Literature DB >> 11283436

Familial aggregation of submaximal aerobic performance in the HERITAGE Family study.

L Pérusse1, J Gagnon, M A Province, D C Rao, J H Wilmore, A S Leon, C Bouchard, J S Skinner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examines the contribution of genetic factors to submaximal aerobic performance phenotypes measured before and after 20 wk of endurance training.
METHODS: Submaximal oxygen consumption (VO(2)) at three power outputs, 50 W (VO(2)50W), 60% (VO(2)60%) and 80% (VO(2)80%) of VO(2max) and power outputs at 60% (PO60%) and 80% (PO80%) of VO(2max) were measured during cycle ergometer exercise tests in 483 subjects from 99 white families participating in the HERITAGE Family study. The baseline phenotypes were adjusted for the effects of age, sex, and body mass using stepwise multiple regression procedures. The response phenotypes, computed as the difference (Delta) between the posttraining and baseline measures, were adjusted for age, sex, and the baseline value.
RESULTS: All submaximal exercise phenotypes measured at baseline and in response to training were characterized by a significant familial resemblance. Maximal heritabilities of the baseline phenotypes range from 48% to 74% with significant spouse, sibling, and parent-offspring correlations. The hypothesis of maternal inheritance where mother-offspring and sibling correlations were forced to be equal was found to fit the data for VO(2)60%, VO(2)80% and PO80%. For the response phenotypes, the maximal heritabilities tended to be lower (23--57%) with a significant maternal inheritance for Delta VO(2)60%, Delta PO60%, and Delta PO80%.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the submaximal working capacities of sedentary subjects and their responses to endurance training are influenced by familial/genetic factors with a significant contribution of maternal inheritance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11283436     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200104000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  28 in total

Review 1.  Genes and human elite athletic performance.

Authors:  Daniel G Macarthur; Kathryn N North
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Genetic inheritance effects on endurance and muscle strength: an update.

Authors:  Aldo M Costa; Luiza Breitenfeld; António J Silva; Ana Pereira; Mikel Izquierdo; Mário C Marques
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Genomics and genetics in the biology of adaptation to exercise.

Authors:  Claude Bouchard; Tuomo Rankinen; James A Timmons
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.090

4.  Genetic variances and covariances of aerobic metabolic rates in laboratory mice.

Authors:  Bernard Wone; Michael W Sears; Marta K Labocha; Edward R Donovan; Jack P Hayes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Black and White race differences in aerobic capacity, muscle fiber type, and their influence on metabolic processes.

Authors:  Tyrone Ceaser; Gary Hunter
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Epigenetics in sports.

Authors:  Tobias Ehlert; Perikles Simon; Dirk A Moser
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Nurturing sport expertise: factors influencing the development of elite athlete.

Authors:  Joseph Baker; Sean Horton; Jennifer Robertson-Wilson; Michael Wall
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  High responders and low responders: factors associated with individual variation in response to standardized training.

Authors:  Theresa N Mann; Robert P Lamberts; Michael I Lambert
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Quantitative trait loci for exercise training responses in FVB/NJ and C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Michael P Massett; Ruzong Fan; Bradford C Berk
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 10.  Fat or fit: what is more important?

Authors:  Vojtech Hainer; Hermann Toplak; Vladimír Stich
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.