Literature DB >> 11224883

Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery with individual templates and comparison to conventional operation method.

K Birnbaum1, E Schkommodau, N Decker, A Prescher, U Klapper, K Radermacher.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Comparison was made of the accuracy of a pedicle bore performed by conventional technique and by using an individual template in the lumbar spine of cadavers.
OBJECTIVES: The fixation of pedicle screws necessitates a high amount of surgical skill and experience to avoid lesions of nerves and vessels. By using individual templates in a cadaver study the goal was to prove the accuracy and efficiency of this less-invasive image-guided surgery in comparison with the conventional technique by fluoroscopy and computed tomographic (CT) scan. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Based on three-dimensional models generated from CT scans of the lumbar spine, precise preoperative planning of the position and trajectory of pedicle screws is possible. In comparison with other means of computer-assisted spine surgery with navigation systems, in which a time-consuming intraoperative matching of the bone surface structure is necessary, the use of individual templates enables the surgeon to reduce the operation time considerably.
METHODS: Individual templates are customized on the basis of three-dimensional reconstructions of the bone structures extracted from CT image data and depending on the individual preoperative surgical planning, which uses the desktop image processing system for orthopedic surgery (DISOS). A desktop-computer-controlled milling device is used as a three-dimensional printer to automatically mold the shape of small reference areas of the bone surface into the body of the template. Postoperative CT scans were obtained and the accuracy of the pedicle bore rated by two independent observers.
RESULTS: The preparation time with the individual template lasted slightly longer than with the conventional operation technique (555 seconds and 482 seconds, respectively). Fluoroscopic study took a mean time of 31.5 seconds, with the conventional operation technique and 5.5 seconds with the individual template. The assessment of the postoperative CT scans demonstrated a higher accuracy of the pedicle bore with the individual template.
CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric study has shown that overall operation time including the fluoroscopy time can be shortened by using the individual template for the pedicle bore. The individual template is an alternative to the computer-assisted navigation systems with a good cost-performance ratio without excessive technical workload on the physicians or the surgical personnel. Further investigations must be conducted to validate the clinical applicability of this system.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11224883     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  Tailor-made Surgical Guide Reduces Incidence of Outliers of Cup Placement.

Authors:  Takehito Hananouchi; Masanobu Saito; Tsuyoshi Koyama; Nobuhiko Sugano; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Design of a 3D navigation template to guide the screw trajectory in spine: a step-by-step approach using Mimics and 3-Matic software.

Authors:  Zhen-Hua Feng; Xiao-Bin Li; Kevin Phan; Zhi-Chao Hu; Kai Zhang; Jie Zhao; Wen-Fei Ni; Ai-Min Wu
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

3.  Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Aichmair; M Moser; M R Bauer; E Bachmann; J G Snedeker; M Betz; M Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Additive-manufactured patient-specific titanium templates for thoracic pedicle screw placement: novel design with reduced contact area.

Authors:  Mitsuru Takemoto; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Eigo Ota; Bungo Otsuki; Hiroaki Kimura; Takeshi Sakamoto; Toshiyuki Kawai; Tohru Futami; Kiyoyuki Sasaki; Tomiharu Matsushita; Takashi Nakamura; Masashi Neo; Shuich Matsuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Advances in 3D Modeling: Preoperative Templating for Revision Wrist Surgery.

Authors:  Liza Osagie; Shalin Shaunak; Aasim Murtaza; Sonja Cerovac; Shamim Umarji
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-11-29

6.  Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent patients with severe spinal deformities: a retrospective study comparing drill guide template with free-hand technique.

Authors:  Yue Pan; G H Lü; Lei Kuang; Bing Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lumbar and sacral pedicle screw placement using a template does not improve the midterm pain and disability outcome in comparison with free-hand method.

Authors:  Matjaz Merc; Gregor Recnik; Zmago Krajnc
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-19

8.  An automatic and patient-specific algorithm to design the optimal insertion direction of pedicle screws for spine surgery templates.

Authors:  Francesco Naddeo; Emilio Cataldo; Alessandro Naddeo; Nicola Cappetti; Nicola Narciso
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Reduction of radiation dose during facet joint injection using the new image guidance system SabreSource: a prospective study in 60 patients.

Authors:  Dirk Proschek; K Kafchitsas; M A Rauschmann; A A Kurth; T J Vogl; Florian Geiger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Michael Betz; Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Manuel Moser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.