Literature DB >> 23329609

Epigenetics in sports.

Tobias Ehlert1, Perikles Simon, Dirk A Moser.   

Abstract

The heritability of specific phenotypical traits relevant for physical performance has been extensively investigated and discussed by experts from various research fields. By deciphering the complete human DNA sequence, the human genome project has provided impressive insights into the genomic landscape. The hope that this information would reveal the origin of phenotypical traits relevant for physical performance or disease risks has proven overly optimistic, and it is still premature to refer to a 'post-genomic' era of biological science. Linking genomic regions with functions, phenotypical traits and variation in disease risk is now a major experimental bottleneck. The recent deluge of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) generates extensive lists of sequence variants and genes potentially linked to phenotypical traits, but functional insight is at best sparse. The focus of this review is on the complex mechanisms that modulate gene expression. A large fraction of these mechanisms is integrated into the field of epigenetics, mainly DNA methylation and histone modifications, which lead to persistent effects on the availability of DNA for transcription. With the exceptions of genomic imprinting and very rare cases of epigenetic inheritance, epigenetic modifications are not inherited transgenerationally. Along with their susceptibility to external influences, epigenetic patterns are highly specific to the individual and may represent pivotal control centers predisposing towards higher or lower physical performance capacities. In that context, we specifically review how epigenetics combined with classical genetics could broaden our knowledge of genotype-phenotype interactions. We discuss some of the shortcomings of GWAS and explain how epigenetic influences can mask the outcome of quantitative genetic studies. We consider epigenetic influences, such as genomic imprinting and epigenetic inheritance, as well as the life-long variability of epigenetic modification patterns and their potential impact on phenotype with special emphasis on traits related to physical performance. We suggest that epigenetic effects may also play a considerable role in the determination of athletic potential and these effects will need to be studied using more sophisticated quantitative genetic models. In the future, epigenetic status and its potential influence on athletic performance will have to be considered, explored and validated using well controlled model systems before we can begin to extrapolate new findings to complex and heterogeneous human populations. A combination of the fields of genomics, epigenomics and transcriptomics along with improved bioinformatics tools and precise phenotyping, as well as a precise classification of the test populations is required for future research to better understand the inter-relations of exercise physiology, performance traits and also susceptibility towards diseases. Only this combined input can provide the overall outlook necessary to decode the molecular foundation of physical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23329609     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-012-0012-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  192 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic germline inheritance.

Authors:  Suyinn Chong; Emma Whitelaw
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 2.  Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals.

Authors:  Hugh D Morgan; Fátima Santos; Kelly Green; Wendy Dean; Wolf Reik
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  Population epigenetics.

Authors:  Eric J Richards
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 4.  Genetic influences in sport and physical performance.

Authors:  Zudin Puthucheary; James R A Skipworth; Jai Rawal; Mike Loosemore; Ken Van Someren; Hugh E Montgomery
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  ACTN3 genotype does not influence muscle power.

Authors:  E D Hanson; A T Ludlow; A K Sheaff; J Park; S M Roth
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.118

6.  Active recruitment of DNA methyltransferases regulates interleukin 4 in thymocytes and T cells.

Authors:  Karen W Makar; Mercedes Pérez-Melgosa; Maria Shnyreva; William M Weaver; David R Fitzpatrick; Christopher B Wilson
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2003-11-02       Impact factor: 25.606

7.  Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome.

Authors:  Jason Ernst; Manolis Kellis
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Triplex-forming DNAs in the human interphase nucleus visualized in situ by polypurine/polypyrimidine DNA probes and antitriplex antibodies.

