Literature DB >> 23641142

In Silico Promoter Analysis can Predict Genes of Functional Relevance in Cell Proliferation: Validation in a Colon Cancer Model.

Alan C Moss1, Peter P Doran, Padraic Macmathuna.   

Abstract

Specific combinations of transcription-factor binding sites in the promoter regions of genes regulate gene expression, and thus key functional processes in cells. Analysis of such promoter regions in specific functional contexts can be used to delineate novel disease-associated genes based on shared phenotypic properties. The aim of this study was to utilize promoter analysis to predict cell proliferation-associated genes and to test this method in colon cancer cell lines. We used freely-available bioinformatic techniques to identify cell-proliferation-associated genes expressed in colon cancer, extract a shared promoter module, and identify novel genes that also contain this module in the human genome. An EGRF/ETSF promoter module was identified as prevalent in proliferation-associated genes from a colon cancer cDNA library. We detected 30 other genes, from the known promoters of the human genome, which contained this proliferation-associated module. This group included known proliferation-associated genes, such as HERG1 and MCM7, and a number of genes not previously implicated in cell proliferation in cancer, such as TSPAN3, Necdin and APLP2. Suppression of TSPAN3 and APLP2 by siRNA was performed and confirmed by RT-PCR. Inhibition of these genes significantly inhibited cell proliferation in colon cancer cell lines. This study demonstrates that promoter analysis can be used to identify novel cancer-associated genes based on shared functional processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell proliferation; colorectal cancer; promoter modules

Year:  2007        PMID: 23641142      PMCID: PMC3634709     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Oncogenomics        ISSN: 1177-2727


Background

The methods of analysis of the colon cancer transcriptome described thus far produce large quantities of data in their output (Alon et al. 1999; Saha et al. 2001). Given the often arbitrary nature of the statistical thresholds for determining disease association, the functional relevance of many “over-expressed” genes is often unclear (Kothapalli et al. 2002; Troyanskaya, 2005). The absence of hypothesis in many microarray papers has yielded as many questions as answers (Shih et al. 2005). One approach to this “data overload” is to focus on specific biological processes rather than individual genes that are altered in malignant cells. Such processes are driven by transcription factors that are common to genes which share similar functional contexts e.g. proliferation, invasion (Qiu, 2003; Werner, 2001). The promoter regions of these genes contain patterns of transcription factor binding sites (promoter modules) that form the basis for such co-regulation. These modules contain at least two transcription factor binding sites separated by a defined distance (Fessele et al. 2002). By identifying the promoter modules prevalent in genes that are known to share a common biological function, one can use these as a starting point to detect previously unknown genes that are involved in this process (Werner, 2001). The presence of these modules in a genes’ promoter region can positively or negatively influence functional processes. In this manner, a network of co-regulated genes can be determined that are implicated in specific processes (Liu et al. 2003). This approach has been used successfully in detecting interferon-responsive genes in inflammation, and novel cell-junction associated proteins (Cohen et al. 2006; Klingenhoff et al. 1999). The purpose of this study was to use bioinformatic techniques to determine promoter modules common to those genes in the colon cancer transcriptome that are involved in cell proliferation. In this paper we utilize an integrated bioinformatics pathway to identify novel genes associated with cell proliferation in colon cancer, and validate this approach in an in vitro model.

Methods

Bioinformatic techniques

An outline of the bioinformatics pipeline is illustrated in Figure 1. A transcriptional profile of colorectal cancer was produced by comparing cDNA libraries obtained from normal colon and colon carcinoma with Digital Differential Display (DDD), as previously described (Moss et al. 2006). Briefly, the relative abundance of ESTs in colon cancer libraries was compared to normal tissue libraries, and those genes significantly over-expressed in colon cancer were extracted. The output was ontologically classified using Onto-Express to select those transcripts associated with cell proliferation (Khatri et al. 2002). The accession numbers of these transcripts were uploaded to Gene2Promoter (Genomatix Software GmbH), a software program that allowed identification of promoter regions based on the individual transcripts in a gene expression profile (Werner, 2001). The promoter sequences from Gene2Promoter were submitted to Frame-Worker, (FrameWorker, 2006) and once a model common to the input promoters was identified, its presence was screened for in known promoters of the human genome using Model Inspector (Model Inspector 2006). Briefly, all matches for individual elements of the module which score above a pre-set threshold are located in the promoter database. These individual elements are combined to match the organization (element order and distances) of the input module, to evaluate the fit of the model. Finally, Bibliosphere was utilized to examine the characteristics of selected genes based on the published literature (Scherf et al. 2005).
Figure 1

Summary of bioinformatics methods used. References for each method contained in text.

