Literature DB >> 11279582

Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs.

K A Barrie1, S L Tomak, J Cholewicki, G A Merrell, S W Wolfe.   

Abstract

The objectives of this cadaveric study were 2-fold: to determine the effect of different locking configurations on the cyclical fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs and to assess the differences between each repair when a 3-0 or 4-0 suture is used. One hundred twenty flexor digitorum profundus tendons were cut and repaired using nonlocked, simple locked, and cross-stitch locked variations of 2- and 4-strand flexor tendon repairs. Using an incremental cyclical loading protocol we performed 10 trials of each repair with both 3-0 and 4-0 sutures and analyzed the number of Newton-cycles to failure using a 3-way ANOVA. The use of a 3-0 suture led to a 2- to 3-fold increase in fatigue strength in all repairs tested and the fatigue strength of the 4-strand repairs was significantly greater than the 2-strand repairs. All repairs performed with 4-0 suture failed by suture rupture. Of the 3-0 suture repairs, the three 2-strand repairs and the 4-strand cross-stitch locked repair failed by suture rupture. In contrast, 6 of 10 of the 4-strand simple locked and nonlocked repairs failed by suture pullout. There was no significant difference in fatigue strength between the 2 locked and the nonlocked 2-strand repairs using either 3-0 or 4-0 suture. There also was no significant difference in holding capacity or fatigue strength between the simple locked or nonlocked 4-strand repairs. However, the 4-strand cross-stitch locked repair with a 3-0 suture had significantly improved fatigue strength and holding capacity compared with the other repairs tested. Based on the consistently inferior biomechanical performance of 4-0 suture, we recommend that 3-0 suture be considered for 2- or 4-strand tendon repairs when early active motion is planned. The orientation of the transverse and longitudinal components of simple locked repairs did not significantly influence their holding capacity or fatigue strength. The cross-stitch type of locked repair provides better holding capacity and fatigue strength compared with simple locked or nonlocked 4-stranded flexor tendon repairs.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11279582     DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.22926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  19 in total

1.  The Interlocking Modification of the Cross Locked Cruciate Tendon Repair (Modified Adelaide Repair): A Static and Dynamic Biomechanical Assessment.

Authors:  Ramon Tahmassebi; Tim S Peltz; Roger Haddad; Peter Scougall; Mark Gianoutsos; William Walsh
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2014-07-04

Review 2.  Biomechanical comparison of double grasping repair versus cross-locked cruciate flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  C Liam Dwyer; D Dean Dominy; Timothy E Cooney; Richard Englund; Leonard Gordon; John D Lubahn
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

3.  Does Barbed Suture Repair Negate the Benefit of Peripheral Repair in Porcine Flexor Tendon?

Authors:  Alan Sull; Serkan Inceoglu; Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-03-09

4.  Comparison of Barbed Sutures in Porcine Flexor Tenorrhaphy.

Authors:  Alan Sull; Serkan Inceoglu; Alicia August; Stephen Gregorius; Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-02

5.  Biomechanical analysis of knotless flexor tendon repair using large-diameter unidirection barbed suture.

Authors:  Toni E Lin; Chrisovalantis Lakhiani; Michael R Lee; Michel Saint-Cyr; Douglas M Sammer
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2013-09

6.  Intrasynovial flexor tendon repair: a biomechanical study of variations in suture application in human cadavera.

Authors:  Gregory N Nelson; Ryan Potter; Eleni Ntouvali; Matthew J Silva; Martin I Boyer; Richard H Gelberman; Stavros Thomopoulos
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Looped versus single-stranded flexor tendon repairs: a cadaveric mechanical study.

Authors:  Ryan P Calfee; Sean Boone; Jeffrey G Stepan; Daniel A Osei; Stavros Thomopoulos; Martin I Boyer
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 8.  Technical and biological modifications for enhanced flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  H Mike Kim; Gregory Nelson; Stavros Thomopoulos; Matthew J Silva; Rosalina Das; Richard H Gelberman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  The effect of suture caliber and number of core suture strands on zone II flexor tendon repair: a study in human cadavers.

Authors:  Daniel A Osei; Jeffrey G Stepan; Ryan P Calfee; Stavros Thomopoulos; Martin I Boyer; Ryan Potter; Richard H Gelberman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 10.  Suture techniques for tendon repair; a comparative review.

Authors:  Shelley Rawson; Sarah Cartmell; Jason Wong
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2013-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.