Literature DB >> 21362522

Quantitative ultrasound in cancer imaging.

Ernest J Feleppa1, Jonathan Mamou, Christopher R Porter, Junji Machi.   

Abstract

Ultrasound is a relatively inexpensive, portable, and versatile imaging modality that has a broad range of clinical uses. It incorporates many imaging modes, such as conventional gray-scale "B-mode" imaging to display echo amplitude in a scanned plane; M-mode imaging to track motion at a given fixed location over time; duplex, color, and power Doppler imaging to display motion in a scanned plane; harmonic imaging to display nonlinear responses to incident ultrasound; elastographic imaging to display relative tissue stiffness; and contrast-agent imaging with simple contrast agents to display blood-filled spaces or with targeted agents to display specific agent-binding tissue types. These imaging modes have been well described in the scientific, engineering, and clinical literature. A less well-known ultrasonic imaging technology is based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS), which analyzes the distribution of power as a function of frequency in the original received echo signals from tissue and exploits the resulting spectral parameters to characterize and distinguish among tissues. This article discusses the attributes of QUS-based methods for imaging cancers and providing improved means of detecting and assessing tumors. The discussion will include applications to imaging primary prostate cancer and metastatic cancer in lymph nodes to illustrate the methods.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21362522      PMCID: PMC3057450          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  27 in total

1.  Propagation speed of sound assessment in the layers of the guinea-pig esophagus in vitro by means of acoustic microscopy.

Authors:  J E Assentoft; H Gregersen; W D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 2.  Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Relationship of ultrasonic spectral parameters to features of tissue microstructure.

Authors:  F L Lizzi; M Ostromogilsky; E J Feleppa; M C Rorke; M M Yaremko
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 4.  Imaging prostate cancer: current and future applications.

Authors:  E A el-Gabry; E J Halpern; S E Strup; L G Gomella
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  M-mode ultrasound: a reliable measure of transversus abdominis thickness?

Authors:  S M Bunce; A P Moore; A D Hough
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 6.  Ultrasound contrast agents: a review.

Authors:  B B Goldberg; J B Liu; F Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Three-dimensional high-frequency characterization of cancerous lymph nodes.

Authors:  Jonathan Mamou; Alain Coron; Masaki Hata; Junji Machi; Eugene Yanagihara; Pascal Laugier; Ernest J Feleppa
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Ultrasonic multifeature tissue characterization for prostate diagnostics.

Authors:  Ulrich Scheipers; Helmut Ermert; Hans-Joerg Sommerfeld; Miguel Garcia-Schürmann; Theodor Senge; Stathis Philippou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.

Authors:  Hui Zhi; Bing Ou; Bao-Ming Luo; Xia Feng; Yan-Ling Wen; Hai-Yun Yang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Identifying acoustic scattering sources in normal renal parenchyma in vivo by varying arterial and ureteral pressures.

Authors:  M F Insana; J G Wood; T J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Imaging Considerations and Interprofessional Opportunities in the Care of Breast Cancer Patients in the Neoadjuvant Setting.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Sara Harvey; Anum Syed; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.315

2.  Quantitative ultrasound and apoptotic death in the neonatal primate brain.

Authors:  Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Kevin K Noguchi; Laura Castañeda-Martinez; George Kirvassilis; Sophie H Wang; Francesca Manzella; Brant S Swiney; Kobe Masuoka; Saverio Capuano; Kevin G Brunner; Kristin Crosno; Quinton W Guerrero; Hayley Whitson; Ansgar Brambrink; Heather S Simmons; Andres F Mejia; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall; Chrysanthy Ikonomidou
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  Characterization of the pancreas in vivo using EUS spectrum analysis with electronic array echoendoscopes.

Authors:  Ronald E Kumon; Aparna Repaka; Matthew Atkinson; Ashley L Faulx; Richard C K Wong; Gerard A Isenberg; Yi-Sing Hsiao; Madhu S R Gudur; Cheri X Deng; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Real-time implementation of a dual-mode ultrasound array system: in vivo results.

Authors:  Andrew J Casper; Dalong Liu; John R Ballard; Emad S Ebbini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Conventional frequency ultrasonic biomarkers of cancer treatment response in vivo.

Authors:  Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Omar Falou; Hadi Tadayyon; Azza Al-Mahrouki; William Tran; Naum Papanicolau; Michael C Kolios; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopic imaging for characterization of disease extent in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Ervis Sofroni; Naum Papanicolau; Omar Falou; Linda Sugar; Gerard Morton; Martin J Yaffe; Robert Nam; Alireza Sadeghian; Michael C Kolios; Hans T Chung; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  A Fusion-Based Approach for Breast Ultrasound Image Classification Using Multiple-ROI Texture and Morphological Analyses.

Authors:  Mohammad I Daoud; Tariq M Bdair; Mahasen Al-Najar; Rami Alazrai
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Quantitative ultrasound characterization of tumor cell death: ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for radiation enhancement.

Authors:  Hyunjung Christina Kim; Azza Al-Mahrouki; Alborz Gorjizadeh; Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Raffi Karshafian; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quantitative ultrasound imaging of therapy response in bladder cancer in vivo.

Authors:  William T Tran; Lakshmanan Sannachi; Naum Papanicolau; Hadi Tadayyon; Azza Al Mahrouki; Ahmed El Kaffas; Alborz Gorjizadeh; Justin Lee; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2016-04-18

10.  Multiparametric monitoring of chemotherapy treatment response in locally advanced breast cancer using quantitative ultrasound and diffuse optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  William T Tran; Charmaine Childs; Lee Chin; Elzbieta Slodkowska; Lakshmanan Sannachi; Hadi Tadayyon; Elyse Watkins; Sharon Lemon Wong; Belinda Curpen; Ahmed El Kaffas; Azza Al-Mahrouki; Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.