Gene expression

Public gene expression repositories derived from microarray data from normal colon, colonic cancers and colon cancer cell lines, were interrogated for genes of interest. The normal colon microarray profile originated from pooled samples from normal colonic tissue (Gene Expression Omnibus tissue GSM44680) hybridized to the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Array (Ge et al. 2005). The results are expressed in log2 of user-provided counts for comparison to other normal tissues. Colon cancer tissue expression profile was obtained from the transcriptome of 10 colorectal adenocarcinomas hybridized to the U95a Affymetrix GeneChip and compared to other human cancers (Su et al. 2001). Finally, the microarray data from a primary colon cancer (SW480) and a metastatic colon cancer cell line (SW620) hybridized to the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Array was surveyed (Provenzani et al. 2006). The results are expressed in log2 of user-provided counts for comparison between the cell lines.

Cell lines

The Caco2 human colonocyte cell line was purchased form ATCC (LGC Promochem, U.K.) and the T84 cells were a kind gift from Dr. Cormac Taylor, UCD. Cell lines were cultured in minimum essential medium (Caco2) or mixture of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium and Ham’s F12 medium under standard conditions (T84).

siRNA transfection

Prior to transfection 1×105 cells were seeded in 500 μl of medium in each well of a 24 well plate and cultured until 50–80% confluent (∼24 hours). For transfection, 0.5 μg of custom-designed siRNA (Dharmacon, IL, U.S.A.) was diluted in 100 μl medium and 1.5 μl RNAifect transfection reagent added (Qiagen, U.K.) at a 1:3 ratio and added to each well as per protocol. Three controls were used for each experiment; a positive control of laminin siRNA for mRNA quantification, a positive control of fluorescent-labeled siRNA for microscopy, and negative controls of medium only, transfection reagent only and scrambled siRNA only. The transfected cells were incubated for 24 hours under normal conditions.

RT-PCR

RNA extraction was subsequently performed from cells using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, U.K.), and reverse transcribed using SuperScript II (Promega, U.K.). Quantitative PCR was performed using an ABIPrism Taqman PCR machine. Expression levels of individual genes were normalized to 18s RNA.

Cell proliferation assay

In order to determine the effect of siRNA on cell proliferation rates, transfected CaCO2 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a concentration of 1×104 cells in 100 μl per well and allowed to adhere overnight. The MTS cell proliferation assay (Promega, U.K.) was used to assess proliferation rates at 48 hours, based on absorbance at 490 nm in an ELISA plate reader. Proliferation ratios were based on comparison of mean absorbance values for transfected and untransfected wells using one-way ANOVA.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of laboratory results was performed using StatView software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Normalised gene expression was analysed using ANOVA, after testing for equality of variance. A p < 0.05 was considered significant. The differential expression profiles, promoter analysis and module detection all contain integral statistical thresholds for results as described in the results section.

Results

An EGRF/ETSF transcription factor module is prevalent in cell proliferation-associated genes over-expressed in colorectal cancer

Digital Differential Display comparison of normal colon to colorectal cancer cDNA libraries identified 163 transcripts differentially expressed in colon cancer, of which 16 were classified as involved in cellular proliferation (supplementary 1)(Moss et al. 2006). These 16 genes were the source material for promoter screening. The loci of these 16 genes were entered into Gene2Promoter, which detected 30 unique promoters assigned to 30 transcripts in the mapped regions; all transcripts with at least one exon identical to one of the mapped exons and their promoters were listed (Table 1). Fifteen of these promoters had been experimentally verified, and the other 15 were computational predictions based in sequence location and content.
Table 1

Genes associated with cell proliferation in colon cancer that had promoter regions identified (verified = published experimental verification, predicted = transcript with 5’ end confirmed by Gene2Promoter 2004).

