Literature DB >> 1417485

The ultrasonic dissector facilitates laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

L A Wetter1, J H Payne, G Kirshenbaum, E F Podoll, T Bachinsky, L W Way.   

Abstract

The ultrasonic dissector disrupts tissues in proportion to their fluid content by ultrasonically induced cavitational forces. Since sturdy tissues are spared, the instrument tends to follow tissue planes and to dissect fat and other soft tissues selectively. We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 73 patients comparing the safety and efficacy of a prototype ultrasonic dissector with that of electrosurgery and laser during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Randomization was as follows: ultrasonic dissector, 37 patients; electrosurgery, 21 patients; and laser, 15 patients. The results were not different with respect to patient characteristics, amount of blood loss, technical difficulties, length of hospital stay, or return to work. Subjectively, the ultrasonic dissector was thought to be of special value in isolating the hilar structures, particularly when they were edematous or embedded in fat. The ultrasonic dissector disintegrated the fat, which was rapidly cleared up the suction channel, allowing the cystic duct and artery to be bared with less risk of injury. We concluded that the ultrasonic dissector has unique attributes that contribute to the ease and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1417485     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420100053009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  9 in total

1.  Improved outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection: a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Yucel Cengiz; Jan Dalenbäck; Gunnar Edlund; Leif A Israelsson; Arthur Jänes; Mats Möller; Anders Thorell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative study between clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic scalpel versus conventional method: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Tharwat Kandil; Ayman El Nakeeb; Emad El Hefnawy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Ultrasonic dissection.

Authors:  J H Payne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A critical analysis of intraoperative time utilization in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E Berber; K L Engle; A Garland; A String; A Foroutani; J M Pearl; A E Siperstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Dissection by ultrasonic energy versus monopolar electrosurgical energy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Walid Sasi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Varun Mahabaleshwar; Lileswar Kaman; Javid Iqbal; Rajinder Singh
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Laparoscopic "Dome-down" cholecystectomy with the LCS-5 Harmonic scalpel.

Authors:  Terrence M Fullum; Sung Kim; Dilip Dan; Patricia L Turner
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Electrocautery causes more ischemic peritoneal tissue damage than ultrasonic dissection.

Authors:  Richard P G ten Broek; Joyce Wilbers; Harry van Goor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of postoperative liver function between different dissection techniques during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tagleb S Mazahreh; Abdelwahab J Aleshawi; Nabil A Al-Zoubi; Mohammad Altabari; Qusai Aljarrah
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-02-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.