Literature DB >> 11270437

Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution?

J A Andrés1, G Arnqvist.   

Abstract

To understand fully the significance of cryptic female choice, we need to focus on each of those postmating processes in females which create variance in fitness among males. Earlier studies have focused almost exclusively on the proportion of a female's eggs fertilized by different males (sperm precedence). Yet, variance in male postmating reproductive success may also arise from differences in ability to stimulate female oviposition and to delay female remating. Here, we present a series of reciprocal mating experiments among genetically differentiated wild-type strains of the housefly Musca domestica. We compared the effects of male and female genotype on oviposition and remating by females. The genotype of each sex affected both female oviposition and remating rates, demonstrating that the signal-receptor system involved has indeed diverged among these strains. Further, there was a significant interaction between the effects of male and female genotype on oviposition rate. We discuss ways in which the pattern of such interactions provides insights into the coevolutionary mechanism involved. Females in our experiments generally exhibited the weakest, rather than the strongest, response to males with which they are coevolved. These results support the hypothesis that coevolution of male seminal signals and female receptors is sexually antagonistic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11270437      PMCID: PMC1088620          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  33 in total

1.  Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males.

Authors:  T Pizzari; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Criteria for demonstrating female sperm choice.

Authors:  S Pitnick; W D Brown
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The role of male accessory gland protein Acp36DE in sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Chapman; D M Neubaum; M F Wolfner; L Partridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Sexual conflict and speciation.

Authors:  G A Parker; L Partridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Mating refusal in Musca domestica: effects of repeated mating and decerebration upon frequency and duration of copulation.

Authors:  R A Leopold; A C Terranova; E M Swilley
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1971-03

6.  Genetic basis for remating in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Response to selection based on the behavior of one sex.

Authors:  M H Gromko; M E Newport
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Evolutionary biology. All's fair when love is war.

Authors:  L Keller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Variation in sperm displacement and its association with accessory gland protein loci in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Clark; M Aguadé; T Prout; L G Harshman; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in females of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata.

Authors:  T Chapman; T Miyatake; H K Smith; L Partridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species.

Authors:  A Civetta; R S Singh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  23 in total

1.  Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila.

Authors:  L L Knowles; T A Markow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Erin Cameron; Troy Day
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Troy Day
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm?

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell; T Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Sperm numbers vary between inter- and intra-population matings of the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus.

Authors:  Klaus Reinhardt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Searching for candidate speciation genes using a proteomic approach: seminal proteins in field crickets.

Authors:  Jose A Andrés; Luana S Maroja; Richard G Harrison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Intersexual conflict over seed size is stronger in more outcrossed populations of a mixed-mating plant.

Authors:  Astrid Raunsgard; Øystein H Opedal; Runa K Ekrem; Jonathan Wright; Geir H Bolstad; W Scott Armbruster; Christophe Pélabon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Patterns of transcriptome divergence in the male accessory gland of two closely related species of field crickets.

Authors:  Jose A Andrés; Erica L Larson; Steven M Bogdanowicz; Richard G Harrison
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Roles of Female and Male Genotype in Post-Mating Responses in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sofie Y N Delbare; Clement Y Chow; Mariana F Wolfner; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  Heteropopulation males have a fertilization advantage during sperm competition in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria).

Authors:  D J Hosken; W U Blanckenhorn; T W J Garner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.