Danaei; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Role of Ezetimibe in Lipid-Lowering and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Bryan A Smith; Charmaine Wright; Michael Davidson
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Are statins diabetogenic?

Authors:  Uchechukwu K Sampson; Macrae F Linton; Sergio Fazio
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Can statin therapy reduce the risk of melanoma? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Stefanos Bonovas; Georgios Nikolopoulos; Kalitsa Filioussi; Evangelia Peponi; Pantelis Bagos; Nikolaos M Sitaras
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Statins Provide Less Benefit in Populations with High Noncardiovascular Mortality Risk: Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Caroline A Kim; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Prospective analysis of association between use of statins and melanoma risk in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Deepa Jagtap; Carol A Rosenberg; Lisa W Martin; Mary Pettinger; Janardan Khandekar; Dorothy Lane; Ira Ockene; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Statin use in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: cohort study and comparison of inclusion and outcome with patients in randomised trials.

Authors:  Li Wei; Shah Ebrahim; Christopher Bartlett; Peter D Davey; Frank M Sullivan; Thomas M MacDonald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-24

Review 8.  Low density lipoprotein cholesterol, statins and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Genser; Winfried März
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 9.  Reassessing the benefits of statins in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Hung Chang; Ming-Chia Hsieh; Cheng-Yuan Wang; Kun-Cheng Lin; Yau-Jiunn Lee
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2013-08-10

10.  Significant reduction in the LDL cholesterol increases the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Longwei Qiao; Zhibiao Jiang; Xiaofeng Dong; Hongxuan Feng; Qian Gui; Yaojuan Lu; Yuting Liang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.