Literature DB >> 11233903

Comparison between antigenemia and a quantitative-competitive polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection after heart transplantation.

L F Camargo1, D E Uip, A A Simpson, O Caballero, N A Stolf, L S Vilas-Boas, C S Pannuti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antigenemia and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are widely used for cytomegalovirus (CMV) diagnosis after heart transplantation due to their enhanced predictive values for disease detection when specific cut-off values are used. The purpose of this study was to compare, in the same patient setting, the predictive values of quantitative PCR and antigenemia for CMV disease detection, using specific cut-off values.
METHODS: Thirty heart transplant receptors were ch prospectively monitored for active CMV infection and disease detection, using quantitative PCR and anti- po genemia. Positive and negative predictive values for pr CMV disease detection were calculated using cut-off pr values for both antigenemia (5 and 10 positive cells/300,000 neutrophils) and quantitative-PCR (50,000 and 100,000 copies/10(6) leukocytes).
RESULTS: Active CMV infection was diagnosed in 93.3% of patients and CMV disease in 23.3%. The positive and negative predictive (%) values for CMV disease detection were 35/100 and 46.7/100, respectively, for quantitative PCR and antigenemia. Using 5 and 10 positive cells/300,000 neutrophils as cut-off values for antigenemia, the positive and negative predictive values (%) for disease detection were respectively 63.6/100 and 70/100. For quantitative PCR, the positive and th negative predictive values (%) for cut-off values of to 50,000 and 100,000 copies/10(6) leukocytes were 53.8/100 and 60/94.1, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In our series, antigenemia and quantitative-PCR had enhanced and similar predictive values for CMV disease detection when specific cut-off values were used. The choice between these two methods for disease detection may rely less on their efficiency and more on the experience and familiarity with them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11233903     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200102150-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

1.  Real-time PCR assay compared to nested PCR and antigenemia assays for detecting cytomegalovirus reactivation in adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Junji Ikewaki; Eiichi Ohtsuka; Rie Kawano; Masao Ogata; Hiroshi Kikuchi; Masaru Nasu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Immunosuppressive therapy in older cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Arezu Zejnab Aliabadi; Andreas Oliver Zuckermann; Michael Grimm
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Comparison of quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA by real-time PCR in whole blood with the cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay.

Authors:  Seonhee Kwon; Bo Kyeung Jung; Sun-Young Ko; Chang Kyu Lee; Yunjung Cho
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation: clinical aspects, management and the perspectives.

Authors:  Lúcio Roberto Requião-Moura; Ana Cristina Carvalho deMatos; Alvaro Pacheco-Silva
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

5.  Clinical validation of an in-house quantitative real time PCR assay for cytomegalovirus infection using the 1st WHO International Standard in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Cassia F B Caurio; Odelta S Allende; Roger Kist; Kênya L Santos; Izadora C S Vasconcellos; Franciéli P Rozales; Daiane F Dalla Lana; Bruno M Praetzel; Ana Paula Alegretti; Alessandro C Pasqualotto
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.