Literature DB >> 11278024

Relationship between NRT measurements and behavioral levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: preliminary report.

H Thai-Van1, J M Chanal, C Coudert, E Veuillet, E Truy, L Collet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Response from spiral ganglion cells to electrical stimulation via the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant can be measured using the neural response telemetry system. The purpose of this study was to assess, in children, the correlation between the neural response threshold and the behavioral levels used for cochlear implant programming process.
METHODS: The neural response telemetry test was administered to 23 children (mean age at implantation: 4 years) with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Four intra-cochlear electrodes (electrodes 5, 10, 15 and 20) were tested. The neural response threshold at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-implantation was compared with the behavioral threshold and the maximum comfort level estimated during the same periods: a Pearson's correlation test was performed for each tested electrode.
RESULTS: On apical electrodes, the correlation with the behavioral threshold remained significant from 3 to 12 months post-implantation (r ranging from 0.696 to 0.909, P<0.05), and the correlation with the maximum comfort level was also significant throughout the study period, except on electrode 15 at 9 months (tendency to significance). On basal and intermediate electrodes, statistical correlations were found only at some points of time; nonetheless, at 12 months post-implantation, a significant correlation with behavioral levels could be clearly demonstrated both on electrode 15 (r=0.914--0.778, P<0.05) and on electrode 10 (r=0.845--0.720, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that the correlation between the neural response threshold and behavioral levels may improve from the base towards the apex of the cochlea. However, a significant correlation can be demonstrated for all tested electrodes at 12 months post-implantation. During the first months post-implantation care must be exercised when interpreting neural response telemetry measurements: a positive test does not necessarily mean that the stimulus delivered to the acoustic nerve will be centrally processed with the result of an auditory perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11278024     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(01)00426-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  14 in total

1.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Behavioral Comfort Levels in Cochlear Implantees: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  S Raghunandhan; A Ravikumar; Mohan Kameswaran; Kalyani Mandke; R Ranjith
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-10-16

2.  Recommendations for Measuring the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Xiuhua Chao; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Lei Xu; Holly F B Teagle; Lisa R Park; Kevin D Brown; Michelle Shannon; Cynthia Warner; Angela Pellittieri; William J Riggs
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Efficacy of using NRT thresholds in cochlear implants fitting, in prelingual pediatric patients.

Authors:  Ahmed Allam; Ahmed Eldegwi
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-06-28

4.  Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Christine P Etlert; Sara O'Brient; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Amplitude changes of the electrically evoked compound action potential in children with cochlear implants: preliminary results.

Authors:  Alireza Pourjavid; Mansoureh Adel Ghahraman; Mahin Sedaie; Hessam-Al-Din Emamjome; Farzad Mobedshahi; Parvaneh Abbasalipour Kabirrah
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.364

6.  Technical devices for hearing-impaired individuals: cochlear implants and brain stem implants - developments of the last decade.

Authors:  Joachim Müller
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

Review 7.  The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Auditory steady state responses and cochlear implants: Modeling the artifact-response mixture in the perspective of denoising.

Authors:  Faten Mina; Virginie Attina; Yvan Duroc; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Imaging of electrode position in relation to electrode functioning after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Gijs K A van Wermeskerken; Adriaan F van Olphen; Kees Graamans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Relationship between Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds and Auditory, Language, and Speech Progress after Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy; Navid Nourizadeh; Farzad Mobedshahi; Sadegh Jafarzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.