Literature DB >> 17011712

The reinforcing, subject-rated, performance, and cardiovascular effects of d-amphetamine: influence of sensation-seeking status.

William W Stoops1, Joshua A Lile, C Glenn Robbins, Catherine A Martin, Craig R Rush, Thomas H Kelly.   

Abstract

Individual differences that may contribute to vulnerability to abuse drugs have been identified. Sensation-seeking status has been shown to influence both vulnerability to drug use and response to acute drug administration. The purpose of the present experiment was to examine the reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine in high and low sensation-seeking subjects using a modified progressive-ratio procedure. A battery of subject-rated, performance, and cardiovascular measures was also included to better characterize the effects of d-amphetamine in these groups. Ten high sensation seekers and ten low sensation seekers that were matched for education, age, drug use, height, and weight, first sampled doses of d-amphetamine (0, 8, and 16 mg). In subsequent sessions, subjects were offered the opportunity to work for the sampled dose on a modified progressive-ratio procedure. d-Amphetamine functioned as a reinforcer and produced prototypical stimulant-like effects (e.g., increased subject-ratings of Like Drug, enhanced performance, and increased heart rate). High sensation seekers were more sensitive than low sensation seekers to the reinforcing and some of the subject-rated effects of d-amphetamine. The results of the present experiment extend those of previous findings by demonstrating that the reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine vary as a function of the biologically based sensation-seeking personality trait. These results suggest that increased stimulant drug use and abuse among high sensation seekers may be related, in part, to increased sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of stimulants among these individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17011712      PMCID: PMC3191905          DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  45 in total

1.  Individual differences in mood reactions to d-amphetamine: a test of three personality factors.

Authors:  P J Corr; V Kumari
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.153

2.  Effects of d-amphetamine in human models of information processing and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Mark T Fillmore; Thomas H Kelly; Catherine A Martin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction.

Authors:  Mary Jeanne Kreek; David A Nielsen; Eduardo R Butelman; K Steven LaForge
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Reinforcing effects of diazepam under anxiogenic conditions in individuals with social anxiety.

Authors:  Todd C Helmus; Manuel Tancer; Chris-Ellyn Johanson
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Choice between money and intranasal heroin in morphine-maintained humans.

Authors:  S D Comer; E D Collins; M W Fischman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.293

6.  Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons.

Authors:  M Zuckerman; S Eysenck; H J Eysenck
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1978-02

7.  Reinforcing and subject-rated effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in non-drug-abusing humans.

Authors:  C R Rush; W D Essman; C A Simpson; R W Baker
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.153

Review 8.  Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention.

Authors:  J D Hawkins; R F Catalano; J Y Miller
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Factors influencing marijuana self-administration by humans.

Authors:  M Haney; S D Comer; A S Ward; R W Foltin; M W Fischman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Alcohol choice and amphetamine effects in light and moderate drinkers.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Mark T Fillmore; Melania S Poonacha; Joe E Kingery; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  40 in total

1.  Human behavioral pharmacology, past, present, and future: symposium presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Behavioral Pharmacology Society.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Harriet de Wit; Stephen T Higgins; Galen R Wenger; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Mary Jeanne Kreek
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Effects of 24 hours of tobacco withdrawal and subsequent tobacco smoking among low and high sensation seekers.

Authors:  Dustin C Lee; Kenneth A Perkins; Eli Zimmerman; Glenn Robbins; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Influence of neurobehavioral incentive valence and magnitude on alcohol drinking behavior.

Authors:  Jane E Joseph; Xun Zhu; Christine R Corbly; Stacia DeSantis; Dustin C Lee; Grace Baik; Seth Kiser; Yang Jiang; Donald R Lynam; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Comparison of the behavioral and cardiovascular effects of intranasal and oral d-amphetamine in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Joshua A Lile; Shanna Babalonis; Cleeve Emurian; Catherine A Martin; Daniel P Wermeling; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 5.  Individual differences and social influences on the neurobehavioral pharmacology of abused drugs.

Authors:  M T Bardo; J L Neisewander; T H Kelly
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.

Authors:  Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.153

7.  Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of d-amphetamine: Dimensions of impulsivity.

Authors:  Arit Harvanko; Catherine Martin; Joshua Lile; Richard Kryscio; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  A multivariate assessment of individual differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as predictors of amphetamine self-administration and prefrontal dopamine function in rats.

Authors:  Julie A Marusich; Mahesh Darna; Richard J Charnigo; Linda P Dwoskin; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  The amphetamine response moderates the relationship between negative emotionality and alcohol use.

Authors:  Kenneth J D Allen; Frances H Gabbay
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Acute d-amphetamine pretreatment does not alter stimulant self-administration in humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Andrea R Vansickel; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.