Literature DB >> 21784891

Selection bias explains apparent differential mortality between dialysis modalities.

Robert R Quinn1, Janet E Hux, Matthew J Oliver, Peter C Austin, Marcello Tonelli, Andreas Laupacis.   

Abstract

The relative risk of death for patients treated with peritoneal dialysis compared with those treated with hemodialysis appears to change with duration of dialysis therapy. Patients who start dialysis urgently are at high risk for mortality and are treated almost exclusively with hemodialysis, introducing bias to such mortality comparisons. To better isolate the association between dialysis treatment modality and patient mortality, we examined the relative risk for mortality for peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis among individuals who received ≥4 months of predialysis care and who started dialysis electively as outpatients. From a total of 32,285 individuals who received dialysis in Ontario, Canada during a nearly 8-year period, 6,573 patients met criteria for elective, outpatient initiation. We detected no difference in survival between peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis after adjusting for relevant baseline characteristics. The relative risk of death did not change with duration of dialysis therapy in our primary analysis, but it did change with time when we defined our patient population using the more inclusive criteria typical of previous studies. These results suggest that peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis associate with similar survival among incident dialysis patients who initiate dialysis electively, as outpatients, after at least 4 months of predialysis care. Selection bias, rather than an effect of the treatment itself, likely explains the previously described change in the relative risk of death over time between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21784891      PMCID: PMC3148708          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2010121232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  37 in total

1.  Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores.

Authors:  S T Normand; M B Landrum; E Guadagnoli; J Z Ayanian; T J Ryan; P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Long-term blood pressure control in a cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients and its association with residual renal function.

Authors:  M K Menon; D M Naimark; J M Bargman; S I Vas; D G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Authors:  A J Collins; W Hao; H Xia; J P Ebben; S E Everson; E G Constantini; J Z Ma
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: a reanalysis of the CANUSA study.

Authors:  Joanne M Bargman; Kevin E Thorpe; David N Churchill
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models.

Authors:  W A Ghali; H Quan; R Brant; G van Melle; C M Norris; P D Faris; P D Galbraith; M L Knudtson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Peritoneal dialysis adequacy and risk of death.

Authors:  M Rocco; J M Soucie; S Pastan; W M McClellan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Importance of dialysis adequacy in mortality and morbidity of chinese CAPD patients.

Authors:  C C Szeto; T Y Wong; C B Leung; A Y Wang; M C Law; S F Lui; P K Li
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Predicting the risk of 1-year mortality in incident dialysis patients: accounting for case-mix severity in studies using administrative data.

Authors:  Robert R Quinn; Andreas Laupacis; Janet E Hux; Matthew J Oliver; Peter C Austin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Comparative mortality of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Canada.

Authors:  S W Murphy; R N Foley; B J Barrett; G M Kent; J Morgan; P Barré; P Campbell; A Fine; M B Goldstein; S P Handa; K K Jindal; A Levin; H Mandin; N Muirhead; R M Richardson; P S Parfrey
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 10.  Peritoneal dialysis: better than, equal to, or worse than hemodialysis? Data worth knowing before choosing a dialysis modality.

Authors:  E Thodis; P Passadakis; V Vargemezis; D G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  41 in total

1.  Dialysis: Dialysis modality and survival in ESRD--is the debate over?

Authors:  Angela Yee-Moon Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Dialysis modality after renal transplant failure.

Authors:  Clare Castledine; Fergus J Caskey
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Survival by Dialysis Modality-Who Cares?

Authors:  Martin B Lee; Joanne M Bargman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Paying for Frequent Dialysis.

Authors:  Adam S Wilk; Richard A Hirth; Joseph M Messana
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 5.  Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality selection.

Authors:  Peter G Blake; Robert R Quinn; Matthew J Oliver
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Dialysis: is it realistic to compare peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis?

Authors:  Frederic O Finkelstein; Nathan W Levin
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  Incremental dialysis in ESRD: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carlo Garofalo; Silvio Borrelli; Toni De Stefano; Michele Provenzano; Michele Andreucci; Gianfranca Cabiddu; Vincenzo La Milia; Valerio Vizzardi; Massimo Sandrini; Giovanni Cancarini; Adamasco Cupisti; Vincenzo Bellizzi; Roberto Russo; Paolo Chiodini; Roberto Minutolo; Giuseppe Conte; Luca De Nicola
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.902

8.  Clinical outcome of home hemodialysis in patients with previous peritoneal dialysis exposure: evaluation of the integrated home dialysis model.

Authors:  Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette; Joanne M Bargman; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Impact of modality choice on rates of hospitalization in patients eligible for both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Authors:  Robert R Quinn; Pietro Ravani; Xin Zhang; Amit X Garg; Peter G Blake; Peter C Austin; James M Zacharias; John F Johnson; Sanjay Pandeya; Mauro Verrelli; Matthew J Oliver
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Medicare's New Prospective Payment System on Facility Provision of Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Virginia Wang; Cynthia J Coffman; Linda L Sanders; Shoou-Yih D Lee; Richard A Hirth; Matthew L Maciejewski
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.