Literature DB >> 11241317

Altered DNA repair capacity and bleomycin sensitivity as risk markers for non-small cell lung cancer.

N Rajaee-Behbahani1, P Schmezer, A Risch, W Rittgen, K W Kayser, H Dienemann, V Schulz, P Drings, S Thiel, H Bartsch.   

Abstract

DNA repair capacity in human peripheral blood lymphocytes was monitored by the repair rate of bleomycin-induced DNA damage using an alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay). DNA repair capacity, after 15 min repair time, in lymphocytes of non-small cell lung cancer patients (n = 160) and controls (n = 180) was 67% and 79.3%, respectively (p < 0.0004). Bleomycin sensitivity defined as the tail moment of bleomycin-treated peripheral blood lymphocytes, without allowing time for DNA repair, was significantly higher in lung cancer patients than in tumor-free hospital controls (p < 0.0001). There was no correlation, in either patient or control group, between the bleomycin sensitivity and DNA repair capacity with age or gender. The median values of DNA repair capacity and sensitivity in controls were used as the cut-off points for calculating odds ratios (OR). After adjustment for age, gender and smoking status, the cases vs. controls had reduced DNA repair capacity (OR = 2.1; 95% confidence limit [CL] 1.1-4.0) and increased bleomycin sensitivity (OR = 4; 95% CL 2.2-7.4). For current smokers, the adjusted risk associated with bleomycin sensitivity was 2.3 (95% CL 1.1-4.9). We conclude that our standard comet assay as a phenotypical repair test has sufficient sensitivity and rapidity allowing application to both native and cryopreserved lymphocytes. Bleomycin sensitivity and DNA repair capacity were found to be 2 independent susceptibility markers for non-small cell lung cancer, confirming similar investigations with different marker end points. The latter were much more time consuming than the method used in our study. Thus, the comet assay is more suitable for screening large numbers of individuals in epidemiological studies. Validation of this assay in large prospective studies for the identification of subjects at high risk for non-small cell lung cancer is now warranted. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11241317     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0215(20010320)95:2<86::aid-ijc1015>3.0.co;2-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  19 in total

1.  Oxidative damage to DNA and single strand break repair capacity: relationship to other measures of oxidative stress in a population cohort.

Authors:  Andrzej R Trzeciak; Joy G Mohanty; Kimberly D Jacob; Janice Barnes; Ngozi Ejiogu; Althaf Lohani; Alan B Zonderman; Joseph M Rifkind; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  DNA repair capacity in lymphocytes of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.

Authors:  Norbert H Kleinsasser; Barbara C Wallner; Christiane Wagner; Ernst R Kastenbauer; Ulrich A Harréus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Susceptibility of peripheral lymphocytes of brain tumour patients to in vitro radiation-induced DNA damage, a preliminary study.

Authors:  Guruprasad Kalthur; Prem Kumar; Uma Devi; Sabir Ali; Ramya Upadhya; Sailaja Pillai; Anjali Rao
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Inter-individual variation in DNA repair capacity: a need for multi-pathway functional assays to promote translational DNA repair research.

Authors:  Zachary D Nagel; Isaac A Chaim; Leona D Samson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-26

5.  DNA repair and mutagen sensitivity of epithelial cells and lymphocytes in oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian Reiter; Philipp Baumeister; Sonja Jaiser; Andreas Reiss; Sabina Schwenk-Zieger; Norbert Kleinsasser; Ulrich Harréus
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Analysis of microsatellite mutations in buccal cells from a case-control study for lung cancer.

Authors:  Jessica L Baumann; Ming Li; Aslak Poulsen; Nicholson S Chadwick; Qiuyin Cai; Christine H Chung; Yu Shyr; Jørgen H Olsen; Wei Zheng; Robbert J C Slebos
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Markers of oxidant stress that are clinically relevant in aging and age-related disease.

Authors:  Kimberly D Jacob; Nicole Noren Hooten; Andrzej R Trzeciak; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 5.432

8.  Lung cancer risk and genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair pathways: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chikako Kiyohara; Koichi Takayama; Yoichi Nakanishi
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-10-14

9.  Age, sex, and race influence single-strand break repair capacity in a human population.

Authors:  Andrzej R Trzeciak; Janice Barnes; Ngozi Ejiogu; Kamala Foster; Larry J Brant; Alan B Zonderman; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.376

10.  The role of genetic factor in etiopathogenesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in young adults.

Authors:  Wojciech Gawecki; Magdalena Kostrzewska-Poczekaj; Marzena Gajecka; Piotr Milecki; Krzysztof Szyfter; Witold Szyfter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.