Literature DB >> 11223283

Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions from apical and basal perilymphatic electrode positions in the guinea pig cochlea.

A L Nuttall1, J Zheng, T Ren, E de Boer.   

Abstract

Stimulation of the cochlea with sinusoidal current results in the production of an otoacoustic emission at the primary frequency of the stimulus current. In this study we test the hypothesis that the wide frequency response from round window (RW) stimulation is due to the involvement of a relatively large spatial segment of the organ of Corti. Tonotopically organized group delays would be evident from perilymphatic electrode locations that restrict the spatial extent of hair cell stimulation. Monopolar and bipolar-paired stimulus electrodes were placed in perilymphatic areas of the first or third cochlear turns and the electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions (EEOAE) produced by these electrodes were compared to that from the RW monopolar electrode in the anesthetized guinea pig. Current stimuli of 35 microA RMS were swept across the frequency range between 60 Hz and 100 kHz. The EEOAE was measured using a microphone coupled to the ear canal. It was found that the bandwidth of EEOAEs from RW stimulation extended to at least 40 kHz and was a relatively insensitive to electrode location on the RW. The group delay of the EEOAE from stimulation at the RW membrane (corrected to stapes motion) was about 53 micros. First and third turn stimulations from electrode placements in perilymph near the bony wall of cochlea yielded narrower band EEOAE magnitude spectra but which had the same short group delays as for RW stimulation. A confined current (from a bipolar electrode pair) applied close to the basilar membrane (BM) in the first turn produced the narrowest frequency-band magnitude emissions and a mean corrected group delay of 176 micros for a location approximately 3 mm from the high frequency end of the BM (corresponding to about the 18 kHz best frequency location). Bipolar electrodes in the third turn scala tympani produced low pass EEOAE magnitude functions with corrected group delays ranging between approximately 0.3 and 1 ms. The average phase slopes did not change with altered cochlear sensitivity and postmortem. These data indicate that the EEOAE from RW stimulation is the summed response from a wide-tonotopic distribution of outer hair cells. A preliminary model study indicates that short time delayed emissions are the result of a large spatial distribution of current applied to perilymphatic locations possibly giving rise to "wave-fixed" emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11223283     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00238-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Long-term effects of acoustic trauma on electrically evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Kirin Halsey; Karen Fegelman; Yehoash Raphael; Karl Grosh; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

2.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Non-uniform distribution of outer hair cell transmembrane potential induced by extracellular electric field.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Teresa M Wilson; Tao Wu; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Electrically evoked auditory nerve responses in the cochlea with normal outer hair cells.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Menghe Guo; Wenxuan He; Josef M Miller; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2009-12-01

5.  Vanilloid receptors in hearing: altered cochlear sensitivity by vanilloids and expression of TRPV1 in the organ of corti.

Authors:  Jiefu Zheng; Chunfu Dai; Peter S Steyger; Youngki Kim; Zoltan Vass; Tianying Ren; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Altered traveling wave propagation and reduced endocochlear potential associated with cochlear dysplasia in the BETA2/NeuroD1 null mouse.

Authors:  Anping Xia; Ann Marie B Visosky; Jang-Hyeon Cho; Ming-Jer Tsai; Fred A Pereira; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-08-15

7.  Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.

Authors:  Mika Sato; Peter Baumhoff; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  State dependent effects on the frequency response of prestin's real and imaginary components of nonlinear capacitance.

Authors:  Joseph Santos-Sacchi; Dhasakumar Navaratnam; Winston J T Tan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.