Literature DB >> 11283252

Histone acetylation at promoters is differentially affected by specific activators and repressors.

J Deckert1, K Struhl.   

Abstract

We analyzed the relationship between histone acetylation and transcriptional regulation at 40 Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoters that respond to specific activators and repressors. In accord with the general correlation between histone acetylation and transcriptional activity, Gcn4 and the general stress activators (Msn2 and Msn4) cause increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4. Surprisingly, Gal4-dependent activation is associated with a dramatic decrease in histone H4 acetylation, whereas acetylation of histone H3 is unaffected. A specific decrease in H4 acetylation is also observed, to a lesser extent, at promoters activated by Hap4, Adr1, Met4, and Ace1. Activation by heat shock factor has multiple effects; H4 acetylation increases at some promoters, whereas other promoters show an apparent decrease in H3 and H4 acetylation that probably reflects nucleosome loss or gross alteration of chromatin structure. Repression by targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase is associated with decreased H3 and H4 acetylation, whereas repression by Cyc8-Tup1 is associated with decreased H3 acetylation but variable effects on H4 acetylation; this suggests that Cyc8-Tup1 uses multiple mechanisms to reduce histone acetylation at promoters. Thus, individual activators confer distinct patterns of histone acetylation on target promoters, and transcriptional activation is not necessarily associated with increased acetylation. We speculate that the activator-specific decrease in histone H4 acetylation is due to blocking the access or function of an H4-specific histone acetylase such as Esa1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11283252      PMCID: PMC86903          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.8.2726-2735.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  70 in total

1.  Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast.

Authors:  J J Wyrick; F C Holstege; E G Jennings; H C Causton; D Shore; M Grunstein; E S Lander; R A Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  In vivo functions of histone acetylation/deacetylation in Tup1p repression and Gcn5p activation.

Authors:  D G Edmondson; W Zhang; A Watson; W Xu; J R Bone; Y Yu; D Stillman; S Y Roth
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1998

3.  Enhancement of TBP binding by activators and general transcription factors.

Authors:  X Y Li; A Virbasius; X Zhu; M R Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme.

Authors:  L Kuras; K Struhl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The language of covalent histone modifications.

Authors:  B D Strahl; C D Allis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The organized chromatin domain of the repressed yeast a cell-specific gene STE6 contains two molecules of the corepressor Tup1p per nucleosome.

Authors:  C E Ducker; R T Simpson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Steady-state levels of histone acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J H Waterborg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  NuA4, an essential transcription adaptor/histone H4 acetyltransferase complex containing Esa1p and the ATM-related cofactor Tra1p.

Authors:  S Allard; R T Utley; J Savard; A Clarke; P Grant; C J Brandl; L Pillus; J L Workman; J Côté
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase.

Authors:  S Imai; C M Armstrong; M Kaeberlein; L Guarente
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Transcriptional factor mutations reveal regulatory complexities of heat shock and newly identified stress genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J M Treger; A P Schmitt; J R Simon; K McEntee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-10-09       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  76 in total

1.  Promoter-specific functions of CIITA and the MHC class II enhanceosome in transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Masternak; Walter Reith
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Histone acetylation: a switch between repressive and permissive chromatin. Second in review series on chromatin dynamics.

Authors:  Anton Eberharter; Peter B Becker
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Dynamics of global histone acetylation and deacetylation in vivo: rapid restoration of normal histone acetylation status upon removal of activators and repressors.

Authors:  Yael Katan-Khaykovich; Kevin Struhl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Hyperacetylation of chromatin at the ADH2 promoter allows Adr1 to bind in repressed conditions.

Authors:  Loredana Verdone; Jiansheng Wu; Kristen van Riper; Nataly Kacherovsky; Maria Vogelauer; Elton T Young; Michael Grunstein; Ernesto Di Mauro; Micaela Caserta
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Components of the SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex are required for repressed transcription of ARG1 in rich medium.

Authors:  Andrea R Ricci; Julie Genereaux; Christopher J Brandl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Post-TATA binding protein recruitment clearance of Gcn5-dependent histone acetylation within promoter nucleosomes.

Authors:  Irini Topalidou; Manolis Papamichos-Chronakis; George Thireos
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Chromatin acetylation and remodeling at the Cis promoter during STAT5-induced transcription.

Authors:  Anne Rascle; Emma Lees
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Targeted histone acetylation at the yeast CUP1 promoter requires the transcriptional activator, the TATA boxes, and the putative histone acetylase encoded by SPT10.

Authors:  Chang-Hui Shen; Benoit P Leblanc; Carolyn Neal; Ramin Akhavan; David J Clark
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Deacetylase activity is required for recruitment of the basal transcription machinery and transactivation by STAT5.

Authors:  Anne Rascle; James A Johnston; Bruno Amati
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Targeting of Swi/Snf to the yeast GAL1 UAS G requires the Mediator, TAF IIs, and RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  Karine Lemieux; Luc Gaudreau
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.