Literature DB >> 11231751

Monitoring and ensuring safety during clinical research.

M A Morse1, R M Califf, J Sugarman.   

Abstract

Increased numbers of clinical trials, many of which are large, multicenter, and sometimes international, and the marked shift of funding for clinical trials to industry have made apparent the inadequacy of mechanisms for protecting human subjects that were developed when clinical research was generally carried out on a small scale at single institutions. To address concerns regarding the protection of human subjects, a group of professionals with expertise in various aspects of clinical trials was assembled in May 2000. Participants described and evaluated the mechanisms by which clinical trials are monitored, focusing on adverse event reporting and the processes by which various parties with oversight responsibilities interact in the course of these trials. In this article, we describe the manner in which adverse event reporting might function to enhance safety and the role of data monitoring committees in using aggregate data from these reports, outline the problems that now exist for institutional review boards as they are faced with multiple adverse event reports from clinical trials while conducting continuing review, and offer recommendations for improving the current approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11231751     DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.9.1201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  9 in total

1.  Data quality strategies in cohort studies: lessons from a study on delirium in nursing home elders.

Authors:  Mary J Dyck; Kennith Culp; Pamela Z Cacchione
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.257

2.  The automation of clinical trial serious adverse event reporting workflow.

Authors:  Jack W London; Karl J Smalley; Kyle Conner; J Bruce Smith
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 3.  Ethics and research in critical care.

Authors:  Henry J Silverman; Francois Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Principles for defining adverse events in behavioral intervention research: lessons from a family-focused adolescent drug abuse trial.

Authors:  Viviana E Horigian; Michael S Robbins; Roberto Dominguez; Jessica Ucha; Carmen L Rosa
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Designing Oversight for Nanomedicine Research in Human Subjects: Systematic Analysis of Exceptional Oversight for Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Cortney Jones
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  When does quality improvement count as research? Human subject protection and theories of knowledge.

Authors:  J Lynn
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-02

7.  Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  A R Stark; J E Tyson; P L Hibberd
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 8.  Proactive compared with passive adverse event recognition: calcium channel blocker-associated edema.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Are institutional review boards prepared for active continuing review?

Authors:  Yashashri C Shetty; Kshitij S Jadhav; Aafreen A Saiyed; Akshay U Desai
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2014-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.