Literature DB >> 11296470

Using disease-related and demographic variables to form cancer-distress risk groups.

R A Schnoll1, L L Harlow.   

Abstract

The use of disease-related (i.e., stage, phase, perceived health) and demographic (i.e., age, education, income) variables to identify subgroups of cancer patients and survivors manifesting divergent risk for psychosocial adjustment problems was assessed. Clustering procedures distinguished three clusters across two subsamples. In each subsample, low-risk participants had a low stage, a later phase, high perceived health, an older age, and a high education and income; moderate-risk participants had a low stage, a later phase, high perceived health, a greater age, and a low education and income; and high-risk individuals had high stage, an earlier phase, low perceived health, an average age, and a low education and income. Mean difference analyses showed that low-risk participants had higher psychosocial adjustment than high- and moderate-risk participants. High-risk participants had lower psychosocial adjustment than moderate-risk participants. The risk for psychosocial adjustment problems may be influenced by disease-related and demographic variables, and implications for the targeting of interventions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11296470     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005686404723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  36 in total

Review 1.  Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.

Authors:  S E Hobfoll
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1989-03

2.  The process of recovery from breast cancer for younger and older patients. Changes during the first year.

Authors:  A D Vinokur; B A Threatt; D Vinokur-Kaplan; W A Satariano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Causal attributions, coping strategies, and adjustment to breast cancer.

Authors:  J F Lavery; V A Clarke
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Role of health locus of control beliefs and expectations of treatment efficacy in adjustment to cancer.

Authors:  G Marks; J L Richardson; J W Graham; A Levine
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-08

Review 6.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.

Authors:  W Mischel; Y Shoda
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Cancer statistics, 1998.

Authors:  S H Landis; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Controlled prospective longitudinal study of women with cancer: I. Sexual functioning outcomes.

Authors:  B L Andersen; B Anderson; C deProsse
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1989-12

9.  Medical and economic costs of psychologic distress in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T G Allison; D E Williams; T D Miller; C A Patten; K R Bailey; R W Squires; G T Gau
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Identifying priorities of psychosocial need in cancer patients.

Authors:  L P Liang; S M Dunn; A Gorman; R Stuart-Harris
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  The effects of age and emotional acceptance on distress among breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mary C Politi; Timothy M Enright; Karen L Weihs
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  From Wary Wearers to d-Embracers: Personas of Readiness to Use Diabetes Devices.

Authors:  Molly L Tanenbaum; Rebecca N Adams; Esti Iturralde; Sarah J Hanes; Regan C Barley; Diana Naranjo; Korey K Hood
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-22

3.  Quality of life of testicular cancer survivors and the relationship with sociodemographics, cancer-related variables, and life events.

Authors:  J Fleer; H J Hoekstra; D T Sleijfer; M A Tuinman; E C Klip; J E H M Hoekstra-Weebers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  The role of socioeconomic status in adjustment after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Janet S de Moor; Ann H Partridge; Eric P Winer; Jennifer Ligibel; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Why is Cancer More Depressing for Men than Women among Older White Adults?

Authors:  Tetyana Pudrovska
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2010-12

6.  Receipt of psychosocial care among cancer survivors in the United States.

Authors:  Laura P Forsythe; Erin E Kent; Kathryn E Weaver; Natasha Buchanan; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan L Rodriguez; A Blythe Ryerson; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Antidepressant prescribing in community cancer care.

Authors:  Fredrick D Ashbury; Lisa Madlensky; Peter Raich; Mark Thompson; Geoff Whitney; Ken Hotz; Boris Kralj; William S Edell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 3.603

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.