mRNALocusTranscript/TSSQuality Level
NM_002394SLC3A2 (Loc 6520)AK090758_1Verified
AK094620_1Verified
NM_002394Predicted
NM_005916MCM7AK055379_1Verified
AK096959_1Verified
NM_005916Predicted
NM_014865CNAP1AK022511_1Verified
AK125155_1Verified
AK128354_1Verified
NM_001034RRM2AK092671_1Verified
AK123010_1Verified
NM_001034Predicted
NM_002707PPM1GAK127593_1Verified
NM_002707Predicted
NM_177983Predicted
NM_000077CDKN2ANM_058195Predicted
NM_016343CENPFNM_016343Predicted
NM_002447MST1RNM_002447Predicted
NM_001255CDC20NM_001255Predicted
NM_004526MCM2AK128291_1Verified
NM_005186CAPN1AK025380_1Verified
AK097277_1Verified
NM_005186Predicted
NM_004494HDGFAK096411_1Verified
NM_004494Predicted
NM_003334UBE1AK097343_1Verified
NM_003334Predicted
NM_002335LRP5NM_002335Predicted
NM_002032FTH1NM_002032Predicted
NM_005030PLKNM_005030Predicted
The identified promoter sequences were investigated using FrameWorker software, which detects patterns in transcription factor binding sites (TFBS). We searched for modules containing at least 2 elements (TFBS), at a distance of 5–50 nucleotides apart, and adjusted the quorum constraint (prevalence threshold) until the program identified a common module. No individual module was common to all the input promoter sequences. However, one complex module, containing members of the EGRF and ETSF transcription factor binding site families, was present in 18/30 (60%) of the input promoters (Fig. 2). The specificity score of this model had a p-value of 0.0059 e.g. the probability that an equal or greater number of sequences with a model match would be obtained in a randomly drawn sample of the same size as the input sequence set. The relative occurrence of individual model matches in a background promoter sequence set of 5000 human promoters scanned with this module was 0.27 and 0.50 for EGRF and ETSF respectively.
Figure 2

EGRF/ETSF module is common to proliferation genes expressed in colon cancer. EGRF element (purple), ETSF element (yellow) and combined module (grey) location in promoter region of representative sample of input loci relative to transcription start site (TSS, red arrow). Graphical output generated by FrameWorker software.

This EGRF/ETSF module contains members of the Early Growth Response Factor family and the ETS factor family at a distance of 6–44 base pairs between elements. The matrices (transcription factors) of the EGRF family were EGR1, EGR2, EGR3, EGR4 and Wilms tumour suppressor. The re-value, an expectation value of the number of matches per 1000 base pairs of random DNA sequence for each individual matrix, ranged from 0.03–0.35 for the EGRF elements. ETS1, ETS2, ELK1 and NRF2 were the components of the ETSF element, with re-values of <0.01–2.05. The free version of the software does not detail the exact sequences of the modules, as it is their relative location, rather than sequence, that determines a module’s functional activity.

The EGRF/ETSF module identifies novel proliferation-associated genes

The known promoters of the human genome were screened for the EGRF/ETSF module using Model Inspector, based not on sequence alignment, but detection of individual elements and their position relative to each other. At the time of the experiment, the database contained 46,119 promoters with known transcripts. A total of 102 matches for the selected proliferation-associated module were detected in 30 genes (Table 2). All matches contained a model score of ≥85% specificity. The chromosomal locations of these genes were widely dispersed throughout the genome, excluding the possibility of co-regulation due to overlapping sequences (data not shown).
Table 2

Identified genes that contain the EGRF/ETSF promoter module in their promoter regions.

