Literature DB >> 11224114

The effects of amphetamine, apomorphine, SKF 38393, quinpirole and bromocriptine on responding for conditioned reward in rats.

R.J. Beninger1, R. Ranaldi.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of the dopamine (DA) D1 selective agonist, SKF 38393, and the D2 selective agonists, quinpirole and bromocriptine, on responding for conditioned reward. The nonselective DA agonist apomorphine and the indirect agonist amphetamine, were also evaluated. Male rats (n = 302) were tested in a procedure consisting of three distinct phases. During the pre-exposure phase the rats were exposed to an operant chamber containing two levers; one lever produced a lights-off stimulus (3s) and the other a tone stimulus (3s). This was followed by 4 conditioning sessions during which the levers were removed and rats received pairings of the lights-off stimulus (80 per day) and food, presented according to a variable time 45s schedule. Two test sessions followed during which the levers were present and the number of responses made on each lever was calculated as a ratio of the number of responses made during pre-exposure. Drugs were administered prior to each test session. A saline group showed a higher ratio of responding for the lights-off stimulus than the tone stimulus, indicating that the lights-off stimulus had become a conditioned reward. Amphetamine (0.01-2.0mg/kg) and to a lesser extent, quinpirole (0.01-5.0mg/kg) and bromocriptine (0.05-10.0mg/kg) dose-dependently increased responding and specifically enhanced responding on the lever producing the conditioned reward. Apomorphine (0.1-5.0mg/kg) increased responding on both levers at higher doses but the conditioned reward effect was lost. SKF 38393 (0.1-10.0mg/kg) appeared to impair the acquisition of responding for conditioned reward. The results were interpreted as indicating that responding for conditioned reward may be dependent on a D1 receptor-mediated reward signal.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 11224114     DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199204000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  19 in total

1.  Responding for a conditioned reinforcer or unconditioned sensory reinforcer in mice: interactions with environmental enrichment, social isolation, and monoamine reuptake inhibitors.

Authors:  Caleb J Browne; Paul J Fletcher; Fiona D Zeeb
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of pramipexole on the acquisition of responding with opioid-conditioned reinforcement in the rat.

Authors:  Jeremiah W Bertz; Jianyong Chen; James H Woods
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor agonists and antagonists on responding for a conditioned reinforcer and its enhancement by methylphenidate.

Authors:  Paul J Fletcher; Fiona D Zeeb; Caleb J Browne; Guy A Higgins; Ashlie D Soko
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Differential ability of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor agonists to induce and modulate expression and reinstatement of cocaine place preference in rats.

Authors:  Danielle L Graham; Regis Hoppenot; April Hendryx; David W Self
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The effects of adolescent methylphenidate self-administration on responding for a conditioned reward, amphetamine-induced locomotor activity, and neuronal activation.

Authors:  Christie L Burton; José N Nobrega; Paul J Fletcher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Dopaminergic mechanisms of reinstatement of MDMA-seeking behaviour in rats.

Authors:  S Schenk; D Gittings; J Colussi-Mas
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Effects of d-fenfluramine and metergoline on responding for conditioned reward and the response potentiating effect of nucleus accumbens d-amphetamine.

Authors:  P J Fletcher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Decreased Incentive Motivation Following Knockout or Acute Blockade of the Serotonin Transporter: Role of the 5-HT2C Receptor.

Authors:  Caleb J Browne; Paul J Fletcher
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Effect of conditioning with d-amphetamine on the extracellular concentration of dopamine and its metabolites in the striatum of behaving rats.

Authors:  S Dietze; K Kuschinsky
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Synergistic interaction between caloric restriction and amphetamine in food-unrelated approach behavior of rats.

Authors:  Kristine L Keller; Fiori R Vollrath-Smith; Mehrnoosh Jafari; Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.