Literature DB >> 11230635

Renal tolerance of a neutral gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) in patients with chronic renal failure: results of a randomized study.

B Tombach1, C Bremer, P Reimer, K Kisters, R M Schaefer, V Geens, W Heindel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the renal tolerance of 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol as an electrically neutral contrast agent at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with impaired renal function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with impaired renal function were enrolled in this prospective randomized study and classified into two subgroups according to their creatinine clearance: group 1 (n = 12), less than 80 mL/min (<1.33 mL/sec) and greater than 30 mL/min (>0.50 mL/sec); group 2 (n = 9), less than 30 mL/min (<0.50 mL/sec) and not requiring dialysis. Gadobutrol (1.0 mol/L) was injected intravenously at randomly assigned doses of either 0.1 or 0.3 mmol per kilogram of body weight. Changes in vital signs, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis results, including creatinine clearance, were monitored before, at 6 hours, and then every 24 hours until 72 hours (group 1) or 120 hours (group 2) after intravenous injection of gadobutrol. Hematologic results were checked every other day.
RESULTS: No serious adverse event occurred, and no clinically relevant changes in vital signs, hematologic results, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis results were detected in the observation period. Markers for glomerular filtration (creatinine, cystatin C, beta2-microglobulin, creatinine clearance) and tubular function (N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, alpha1-microglobulin) were unaffected by gadobutrol in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Gadobutrol did not affect renal function and, therefore, proved to be a safe MR contrast agent in patients with impaired renal function. Even in patients with marginal excretory function (creatinine clearance, <30 mL/min [<0.50 mL/sec]), prehydration or treatment with diuretics or hemodialysis are not required after the administration of gadobutrol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11230635     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr12651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  Contrast media in magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Georg M Bongartz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Gadobutrol: a review of its use for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in adults and children.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Post-marketing surveillance of gadobutrol for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshito Tsushima; Kazuo Awai; Gen Shinoda; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Masayuki Chosa; Toshiyuki Sunaya; Jan Endrikat
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Spurious hypocalcemia after gadodiamide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher D Moore; Robert C Newman; James G Caridi
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines.

Authors:  Fulvio Stacul; Aart J van der Molen; Peter Reimer; Judith A W Webb; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos; Torsten Almén; Peter Aspelin; Marie-France Bellin; Olivier Clement; Gertraud Heinz-Peer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Quantitative analysis of late gadolinium enhancement in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison of diagnostic performance in myocardial fibrosis between gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Dongting Liu; Xiaohai Ma; Jiayi Liu; Lei Zhao; Hui Chen; Lei Xu; Zhonghua Sun; Zhanming Fan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  One-molar gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) as a contrast agent for CT angiography of the thoracic and abdominal aorta.

Authors:  José M Esteban; Antonio Alonso; Vicente Cervera; Vicente Martínez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Current techniques for assessment of upper extremity vasculature prior to hemodialysis vascular access creation.

Authors:  R N Planken; J H M Tordoir; L E M Duijm; M W de Haan; T Leiner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The use of lysosomal enzymuria in the early detection and monitoring of the progression of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Donatien Gatsing; Ibrahim Hassan Garba; Godwin I Adoga
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2006-09

10.  Comparison between a linear versus a macrocyclic contrast agent for whole body MR angiography in a clinical routine setting.

Authors:  Achim Seeger; Ulrich Kramer; Michael Fenchel; Florian Grimm; Christiane Bretschneider; Jörg Döring; Bernhard Klumpp; Gunnar Tepe; Kilian Rittig; Peter R Seidensticker; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.