AccessionGeneaModel scoreEffect on proliferationbExpression in colon cancercPublic microarray datadReferences
AB000381GML89%negativeYes - in cell linesNoOncogene 1996; 13 (9) 1965–7. Int J Clin Oncol. 2001 Apr; 6(2):90–6
AB001517TMEM190%??No
AB001523PWP290%??No
AB003173WRN90%positiveYes – in unmethylated tumoursYesDNA Repair 2004; 3(5): 475–482 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006 Jun 6; 103(23):8822–7
AB003469MCM590%?YesYesClin Cancer Res. 1999 Aug; 5(8):2121–32
AB004270MCM790%positive?YesOncogene 2006; 25(7): 1090–9
AB005647NPR290%??No
AB006075HMG-CoA synthase89%?YesNoMol Carcinog. 2001 Nov; 32(3):154–66.
AB006684AIRE91%??No
AB007828NDN88%negative?NoGene 1998; 213(1–2): 65–72
AB008496COL4A390%negative?NoJ Biol Chem 2000; 275 (28):21340–8
AB008502TLX290%??No
AB008681ACVR2B92%positiveYes – in cell linesNoDev Biol 2004; 266(2): 334–45 Gut. 2001 Sep; 49(3):409–17
AB008822TNFRSF1 1B92%negative?NoJ Clin Invest 2001; 107(10):1235–4
AB009071KCNH288%positiveYesYesJ Biol Chem 2003; 278(5):2947–55 Cancer Res. 2004 Jan 15; 64(2):606–11
AB009667Klotho95%??No
AB009777NID285%??No
AB012286ITGB490&positive?YesCancer Res 2005; 65(23):10674–9
AB012668hFUCT-791%??No
AB015751APLP296%??No
AB016243SLC9A3R291%??No
AB016656LIMK2b91%??No
AB016767TERT95%??No
AB017018HNRPDL94%??Yes
AB017547SPR93%??Yes
AB017567LIPT195%??No
AB017602PDE9A90%??Yes
AB018192PHC195%??No
AB018401DHH90%positive?NoDevelopment 2004 Oct; 131(20):5009–19
AK001326TSPAN390%positive?YesJ Cell Biol 153:295–305

HUGO accepted gene name

Published experimental evidence of effect on cell proliferation

Experimental evidence of increased protein or mRNA expression in colon cancer

Upregulation of gene in public microarray database of expression relative to normal (Diehn et al. 2003)

The products of the 30 genes were entered into Bibliosphere (Bibliosphere, 2006) to determine their functional context based on the scientific literature e.g. published experimental evidence of a role in affecting cellular proliferation (Table 2). Eleven of these genes (37%) have been implicated in cell proliferation in the literature, including KCNH2 and MCM7 (Lastraioli et al. 2004; Yoshida et al. 2003) (Table 2). Six of the genes have been described in the literature as expressed in colonic neoplasia based on experimental data, and nine are up-regulated in colon cancer gene expression profiles in public databases (Table 2) (Diehn et al. 2003). As a control functional context, a common disease process, inflammation, was explored in the 30 identified genes using Bibliosphere; only one (TLX2) has been associated with inflammation (data not shown).

Suppression of TSPAN3 and APLP2 inhibits cell proliferation in colorectal cell lines

The experiments above identified genes containing a promoter module that is frequently present in genes associated with cell proliferation in colon cancer. In order to determine the functional significance of the presence of this module in these genes, the role of their knock-down by siRNA on cell proliferation was determined. We screened the identified genes using Bibliosphere for 1) reports of expression in colon cancer, 2) reports of a role in cell proliferation (Table 2). As our interest was in novel proliferation-associated genes which may be relevant to colon cancer, we selected three genes not previously reported as altered in colon cancer; TSPAN3, NDN and APLP2. They have been described as having positive, negative and unknown roles in cell proliferation (Taniura et al. 1999; Tiwari-Woodruff et al. 2001). The TSPAN3 gene contains the EGRF/ETSF module at position 491-418 on the negative strand at 15q24.3. The APLP2 gene contained the EGRF/ETSF module at position 2492–2532 on the positive strand at 11q24. The NDN gene contained the EGRF/ETSF module at position 1268-1179 on the negative strand at 15q11.2-q12. Gene expression of each gene in colon cancer was first measured from 3 diverse microarray databases; one from 36 types of normal tissue, one from 174 epithelial tumors that included 10 colorectal adenocarcinomas, and a third from primary and metastatic colorectal cell lines (Ge, Yamamoto, Tsutsumi, Midorikawa, Ihara, Wang and Aburatani, 2005; Provenzani, Fronza, Loreni, Pascale, Amadio and Quattrone, 2006; Su, Welsh, Sapinoso, Kern, Dimitrov, Lapp, Schultz, Powell, Moskaluk, Frierson, Jr. and Hampton, 2001). Both TSPAN3 and APLP2 were expressed in normal colon, and colon cancer cell lines, although only TSPAN3 was relatively over-expressed in colonic adenocarcinoma tissue relative to other tumours (Figure 3). NDN was not expressed in normal colon, adenocarcinoma or colon cancer cell lines.
Figure 3

