Literature DB >> 11294235

How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness.

S B Most1, D J Simons, B J Scholl, R Jimenez, E Clifford, C F Chabris.   

Abstract

When people attend to objects or events in a visual display, they often fail to notice an additional, unexpected, but fully visible object or event in the same display. This phenomenon is now known as inattentional blindness. We present a new approach to the study of sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events in order to explore the roles of similarity, distinctiveness, and attentional set in the detection of unexpected objects. In Experiment 1, we found that the similarity of an unexpected object to other objects in the display influences attentional capture: The more similar an unexpected object is to the attended items, and the greater its differencefrom the ignored items, the more likely it is that people will notice it. Experiment 2 explored whether this effect of similarity is driven by selective ignoring of irrelevant items or by selective focusing on attended items. The results of Experiment 3 suggest that the distinctiveness of the unexpected object alone cannot entirely account for the similarity effects found in the first two experiments; when attending to black items or white items in a dynamic display, nearly 30% of observers failed to notice a bright red cross move across the display, even though it had a unique color, luminance, shape, and motion trajectory and was visible for 5s. Together, the results suggest that inattentional blindness for ongoing dynamic events depends both on the similarity of the unexpected object to the other objects in the display and on the observer's attentional set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294235     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  55 in total

1.  The influence of sustained selective attention on stimulus selectivity in macaque visual area MT.

Authors:  Detlef Wegener; Winrich A Freiwald; Andreas K Kreiter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The time course of intended and unintended allocation of attention.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-08-31

3.  Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Candace E Peacock; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Attentional disregulation: a benefit for implicit memory.

Authors:  Gillian Rowe; Steven Valderrama; Lynn Hasher; Agatha Lenartowicz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-12

5.  Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

6.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Out of Mind, Out of Sight: Unexpected Scene Elements Frequently Go Unnoticed Until Primed.

Authors:  George M Slavich; Philip G Zimbardo
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2013-12-01

8.  Inattentional deafness in music.

Authors:  Sabrina Koreimann; Bartosz Gula; Oliver Vitouch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-21

9.  Predicting and manipulating the incidence of inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Anne Richards; Emily M Hannon; Nazanin Derakshan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-01-09

10.  The effects of individual differences and task difficulty on inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Melinda S Jensen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.