Literature DB >> 11285960

A critical analysis of intraoperative time utilization in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

E Berber1, K L Engle, A Garland, A String, A Foroutani, J M Pearl, A E Siperstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most of the expense of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is incurred while the patient is in the operation room; however, heretofore there has been no critical analysis of the time required to perform the various steps of the operation. An understanding of how operative time is used is the first step toward improving the efficiency of the procedure and decreasing costs while maintaining an acceptable standard of care.
METHODS: Of 194 patients undergoing LC at a university hospital between 1994 and 1997, operational videotapes of 48 randomly chosen patients were reviewed. Three groups of patients were identified: those undergoing LC for chronic cholecystitis (n = 27), those undergoing LC for acute cholecystitis (n = 11), and those with common bile duct stones (CBDS), (n = 10) undergoing LC with transcystic common bile duct exploration. The procedure was divided into the following seven steps; trocar entry, laparoscopic ultrasound, dissection of the triangle of Calot, cholangiogram, dissection of the gallbladder, extraction of the gallbladder, and irrigation-aspiration with removal of ports. Time spent for camera cleaning, bleeding control, and insertion of the cholangiocatheter into the cystic duct was also calculated. The groups were compared in terms of time spent for each step using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD operating time was 66.5 +/- 20.5 min. The acute group had the longest operating time, followed by the CBDS and chronic groups. Dissection of the gallbladder, insertion of the cholangiocatheter, and irrigation-aspiration were longer steps in the acute group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). Dissection of the triangle of Calot took longer in acute cholecystitis than in chronic cholecystitis (p < 0.05). CBDS cases took longer (p < 0.05) than chronic cases because stone extraction added an average of 17.5 min to the time required for the cholangiogram in chronic cholecystitis. Laparoscopic ultrasound took longer in the CBDS group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). The mean +/- SD time spent for the cholangiogram and laparoscopic ultrasound in chronic cholecystitis was 7.5 +/- 4.3 and 4.8 +/- 1.9 min, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This time analysis study demonstrates that acute cholecystitis requires a longer operating time because most of the individual steps in the procedure take longer. In patients with choledocholithiasis, stone extraction was responsible for longer operating times. This study should serve as a basis for future studies focusing on time utilization in laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11285960     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  [Complication rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy not different for residents in training and surgeons].

Authors:  R M Crolla; B van Ramshorst; A Jansen
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1997-04-05

2.  There's a hole in my bucket: the cost of disposable instruments.

Authors:  W W Hurd; M P Diamond
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Development of a fogless scope and its analysis using infrared radiation pyrometer.

Authors:  D Hashimoto; M Shouji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the procedure of choice for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  S M Wiesen; S W Unger; J S Barkin; D S Edelman; J S Scott; H M Unger
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  C M Lo; C L Liu; E C Lai; S T Fan; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Pharmacologic hemostasis in laparoscopy: topical epinephrine facilitates cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G G Kuster; B Fischer
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its treatment. The role of ultrasound and intravenous and intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  M Garcia-Caballero; A Martin-Palanca; C Vara-Thorbeck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Technique of ultrasound examination during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Machi; B Sigel; H A Zaren; J Schwartz; T Hosokawa; H Kitamura; R V Kolecki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; M J Hyser; J B Hanks; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The ultrasonic dissector facilitates laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L A Wetter; J H Payne; G Kirshenbaum; E F Podoll; T Bachinsky; L W Way
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Routine intraoperative aspiration of gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Calik; S Topaloglu; S Topcu; S Turkyilmaz; U Kucuktulu; B Piskin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A systematic review of intraoperative process mapping in surgery.

Authors:  Ru Dee Chung; David J Hunter-Smith; Robert T Spychal; Venkat V Ramakrishnan; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

3.  Variation in Estimated Surgical Procedure Times Across Patient Characteristics and Surgeon Specialty.

Authors:  Daniel J Crespin; Teague Ruder; Andrew W Mulcahy; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 16.681

4.  Laparoscopic ultrasound as the primary method for bile duct imaging during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K A Perry; J A Myers; D J Deziel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients.

Authors:  Homero Rivas; Esteban Varela; Daniel Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A Step-Wise Approach to Total Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Jejunal Pouch Reconstruction: How and Why We Do It.

Authors:  Hylke J F Brenkman; Juan Correa-Cote; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.