Literature DB >> 11257974

Distance perception within near visual space.

A Viguier1, G Clément, Y Trotter.   

Abstract

We investigated the perception of distance of visual targets with constant size and luminance presented between 20 and 120 cm from subjects' eyes. When retinal disparity cues were present, the subjects could reproduce very accurately the distance of a seen reference in this area. When only extraretinal information was available, distance perception was still correct for distances of 40 cm or less. However, distances beyond 60 cm were underestimated. When forced to evaluate the distance between a reference and themselves, e.g. when evaluating the absolute distance or half the distance or twice the distance of a reference, subjects used an egocentric plane of reference located on average 10.4 cm in front of their eyes. Measurements of binocular eye movements indicated a clear relationship between vergence angle and target distance. The egocentric plane of reference at 10.4 cm also corresponds to the maximum achievable vergence. These results suggest that ocular convergence can be used as a reliable cue for distance within the arm's reaching space.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11257974     DOI: 10.1068/p3119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  23 in total

1.  Perceived reachability: the roles of handedness and hemifield.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How perceived egocentric distance varies with changes in tonic vergence.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Pascaline Neveu; Olivier Sillan; Justin Plantier; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceiving a stable world during active rotational and translational head movements.

Authors:  P M Jaekl; M R Jenkin; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spaceward ho! The future of humans in space.

Authors:  Marc Heppener
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Reaching in depth: hand position dominates over binocular eye position in the rostral superior parietal lobule.

Authors:  Stefano Ferraina; Emiliano Brunamonti; Maria Assunta Giusti; Stefania Costa; Aldo Genovesio; Roberto Caminiti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Space perception of strabismic observers in the real world environment.

Authors:  Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Visual signals bias auditory targets in azimuth and depth.

Authors:  Amanda L Bowen; Ramnarayan Ramachandran; Jeffrey A Muday; James A Schirillo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perceptual averaging governs antisaccade endpoint bias.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Combined visual illusion effects on the perceived index of difficulty and movement outcomes in discrete and continuous fitts' tapping.

Authors:  Sushma Alphonsa; Boyi Dai; Tami Benham-Deal; Qin Zhu
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-23

10.  Computation of Object Size in Visual Cortical Area V4 as a Neural Basis for Size Constancy.

Authors:  Shingo Tanaka; Ichiro Fujita
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.