Literature DB >> 11240634

Attempts to molecularly distinguish cryptic taxa in Anopheles gambiae s.s.

G Gentile1, M Slotman, V Ketmaier, J R Powell, A Caccone.   

Abstract

Analyses of inversions in polytene chromosomes indicate that, in West Africa, Anopheles gambiae (sensu stricto) may be a complex of more than a single taxonomic unit, and these units have been called chromosomal forms. In order to determine whether this genetic discontinuity extends to the rest of the genome, as would be expected if reproductive isolation exists, we have sequenced several regions of both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. With one exception, we were unable to identify any nucleotide sites that differentiate the chromosomal forms. The exception was the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA). Three sites in this region distinguish Mopti chromosomal form from Savanna and Bamako in Mali and Burkina Faso. However, outside these two countries, the association between chromosomal form and rDNA type does not always hold. Together with the variants in the rDNA intergenic spacer (IGS) described in the accompanying papers (della Torre et al., 2001; Favia et al., 2001), we can recognize two major types of rDNA, Type I and Type II (corresponding to molecular forms S and M in della Torre et al., 2001). Type I is widespread in West Africa and is the only type found outside of West Africa (i.e. Tanzania and Madagascar). Type II is confined to West Africa. We were unable to detect any heterozygosity for the ITS types even in five collections containing both types. A sample from the island of São Tomé could not be classified into either Type I or Type II as the rDNA had characteristics of both. In general, our results confirm that An. gambiae is not a single pan-mictic unit, but exactly how to define any new taxa remains problematic. Finally, we have found minor variants of the major rDNA types fixed in local populations; contrary to most previous studies, this suggests restricted gene flow among populations of this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11240634     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00237.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Mol Biol        ISSN: 0962-1075            Impact factor:   3.585


  42 in total

1.  No evidence for biased co-transmission of speciation islands in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Matthew W Hahn; Bradley J White; Christopher D Muir; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Gene flow-dependent genomic divergence between Anopheles gambiae M and S forms.

Authors:  David Weetman; Craig S Wilding; Keith Steen; João Pinto; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Reduced recombination rate and genetic differentiation between the M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s.

Authors:  Michel A Slotman; Lisa J Reimer; Tara Thiemann; Guimogo Dolo; Etienne Fondjo; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Ecological zones rather than molecular forms predict genetic differentiation in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. in Ghana.

Authors:  Alexander E Yawson; David Weetman; Michael D Wilson; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Comparative analyses reveal discrepancies among results of commonly used methods for Anopheles gambiaemolecular form identification.

Authors:  Federica Santolamazza; Beniamino Caputo; Maria Calzetta; José L Vicente; Emiliano Mancini; Vincenzo Petrarca; João Pinto; Alessandra della Torre
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Sex-linked differentiation between incipient species of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Aram D Stump; Jennifer A Shoener; Carlo Costantini; N'Fale Sagnon; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  When genetic distance matters: measuring genetic differentiation at microsatellite loci in whole-genome scans of recent and incipient mosquito species.

Authors:  R Wang; L Zheng; Y T Touré; T Dandekar; F C Kafatos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Dry season reproductive depression of Anopheles gambiae in the Sahel.

Authors:  Alpha S Yaro; Adama I Traoré; Diana L Huestis; Abdoulaye Adamou; Seydou Timbiné; Yaya Kassogué; Moussa Diallo; Adama Dao; Sékou F Traoré; Tovi Lehmann
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.354

9.  Spatial swarm segregation and reproductive isolation between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Abdoulaye Diabaté; Adama Dao; Alpha S Yaro; Abdoulaye Adamou; Rodrigo Gonzalez; Nicholas C Manoukis; Sékou F Traoré; Robert W Gwadz; Tovi Lehmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Authentication scheme for routine verification of genetically similar laboratory colonies: a trial with Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Elien E Wilkins; Paula L Marcet; Alice C Sutcliffe; Paul I Howell
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 2.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.