Literature DB >> 11231706

Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?

V J Canzanello1, P L Jensen, G L Schwartz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aneroid sphygmomanometer is commonly used for the indirect measurement of blood pressure despite significant concerns about its accuracy. Although the mercury sphygmomanometer is highly accurate, there are concerns about the environmental toxicity of mercury. In response to various external pressures to become essentially mercury free, the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, has replaced many mercury sphygmomanometers with aneroid devices. Since 1993, a maintenance protocol has been in place to ensure proper function and accuracy of these devices.
METHODS: We assessed the accuracy of 283 aneroid devices using as the reference standard a digital pressure and vacuum meter that was calibrated using a mercury sphygmomanometer.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD values from the aneroid device in millimeters of mercury at each reference point (at 20-mm Hg intervals from 60 to 240 mm Hg defined by the reference device) were 59.9 +/- 1.9 at 60; 79.9 +/- 1.9 at 80; 100.0 +/- 1.8 at 100; 120.3 +/- 1.8 at 120; 140.7 +/- 1.4 at 140; 160.7 +/- 1.7 at 160; 180.9 +/- 1.3 at 180; 200.7 +/- 5.0 at 200; 221.0 +/- 1.3 at 220; and 240.8 +/- 1.6 at 240 (r = 0.99; P<.001). The values from the aneroid device underestimated those of the reference device by a mean of 0.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.7). Virtually 100% of the values from the aneroid device were within the 4-mm Hg range recommended by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
CONCLUSION: Aneroid sphygmomanometers provide accurate pressure measurements when a proper maintenance protocol is followed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11231706     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.5.729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  20 in total

Review 1.  Are pitfalls of oxcillometric blood pressure measurements preventable in children?

Authors:  Lavjay Butani; Bruce Z Morgenstern
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  The extent of inaccurate aneroid sphygmomanometers in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Dimitri A Cozanitis; Christopher J Jones
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-07

3.  History and Justification of a National Blood Pressure Measurement Validated Device Listing.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen; Raj S Padwal; Michael Gutkin; Beverly B Green; Michael J Bloch; F Wilford Germino; Domenic A Sica; Anthony J Viera; Benjamin M Bluml; William B White; Sandra J Taler; Steven Yarows; Daichi Shimbo; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 4.  A diagnostic approach for the child with hypertension.

Authors:  Natasa Marcun Varda; Alojz Gregoric
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Using simplified blood pressure tables to avoid underdiagnosing childhood hypertension.

Authors:  Ajay P Sharma; Javed Mohammed; Benson Thomas; Ram N Singh; Guido Filler
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  Utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents.

Authors:  John W Graves; Mohammed Mahdi Althaf
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  How are hypertensive children evaluated and managed? A survey of North American pediatric nephrologists.

Authors:  Robert P Woroniecki; Joseph T Flynn
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.

Authors:  Yong Ma; Marinella Temprosa; Sarah Fowler; Ronald J Prineas; Maria G Montez; Janet Brown-Friday; Mary L Carrion-Petersen; Tracy Whittington
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  Bhaskar Shahbabu; Aparajita Dasgupta; Kaushik Sarkar; Sanjaya Kumar Sahoo
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

10.  Agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.

Authors:  Wenjie Yang; Dongfeng Gu; Jing Chen; Cashell E Jaquish; D C Rao; Xigui Wu; James E Hixson; Xiufang Duan; Tanika N Kelly; L Lee Hamm; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.378

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.