Literature DB >> 11289168

Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures.

E Ellis1, G S Throckmorton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared maximum voluntary bite forces in patients who received either open or closed treatment for fractures of the mandibular condylar process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-five patients (127 male, 28 female) with unilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process (91 treated closed and 64 treated open) were included in this study. Maximum voluntary bite forces were measured at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years after fracture. At each trial, unilateral maximum voluntary bite force was measured at 4 different tooth positions bilaterally using a standard transducer. Electromyography (EMG) of the masseter muscles was also recorded during the bite force measurements, and ratios of the working/balancing side EMG were calculated. Analysis of the data was performed using standard statistical methods.
RESULTS: The only significant difference between the 2 samples was in the level of fractures on the condylar process. No patients treated open had fractures of the "head" of the condylar process, whereas there were 11 in the group treated closed. No differences were observed in maximum voluntary bite forces between the 2 treatment groups at any time period, or were there correlations between bite force magnitude and location of the fracture, displacement of the fracture, or any other variable studied. Both groups showed a significant recovery of maximum bite force from the 6-week to the 6-month testing session. For both groups, working/balancing EMG ratios were significantly greater when subjects were biting on the side opposite the fracture. When biting on that side, the working/balancing EMG ratios were higher in the closed treatment group, but the difference did not reach significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Maximum voluntary bite forces in patients treated for mandibular condylar process fractures do not differ significantly when treatment is open or closed. Neuromuscular adaptations to the fractured mandibular condylar process occur in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11289168     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2001.21873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of approaches for the rigid fixation of sub-condylar fractures.

Authors:  Vijay Ebenezer; Balakrishnan Ramalingam
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-03-29

2.  Evaluation of in vitro resistance of different 2.0-mm titanium plates on the mandibular angle sectioning.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio Kenichi Yamaji; Patrício José de Oliveira Neto; Michel de Campos Ribeiro; Lucas Cavalieri Pereira; Márcio de Morais; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-03

3.  Applications of the endoscope in facial fracture management.

Authors:  Chen Lee; Marcin Czerwinski
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Pearls of mandibular trauma management.

Authors:  John C Koshy; Evan M Feldman; Chuma J Chike-Obi; Jamal M Bullocks
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Assessment of masticatory function using bite force measurements in patients treated for mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Deborah Sybil; K Gopalkrishnan
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-09-26

6.  Evaluation of Retro Mandibular Approach to Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Condylar Fractures: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  J K Dayashankara Rao; Neelima Gehlot; Vijay Siwach
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-06

7.  Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture.

Authors:  Sanjay Rastogi; Mahendra Parvath Reddy; Azeez Gaurav Swarup; Divya Swarup; Rupshikha Choudhury
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-09-21

8.  Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture.

Authors:  Kolli Yada Giri; Puneet Sahu; Sanjay Rastogi; Ramakant Dandriyal; Sunil Mall; Aishwarya Pratap Singh; Niranjana Prasad Indra B; Himanshu Pratap Singh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-03-10

9.  Long-term masticatory performance and ability following closed treatment for unilateral mandibular condylar neck or base fractures: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Florine M Weinberg; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; Barbara S Muller; Caroline M Speksnijder
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-01-23

Review 10.  Evaluation of bite force after open reduction and internal fixation using microplates.

Authors:  S Tharani Kumar; Saurabh Saraf; S Prasanna Devi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.