Literature DB >> 11240112

ERP time course of perceptual and post-perceptual mechanisms of spatial selection.

J M Shedden1, C L Nordgaard.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from volunteers performing a task requiring simple judgements about the spatial location of a single target that could appear with equal probability to the left or right of fixation. A robust finding in the ERP literature is a dichotomy between attentional selection for spatial and non-spatial features. Visual spatial selection is manifest as a modulation of early components (P1, N1) that reveal exogenous processes, while non-spatial selection is revealed by the presence of longer latency endogenous components (N2). We present an analysis of several conditions that require different degrees of visual analysis to confirm the location of the single target, and show that spatial selection can be manifest at early (N1) or later (N2) stages. Observers identified the location of targets that were more salient (2D line drawings with abrupt onset) or less salient (2D line drawings without abrupt onset or 3D objects embedded in random-dot stereograms). We examined differences in amplitude, latency, and topography of early ERP components (P1, N1, P2, N2), and compared responses measured over the left and right hemispheres in response to left and right targets. The results support the hypothesis that the processes involved in spatial selection can be manifest at early or late stages, dependent on the quality of the incoming data. Moreover, the iterative process by which the percept is established benefits from a change in the visual input that is specific to the target.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11240112     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00064-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  11 in total

1.  How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Dragan Rangelov; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for cognitive control during conflict processing in visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Stefanie Kehrer; Antje Kraft; Kerstin Irlbacher; Stefan P Koch; Herbert Hagendorf; Norbert Kathmann; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-03

3.  Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: event-related potential evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Lori B Astheimer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

4.  Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Markus Conci; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Edmund Wascher; Peter Keller; Iring Koch; Gisa Aschersleben; David A Rosenbaum; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of task order predictability in audio-visual dual task performance: Just a central capacity limitation?

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-11

7.  Contralateral and ipsilateral motor activation in visual simple reaction time: a test of the hemispheric coactivation model.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Michael Zehetleitner; Klaus Gramann; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What are task-sets: a single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations?

Authors:  Dragan Rangelov; Thomas Töllner; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Sustained posterior contralateral activity indicates re-entrant target processing in visual change detection: an EEG study.

Authors:  Daniel Schneider; Sven Hoffmann; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.