Literature DB >> 11224186

Factors influencing the reinforcing and subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.

L.D. Chait1.   

Abstract

The reinforcing and subjective effects of oral d-amphetamine (AMP) were studied in a group of non-drug abusing adults (16 males, 13 females). A discrete-trial choice procedure was used to assess the reinforcing effects of a single dose of AMP (range 7.5-20mg across subjects). A number of factors (gender, current and past drug use, personality, motor activity, and baseline mood state and psychophysiological and sensory indices of arousal) were examined in an attempt to explain both within- and between-subject variability in response to AMP. Of the 29 subjects, 11 chose AMP on either two or three out of a possible three occasions. Cigarette smokers reported stronger aversive responses to AMP and chose the drug significantly less often than non-smokers. Subjects with a history of non-medical stimulant use reported less subjective response to AMP than subjects without such history. Within-subject variability in AMP choice was related to variability in subjective response to the drug across choice trials, as well as to variability in baseline mood: AMP was more likely to be chosen when subjects were more aroused and in a more positive mood at the time of the choice. These results provide new information regarding factors that may be relevant in determining individual differences in vulnerability to abuse of psychomotor stimulants.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 11224186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  16 in total

1.  Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-amphetamine and sensation-seeking status.

Authors:  Thomas H Kelly; Glenn Robbins; Catherine A Martin; Mark T Fillmore; Scott D Lane; Nancy G Harrington; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.

Authors:  Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.153

3.  The reinforcing, subject-rated, performance, and cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine: influence of sensation-seeking status.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; C Glenn Robbins; Catherine A Martin; Craig R Rush; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Methamphetamine Addiction Vulnerability: The Glutamate, the Bad, and the Ugly.

Authors:  Karen K Szumlinski; Kevin D Lominac; Rianne R Campbell; Matan Cohen; Elissa K Fultz; Chelsea N Brown; Bailey W Miller; Sema G Quadir; Douglas Martin; Andrew B Thompson; Georg von Jonquieres; Matthias Klugmann; Tamara J Phillips; Tod E Kippin
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Human sex differences in d-amphetamine self-administration.

Authors:  Andrea R Vansickel; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Relationship between oral D-amphetamine self-administration and ratings of subjective effects: do subjective-effects ratings correspond with a progressive-ratio measure of drug-taking behavior?

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Anna R Reynolds; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 7.  Do initial responses to drugs predict future use or abuse?

Authors:  Harriet de Wit; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Methamphetamine-alcohol interactions in murine models of sequential and simultaneous oral drug-taking.

Authors:  Elissa K Fultz; Douglas L Martin; Courtney N Hudson; Tod E Kippin; Karen K Szumlinski
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Acute d-amphetamine pretreatment does not alter stimulant self-administration in humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Andrea R Vansickel; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Performance and subjective effects of diazepam and d-amphetamine in high and low sensation seekers.

Authors:  Thomas H Kelly; Timothy A Delzer; Catherine A Martin; Nancy G Harrington; Lon R Hays; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.