BACKGROUND: A large body of literature suggests that socioeconomic status (SES) is positively associated with mental and physical health. However, little research has examined the impact of SES on psychological adjustment after a major stressor. The current study examined whether SES (education and financial status) was associated with distress (anxiety and depression) in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This study also explored whether social support explained the association between SES and distress and whether social support buffered the impact of low SES on distress. METHODS: A total of 487 women with newly diagnosed DCIS were enrolled in the study. Participants completed questions about sociodemographic, psychosocial, and clinical characteristics at the time of enrollment and 9 months after their diagnosis. RESULTS: Financial status was inversely associated with anxiety and depression at the 9-month follow-up. Financial status also predicted change in anxiety and depression. Women with high financial status reported a decline in anxiety and depression during the study period, whereas women with medium or low financial status reported an increase in anxiety and depression. In addition, the probability of exceeding the screening threshold suggestive of clinical depression increased with decreasing financial status. Education was not associated with anxiety or depression. The presence of social support did not explain the association between financial status and change in distress. Social support did not buffer the effect of low SES on anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Women with medium or low SES were vulnerable to escalating anxiety and depression after a DCIS diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: A large body of literature suggests that socioeconomic status (SES) is positively associated with mental and physical health. However, little research has examined the impact of SES on psychological adjustment after a major stressor. The current study examined whether SES (education and financial status) was associated with distress (anxiety and depression) in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This study also explored whether social support explained the association between SES and distress and whether social support buffered the impact of low SES on distress. METHODS: A total of 487 women with newly diagnosed DCIS were enrolled in the study. Participants completed questions about sociodemographic, psychosocial, and clinical characteristics at the time of enrollment and 9 months after their diagnosis. RESULTS: Financial status was inversely associated with anxiety and depression at the 9-month follow-up. Financial status also predicted change in anxiety and depression. Women with high financial status reported a decline in anxiety and depression during the study period, whereas women with medium or low financial status reported an increase in anxiety and depression. In addition, the probability of exceeding the screening threshold suggestive of clinical depression increased with decreasing financial status. Education was not associated with anxiety or depression. The presence of social support did not explain the association between financial status and change in distress. Social support did not buffer the effect of low SES on anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS:Women with medium or low SES were vulnerable to escalating anxiety and depression after a DCIS diagnosis.
Authors: Y R B M van Gestel; A C Voogd; A J J M Vingerhoets; F Mols; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; O J Repelaer van Driel; C L H van Berlo; L V van de Poll-Franse Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ann Partridge; Kristie Adloff; Emily Blood; E Claire Dees; Carolyn Kaelin; Mehra Golshan; Jennifer Ligibel; Janet S de Moor; Jane Weeks; Karen Emmons; Eric Winer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Elizabeth A Calhoun; Elizabeth M Whitley; Angelina Esparza; Elizabeth Ness; Amanda Greene; Roland Garcia; Patricia A Valverde Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2008-12-30
Authors: Amy M Berkman; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Kim Dittus; Vicki Hart; Christine M Vatovec; John G King; Ted A James; Susan G Lakoski; Brian L Sprague Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: K Robin Yabroff; Emily C Dowling; Gery P Guy; Matthew P Banegas; Amy Davidoff; Xuesong Han; Katherine S Virgo; Timothy S McNeel; Neetu Chawla; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Erin E Kent; Chunyu Li; Juan L Rodriguez; Janet S de Moor; Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal; Donatus U Ekwueme Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kathryn J Ruddy; Meghan E Meyer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Karen M Emmons; Jane C Weeks; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-04-08
Authors: Sherrie Khadanga; Susan G Lakoski; Vicki Hart; Brian L Sprague; Yi Ba; John M Hampton; Stephen T Higgins; Philip A Ades; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 4.254