Authors:  Mizuki Ohno; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Jeremy S Lee; Toshimichi Ikemura
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Genome-wide association study in individuals of South Asian ancestry identifies six new type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Jaspal S Kooner; Danish Saleheen; Xueling Sim; Joban Sehmi; Weihua Zhang; Philippe Frossard; Latonya F Been; Kee-Seng Chia; Antigone S Dimas; Neelam Hassanali; Tazeen Jafar; Jeremy B M Jowett; Xinzhong Li; Venkatesan Radha; Simon D Rees; Fumihiko Takeuchi; Robin Young; Tin Aung; Abdul Basit; Manickam Chidambaram; Debashish Das; Elin Grundberg; Asa K Hedman; Zafar I Hydrie; Muhammed Islam; Chiea-Chuen Khor; Sudhir Kowlessur; Malene M Kristensen; Samuel Liju; Wei-Yen Lim; David R Matthews; Jianjun Liu; Andrew P Morris; Alexandra C Nica; Janani M Pinidiyapathirage; Inga Prokopenko; Asif Rasheed; Maria Samuel; Nabi Shah; A Samad Shera; Kerrin S Small; Chen Suo; Ananda R Wickremasinghe; Tien Yin Wong; Mingyu Yang; Fan Zhang; Goncalo R Abecasis; Anthony H Barnett; Mark Caulfield; Panos Deloukas; Timothy M Frayling; Philippe Froguel; Norihiro Kato; Prasad Katulanda; M Ann Kelly; Junbin Liang; Viswanathan Mohan; Dharambir K Sanghera; James Scott; Mark Seielstad; Paul Z Zimmet; Paul Elliott; Yik Ying Teo; Mark I McCarthy; John Danesh; E Shyong Tai; John C Chambers
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Maternal ethanol consumption alters the epigenotype and the phenotype of offspring in a mouse model.

Authors:  Nina Kaminen-Ahola; Arttu Ahola; Murat Maga; Kylie-Ann Mallitt; Paul Fahey; Timothy C Cox; Emma Whitelaw; Suyinn Chong
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Physical Exercise and Epigenetic Modifications in Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Manuel Widmann; Andreas M Nieß; Barbara Munz
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Conventional and genetic talent identification in sports: will recent developments trace talent?

Authors:  Sarah Breitbach; Suzan Tug; Perikles Simon
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Epigenetics and the war on mental illness.

Authors:  J Peedicayil
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 4.  Sport and male sexuality.

Authors:  P Sgrò; L Di Luigi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Do olympic athletes train as in the Paleolithic era?

Authors:  Daniel A Boullosa; Laurinda Abreu; Adrián Varela-Sanz; Iñigo Mujika
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The Relationship between ACE, ACTN3 and MCT1 Genetic Polymorphisms and Athletic Performance in Elite Rugby Union Players: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Massimo Pasqualetti; Maria Elisabetta Onori; Giulia Canu; Giacomo Moretti; Angelo Minucci; Silvia Baroni; Alvaro Mordente; Andrea Urbani; Christel Galvani
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 7.  Exercise: putting action into our epigenome.

Authors:  Joshua Denham; Francine Z Marques; Brendan J O'Brien; Fadi J Charchar
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Does the MTHFR A1298C Polymorphism Modulate the Cardiorespiratory Response to Training?

Authors:  Paweł Cięszczyk; Aleksandra Zarębska; Zbigniew Jastrzębski; Michał Sawczyn; Izabela Kozakiewicz-Drobnik; Agata Leońska-Duniec; Mariusz Kaczmarczyk; Agnieszka Maciejewska-Skrendo; Piotr Żmijewski; Grzegorz Trybek; Wojciech Smółka; Jan Pilch; Katarzyna Leźnicka; Ewelina Lulińska-Kuklik; Marek Sawczuk; Myosotis Massidda
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Why nature prevails over nurture in the making of the elite athlete.

Authors:  Evelina Georgiades; Vassilis Klissouras; Jamie Baulch; Guan Wang; Yannis Pitsiladis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  The Great British Medalists Project: A Review of Current Knowledge on the Development of the World's Best Sporting Talent.

Authors:  Tim Rees; Lew Hardy; Arne Güllich; Bruce Abernethy; Jean Côté; Tim Woodman; Hugh Montgomery; Stewart Laing; Chelsea Warr
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.