Literature DB >> 11248980

Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement?

L L Holt1, A J Lotto, K R Kluender.   

Abstract

For stimuli modeling stop consonants varying in the acoustic correlates of voice onset time (VOT), human listeners are more likely to perceive stimuli with lower f0's as voiced consonants--a pattern of perception that follows regularities in English speech production. The present study examines the basis of this observation. One hypothesis is that lower f0's enhance perception of voiced stops by virtue of perceptual interactions that arise from the operating characteristics of the auditory system. A second hypothesis is that this perceptual pattern develops as a result of experience with f0-voicing covariation. In a test of these hypotheses, Japanese quail learned to respond to stimuli drawn from a series varying in VOT through training with one of three patterns of f0-voicing covariation. Voicing and f0 varied in the natural pattern (shorter VOT, lower f0), in an inverse pattern (shorter VOT, higher f0), or in a random pattern (no f0-voicing covariation). Birds trained with stimuli that had no f0-voicing covariation exhibited no effect of f0 on response to novel stimuli varying in VOT. For the other groups, birds' responses followed the experienced pattern of covariation. These results suggest f0 does not exert an obligatory influence on categorization of consonants as [VOICE] and emphasize the learnability of covariation among acoustic characteristics of speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11248980     DOI: 10.1121/1.1339825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Covariation among vowel height effects on acoustic measures.

Authors:  Jeff Berry; Maura Moyle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Putting phonetic context effects into context: a commentary on Fowler (2006).

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

3.  Speech Perception Within an Auditory Cognitive Science Framework.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2008

4.  Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Natalya Kaganovich; Courtney Driscoll-Huber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast.

Authors:  John Kingston; Randy L Diehl; Cecilia J Kirk; Wendy A Castleman
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2008-01-01

8.  An analysis of the perception of stop consonants in bilinguals and monolinguals in different phonetic contexts: A range-based language cueing approach.

Authors:  Adrián García-Sierra; Elizabeth Schifano; Gianna M Duncan; Melanie S Fish
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The Effect of Dynamic Pitch on Speech Recognition in Temporally Modulated Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.