D Li1, J Zheng, H J Weinmann. 1. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School, 448 E Ontario St, Ste 700, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. d-li2@northwestern.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of an intravascular contrast agent, gadomer-17, in improving magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of coronary arteries with that of an extravascular agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine, in pigs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight pigs underwent imaging after three injections: 0.20 mmol of gadopentetate dimeglumine per kilogram of body weight and 0.05 and 0.10 mmol/kg gadomer-17. Coronary images were acquired repeatedly after each injection by using an inversion-recovery-prepared segmented three-dimensional sequence with either breath holding (n = 4) or respiratory gating (n = 4). Coronary artery-to-myocardium contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were compared between injections. RESULTS: At breath-hold imaging, substantial CNR improvement over precontrast images was observed in images acquired during the first pass of gadopentetate dimeglumine in coronary arteries and up to 6 and 10 minutes after 0.05 and 0.10 mmol/kg of gadomer-17 injections, respectively. The CNR with 0.10 mmol/kg of gadomer-17 was 20% (P <.05) higher than that with gadopentetate dimeglumine at first-pass imaging. At respiratory-gated imaging, significant CNR improvement (P <.05) over precontrast images was observed in images acquired up to 10, 30, and 50 minutes after gadopentetate dimeglumine and both gadomer-17 injections, respectively. The CNR on the first images obtained after 0.10 mmol/kg gadomer-17 injection was 168% (P <.05) higher than that on the images obtained after gadopentetate dimeglumine injection. CONCLUSION: Gadomer-17 provided greater and more persistent CNR improvements than did gadopentetate dimeglumine; further evaluation of its utility for coronary imaging in humans is warranted.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of an intravascular contrast agent, gadomer-17, in improving magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of coronary arteries with that of an extravascular agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine, in pigs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight pigs underwent imaging after three injections: 0.20 mmol of gadopentetate dimeglumine per kilogram of body weight and 0.05 and 0.10 mmol/kg gadomer-17. Coronary images were acquired repeatedly after each injection by using an inversion-recovery-prepared segmented three-dimensional sequence with either breath holding (n = 4) or respiratory gating (n = 4). Coronary artery-to-myocardium contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were compared between injections. RESULTS: At breath-hold imaging, substantial CNR improvement over precontrast images was observed in images acquired during the first pass of gadopentetate dimeglumine in coronary arteries and up to 6 and 10 minutes after 0.05 and 0.10 mmol/kg of gadomer-17 injections, respectively. The CNR with 0.10 mmol/kg of gadomer-17 was 20% (P <.05) higher than that with gadopentetate dimeglumine at first-pass imaging. At respiratory-gated imaging, significant CNR improvement (P <.05) over precontrast images was observed in images acquired up to 10, 30, and 50 minutes after gadopentetate dimeglumine and both gadomer-17 injections, respectively. The CNR on the first images obtained after 0.10 mmol/kg gadomer-17 injection was 168% (P <.05) higher than that on the images obtained after gadopentetate dimeglumine injection. CONCLUSION:Gadomer-17 provided greater and more persistent CNR improvements than did gadopentetate dimeglumine; further evaluation of its utility for coronary imaging in humans is warranted.
Authors: Clemens C Cyran; Yanjun Fu; Victor Rogut; Bundit Chaopathomkul; Michael F Wendland; David M Shames; Robert C Brasch Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Kai Nassenstein; Kai-Uwe Waltering; Sebastian Kelle; Thomas Schlosser; Frank Breuckmann; Stefan Maderwald; Peter Hunold; Eike Nagel; Jörg Barkhausen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-08-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Richard M McCarthy; Vibhas S Deshpande; Nirat Beohar; Sheridan N Meyers; Steven M Shea; Jordin D Green; Xin Liu; Xiaoming Bi; F Scott Pereles; John Paul Finn; Charles J Davidson; James C Carr; Debiao Li Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Kyle S McCommis; Thomas A Goldstein; Dana R Abendschein; Pilar Herrero; Bernd Misselwitz; Robert J Gropler; Jie Zheng Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-11-20 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Karolien Jaspers; Bas Versluis; Tim Leiner; Petra Dijkstra; Marlies Oostendorp; Jolanda M van Golde; Mark J Post; Walter H Backes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 3.240