Literature DB >> 11241507

Clone heterogeneity in diploid and aneuploid breast carcinomas as detected by FISH.

F Farabegoli1, D Santini, C Ceccarelli, M Taffurelli, D Marrano, N Baldini.   

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between DNA ploidy and alterations in chromosomes 1, 8, 12, 16, 17, and 18 in 63 breast carcinoma samples by static cytofluorometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Thirty specimens were diploid and 33 were aneuploid. In aneuploid samples, the DNA index value ranged from 1.3 to 3.1, with a main peak near tetraploid values. Diploid clones were present in 21 of 33 aneuploid specimens. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis showed a heterogeneous degree of alterations in diploid specimens: one sample was normal, 16 samples had one to three chromosome alterations involving mostly chromosomes 1, 16, and 17, and 13 samples an even higher degree of alterations. The 33 aneuploid specimens showed a very high number of signals (four, five, or more). All the investigated chromosomes were affected in 23 of 33 specimens. Alterations in chromosomes 1 and 17 were detected to a similar percentage in diploid and aneuploid samples, whereas chromosome 16 monosomy was more frequent in diploid samples. Overrepresentation of chromosomes 8, 12, 16, and 18 was significantly higher in aneuploid than in diploid samples. Based on these results, we suggest that diploid and aneuploid breast carcinomas are genetically related. Chromosome 1 and 17 alterations and chromosome 16 monosomy are early changes. Allelic and chromosomal accumulations occur during progression of breast carcinoma by different mechanisms. The high clone heterogeneity found in 17 of 33 aneuploid samples could not be completely explained by endoreduplication and led to the suggestion that chromosomal instability concurs with aneuploidy development. This different evolutionary pathway might be clinically relevant because clone heterogeneity might cause metastasis development and resistance to therapy. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11241507     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0320(20010215)46:1<50::aid-cyto1037>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  18 in total

1.  Tracing the tumor lineage.

Authors:  Nicholas E Navin; James Hicks
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Establishment of cell clones with different metastatic potential from the metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma cell line MHCC97.

Authors:  Y Li; Z Y Tang; S L Ye; Y K Liu; J Chen; Q Xue; J Chen; D M Gao; W H Bao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Ploidy Variation in Fungi: Polyploidy, Aneuploidy, and Genome Evolution.

Authors:  Robert T Todd; Anja Forche; Anna Selmecki
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2017-07

Review 4.  Insight into the heterogeneity of breast cancer through next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Hege G Russnes; Nicholas Navin; James Hicks; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Tumor evolution: Linear, branching, neutral or punctuated?

Authors:  Alexander Davis; Ruli Gao; Nicholas Navin
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 10.680

6.  Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development.

Authors:  Wilma L Lingle; Susan L Barrett; Vivian C Negron; Antonino B D'Assoro; Kelly Boeneman; Wanguo Liu; Clark M Whitehead; Carol Reynolds; Jeffrey L Salisbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Nicholas Navin; Jude Kendall; Jennifer Troge; Peter Andrews; Linda Rodgers; Jeanne McIndoo; Kerry Cook; Asya Stepansky; Dan Levy; Diane Esposito; Lakshmi Muthuswamy; Alex Krasnitz; W Richard McCombie; James Hicks; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Relationship of extreme chromosomal instability with long-term survival in a retrospective analysis of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Roylance; David Endesfelder; Patricia Gorman; Rebecca A Burrell; Jil Sander; Ian Tomlinson; Andrew M Hanby; Valerie Speirs; Andrea L Richardson; Nicolai J Birkbak; Aron C Eklund; Julian Downward; Maik Kschischo; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Variable levels of chromosomal instability and mitotic spindle checkpoint defects in breast cancer.

Authors:  Dae-Sung Yoon; Robert P Wersto; Weibo Zhou; Francis J Chrest; Elizabeth S Garrett; Teag Kyu Kwon; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nicholas Navin; Alexander Krasnitz; Linda Rodgers; Kerry Cook; Jennifer Meth; Jude Kendall; Michael Riggs; Yvonne Eberling; Jennifer Troge; Vladimir Grubor; Dan Levy; Pär Lundin; Susanne Månér; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.