Literature DB >> 11276543

Influence of bone densitometry results on the treatment of osteoporosis.

N S Fitt1, S L Mitchell, A Cranney, K Gulenchyn, M Huang, P Tugwell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurement of bone mineral density is widely used to diagnose osteoporosis. The objectives of this study are to determine how bone densitometry affects subsequent treatment of osteopenia and osteoporosis with either hormone replacement therapy or bisphosphonates and to examine clinical factors associated with starting either therapy after bone densitometry.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study involving women over 50 years of age who were referred to a tertiary care hospital for the first time to undergo bone density measurement using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Baseline clinical data were collected through face-to-face interviews before the test. Subsequently, the scans were reviewed and categorized as showing no bone loss, osteopenia or osteoporosis, based on World Health Organization criteria. Three months after DXA, subjects were contacted by telephone to determine their understanding of the test results and any new treatments started or recommended since the scan.
RESULTS: Of 383 women recruited at the time of their DXA, 335 (87.5%) completed the 3-month follow-up. Among those reached at follow-up, DXA results showed no bone loss in 119 (35.5%), osteopenia in 137 (40.9%) and osteoporosis in 79 (23.6%). The proportion of subjects with osteoporosis receiving either hormone replacement therapy or bisphosphonate therapy was 15.2% before the test, increasing to 63.3% after the scan. The following factors were independently associated with the initiation of either therapy: actual DXA result showing osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR] 7.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-30.3), compared with a normal scan; subjects' perception that their scan showed bone loss (osteopenia, or osteoporosis) (OR 13.5; 95% CI 4.0-45.5) or that they were unclear about the results (OR 5.4; 95% CI 1.6-18.8), compared with the perception that the results were normal; and discussion of the DXA results with a physician (OR 5.5; 95% CI 1.9-16.0).
INTERPRETATION: The proportion of women with osteoporosis receiving hormone replacement therapy or bisphosphonate therapy increases after diagnosis with densitometry. However, communication by physicians so that patients understand their test results is a critical component in the initiation of therapy after bone densitometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11276543      PMCID: PMC80872     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  12 in total

1.  Bone mineral densitometry substantially influences health-related behaviors of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  C D Marci; W B Anderson; M B Viechnicki; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Women's decisions about hormone replacement therapy after education and bone densitometry.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; W Parkinson; J Adachi; A O'Connor; E E Jolly; P Tugwell; M Bédard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about taking measures to prevent fractures.

Authors:  S M Rubin; S R Cummings
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  The contribution of bone densitometry to the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C A Coupland; I Packham; A R Lyons; C E Chilvers; D J Hosking
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Scientific Advisory Board, Osteoporosis Society of Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: clinical guidelines. International Committee for Osteoporosis Clinical Guidelines.

Authors:  P J Meunier; P D Delmas; R Eastell; M R McClung; S Papapoulos; R Rizzoli; E Seeman; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Effect of bone density information on decisions about hormone replacement therapy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  S L Silverman; M Greenwald; R A Klein; B L Drinkwater
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Randomized trial of osteoporosis screening. Use of hormone replacement therapy and quality-of-life results.

Authors:  D J Torgerson; R E Thomas; M K Campbell; D M Reid
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-13

Review 10.  Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2. The use of bone density measurement in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  W Sturtridge; B Lentle; D A Hanley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  19 in total

1.  Be careful with the term "bone loss".

Authors:  M G Donaldson; K M Khan; H A McKay; J D Wark
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Leonard MacWilliam; Lisa Lix; Patricia Caetano; Gregory S Finlayson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Correlates of use of antifracture therapy in older women with low bone mineral density.

Authors:  Kathryn M Ryder; Ronald I Shorr; Frances A Tylavsky; Andrew J Bush; Douglas C Bauer; Eleanor M Simonsick; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Osteoporosis pharmacotherapy following bone densitometry: importance of patient beliefs and understanding of DXA results.

Authors:  D Brask-Lindemann; S M Cadarette; P Eskildsen; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Correlation between patient recall of bone densitometry results and subsequent treatment adherence.

Authors:  Cynthia S Pickney; Jon A Arnason
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Relative effectiveness of osteoporosis drugs for preventing nonvertebral fracture.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Jeffrey N Katz; M Alan Brookhart; Til Stürmer; Margaret R Stedman; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01

8.  How are family physicians managing osteoporosis? Qualitative study of their experiences and educational needs.

Authors:  Susan B Jaglal; June Carroll; Gillian Hawker; Warren J McIsaac; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Suzanne M Cadarette; Cathy Cameron; Dave Davis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Direct-to-participant feedback and awareness of bone mineral density testing results in a population-based sample of mid-aged Canadians.

Authors:  E Kingwell; J C Prior; P A Ratner; S M Kennedy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Factors associated with osteoporosis screening and recommendations for osteoporosis screening in older adults.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.