PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Statins are widely utilized for low-density lipoprotein lowering and for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Although these drugs have a good safety record, increased risk of developing diabetes during extended use has recently garnered attention. Here we review clinical trial evidence related to statin use and incident diabetes, and the potential mechanisms for this association. RECENT FINDINGS: The increased incidence of diabetes with rosuvastatin treatment in Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: an intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) reignited attention on the link between statin therapy and diabetes. The JUPITER findings are supported by two recent meta-analyses of large-scale placebo-controlled and standard care-controlled trials, which, respectively, observed a 9% [odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.17] and 13% (risk ratio 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.23) increased risk for incident diabetes associated with statin therapy. However, the underlying mechanisms for this association remain unclear. Experimental evidence supports a paradigm implicating inhibition of β-cell glucose transporters, delayed ATP production, pro-inflammatory and oxidative β-cell effects of plasma-derived cholesterol, inhibition of calcium channel-dependent insulin secretion, and β-cell apoptosis. SUMMARY: The aggregate of large clinical trials supports the notion that statins modestly increase the risk of incident diabetes. Because diabetes is a risk equivalent condition for coronary and peripheral arterial diseases, these findings create a paradox whereby needed statin therapy may be withheld to avoid excess risk of diabetes while representing the strongest cardiovascular risk reduction tool in diabetics. We simply recommend regular glucose monitoring in patients taking statins.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Statins are widely utilized for low-density lipoprotein lowering and for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Although these drugs have a good safety record, increased risk of developing diabetes during extended use has recently garnered attention. Here we review clinical trial evidence related to statin use and incident diabetes, and the potential mechanisms for this association. RECENT FINDINGS: The increased incidence of diabetes with rosuvastatin treatment in Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: an intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) reignited attention on the link between statin therapy and diabetes. The JUPITER findings are supported by two recent meta-analyses of large-scale placebo-controlled and standard care-controlled trials, which, respectively, observed a 9% [odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.17] and 13% (risk ratio 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.23) increased risk for incident diabetes associated with statin therapy. However, the underlying mechanisms for this association remain unclear. Experimental evidence supports a paradigm implicating inhibition of β-cell glucose transporters, delayed ATP production, pro-inflammatory and oxidative β-cell effects of plasma-derived cholesterol, inhibition of calcium channel-dependent insulin secretion, and β-cell apoptosis. SUMMARY: The aggregate of large clinical trials supports the notion that statins modestly increase the risk of incident diabetes. Because diabetes is a risk equivalent condition for coronary and peripheral arterial diseases, these findings create a paradox whereby needed statin therapy may be withheld to avoid excess risk of diabetes while representing the strongest cardiovascular risk reduction tool in diabetics. We simply recommend regular glucose monitoring in patients taking statins.
Authors: Sidney C Smith; Jerilyn Allen; Steven N Blair; Robert O Bonow; Lawrence M Brass; Gregg C Fonarow; Scott M Grundy; Loren Hiratzka; Daniel Jones; Harlan M Krumholz; Lori Mosca; Thomas Pearson; Marc A Pfeffer; Kathryn A Taubert Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-05-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: A Abderrahmani; G Niederhauser; D Favre; S Abdelli; M Ferdaoussi; J Y Yang; R Regazzi; C Widmann; G Waeber Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: John Kjekshus; Eduard Apetrei; Vivencio Barrios; Michael Böhm; John G F Cleland; Jan H Cornel; Peter Dunselman; Cândida Fonseca; Assen Goudev; Peer Grande; Lars Gullestad; Ake Hjalmarson; Jaromir Hradec; András Jánosi; Gabriel Kamenský; Michel Komajda; Jerzy Korewicki; Timo Kuusi; François Mach; Vyacheslav Mareev; John J V McMurray; Naresh Ranjith; Maria Schaufelberger; Johan Vanhaecke; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Finn Waagstein; Hans Wedel; John Wikstrand Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian Graham; Dan Atar; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Gudrun Boysen; Gunilla Burell; Renata Cifkova; Jean Dallongeville; Guy De Backer; Shah Ebrahim; Bjørn Gjelsvik; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen; Arno Hoes; Steve Humphries; Mike Knapton; Joep Perk; Silvia G Priori; Kalevi Pyorala; Zeljko Reiner; Luis Ruilope; Susana Sans-Menendez; Wilma Scholte op Reimer; Peter Weissberg; David Wood; John Yarnell; Jose Luis Zamorano; Edmond Walma; Tony Fitzgerald; Marie Therese Cooney; Alexandra Dudina Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-08-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Claus M Larsen; Mirjam Faulenbach; Allan Vaag; Aage Vølund; Jan A Ehses; Burkhardt Seifert; Thomas Mandrup-Poulsen; Marc Y Donath Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-04-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sagar B Dugani; Akintunde O Akinkuolie; Nina Paynter; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Samia Mora Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 14.676