Literature DB >> 11283883

Intestinal permeability in newborns with necrotizing enterocolitis and controls: Does the sugar absorption test provide guidelines for the time to (re-)introduce enteral nutrition?

M Piena-Spoel1, M J Albers, J ten Kate, D Tibboel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), (sub)mucosal edema, hemorrhage, ulceration, or necrosis will disturb intestinal integrity, as reflected by an increased intestinal permeability. Enteral substrate is therefore withheld for a variable period up to 3 weeks (in many clinics). The authors used the sugar absorption test to measure intestinal permeability changes in surgically treated necrotizing enterocolitis patients and surgical controls to evaluate the usefulness of this test in timing the (re-)introduction of enteral feeding in NEC patients as intestinal integrity recovers.
METHODS: Changes in intestinal permeability to lactulose and rhamnose were evaluated prospectively in 13 children with NEC and 10 operated control patients. The patients were given 1 mL/kg body weight lactulose/rhamnose solution at different time intervals after admission. The lactulose to rhamnose (L/R) ratio was determined by gaschromatography in 4-hour urine samples.
RESULTS: The L/R ratios in NEC patients were increased for prolonged periods of time with a tendency to decrease in the third week after the start of NEC. However, in some cases, the increased L/R ratios even exceeded the 3-week period of starvation. High peaks in the L/R ratio were seen in patients suffering from bowel perforation or sepsis. Compared with necrotizing enterocolitis patients, L/R ratios of control patients were increased only in the first days after surgery and normalized more rapidly. The results of the L/R tests in this study corroborated the clinical condition of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The sugar absorption test shows an individual variability in the recovery of intestinal permeability in a group of seriously ill newborns with advanced stages of NEC. An individual approach in restarting enteral nutrition seems to be justified; however, the optimal time-point to restart enteral nutrition cannot be determined by the sugar absorption test alone. Combining parameters of intestinal integrity and function could enable a more accurate determination of this optimal timepoint. J Pediatr Surg 36:587-592. Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11283883     DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  25 in total

Review 1.  Small bowel review: Normal physiology, part 2.

Authors:  Alan B R Thomson; Laurie Drozdowski; Claudiu Iordache; Ben K A Thomson; Severine Vermeire; M Tom Clandinin; Gary Wild
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Novel treatments for NEC: keeping IBD in mind.

Authors:  Sanjiv Harpavat; Mohan Pammi; Mark Gilger
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-10

Review 3.  Host factors in amniotic fluid and breast milk that contribute to gut maturation.

Authors:  Carol L Wagner; Sarah N Taylor; Donna Johnson
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.667

4.  Intestinal Barrier Maturation in Very Low Birthweight Infants: Relationship to Feeding and Antibiotic Exposure.

Authors:  Bushra Saleem; Adora C Okogbule-Wonodi; Alessio Fasano; Laurence S Magder; Jacques Ravel; Shiv Kapoor; Rose M Viscardi
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Preterm infant gut microbiota affects intestinal epithelial development in a humanized microbiome gnotobiotic mouse model.

Authors:  Yueyue Yu; Lei Lu; Jun Sun; Elaine O Petrof; Erika C Claud
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.052

6.  Neurodevelopment of extremely preterm infants who had necrotizing enterocolitis with or without late bacteremia.

Authors:  Camilia R Martin; Olaf Dammann; Elizabeth N Allred; Sonal Patel; T Michael O'Shea; Karl C K Kuban; Alan Leviton
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Deletion of the heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor gene increases susceptibility to necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Andrei Radulescu; Xiaoyi Yu; Nathan D Orvets; Yan Chen; Hong-Yi Zhang; Gail E Besner
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Commensal and probiotic bacteria may prevent NEC by maturing intestinal host defenses.

Authors:  Brett M Jakaitis; Patricia W Denning
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2014-01-17

Review 9.  The role of growth factors in intestinal regeneration and repair in necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Kathryn J Rowland; Pamela M Choi; Brad W Warner
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Bifidobacteria stabilize claudins at tight junctions and prevent intestinal barrier dysfunction in mouse necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Kelly R Bergmann; Shirley X L Liu; Runlan Tian; Anna Kushnir; Jerrold R Turner; Hong-Lin Li; Pauline M Chou; Christopher R Weber; Isabelle G De Plaen
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.