TSPAN3 and APLP2 are expressed in normal and neoplastic colon. Expression of TSPAN3, APLP2 and NDN in microarray profiles of: (a) normal colon (Log2 of user-provided count of gene expression on oligonucleotide microarray (Affymetrix U133) using pooled RNA) (b) primary colon cancer cell line (black bars) and metastatic colon cancer cell line (grey bars) (Log2 of user-provided count of gene expression on oligonucleotide microarray (Affymetrix U133) using pooled RNA) (c) 174 human epithelial tumors (Co; colon samples, red, increased gene expression; green, decreased expression; black, median level of gene expression. The color intensity is proportional to the hybridization intensity of a gene from its median level across all samples.

Cells were transfected with siRNA designed to provide at least 70% silencing of expression, and mRNA levels and cell proliferation quantified (Reynolds et al. 2004). TSPAN3 expression in T84 colon cancer cell line was confirmed by RT-PCR (Fig. 4a). siRNA caused a 62% inhibition of TSPAN3 expression at 24 hours (Fig. 4a, p < 0.05). Confirmation of cellular uptake was observed using the labeled fluorescent siRNA (Fig. 4b). This led to a 40% reduction in cellular proliferation at 48 hours in T84 cells (Fig. 4c, p < 0.05). Neither scrambled siRNA or transfection agent alone affected cell proliferation. APLP2 expression in colon cancer cells was confirmed by RT-PCR (Fig. 5a). siRNA caused a 45% inhibition of APLP2 expression at 24 hours (Fig. 5a, p < 0.05). Confirmation of cellular uptake was observed using the labeled fluorescent siRNA (Fig. 5b). This inhibition led to a 40% reduction in cellular proliferation at 48 hours in CaCo2 cells (Fig. 5c, p < 0.05). Neither scrambled siRNA or transfection agent alone affected cell proliferation.
Figure 4

Inhibition of TSPAN3 expression by siRNA inhibits colon cell line proliferation. (a) RNA extracted from transfected and untransfected T84 cells after 24 hours was reverse transcribed to cDNA and probed for TSPAN3 using Taqman PCR (expressed in arbitrary units normalised to 18s RNA). (b) T84 cells in a 96-well plate were transfected with a control fluorescent-labeled siRNA to confirm transfection efficiency. (c) Proliferation of transfected T84 cells in a 96-well plate was assessed after 24 hours using the MTS Cell Proliferation Assay. Control = media only, vehicle = media and transfection agent (Lipofectamine), scrambled siRNA = transfection agent and scrambled siRNA, and TSPAN3 siRNA = custom-designed TSPAN3 siRNA (10 nm)

Figure 5

Inhibition of APLP2 expression by siRNA inhibits colon cell line proliferation. (a) RNA extracted from transfected and untransfected T84 cells after 24 hours was reverse transcribed to cDNA and probed for APLP2 using Taqman PCR (expressed in arbitrary units normalised to 18s RNA) (b) T84 cells in a 96-well plate were transfected with a control fluorescent-labeled siRNA to confirm transfection efficiency (c) Proliferation of transfected T84 cells in a 96-well plate was assessed after 24 hours using the MTS Cell Proliferation Assay. Control = media only, vehicle = media and transfection agent (Lipofectamine), scrambled siRNA = transfection agent and scrambled siRNA, and APLP2 siRNA = custom-designed APLP2 siRNA (10 nm)

Discussion

This study has demonstrated the use of promoter modules as bioinformatic “bait” to delineate key regulatory networks in colon cancer, and to identify novel biological players in cell proliferation. It is based on the premise that genes expressed in similar disease states share a common “footprint” of transcriptional regulatory processes for specific functional activities. The relative order and spacing of these transcription factor (TF) binding sites (TFBSs) within a module are often highly conserved through evolution, highlighting their importance in regulation. This conservation allows us to use computational searching to pinpoint these clusters of known TF binding sites rather than specific nucleotide sequences (Berman et al. 2002). Although the shared process selected for this study, proliferation, is not unique to cancer cells, it is a dominant process that partially defines this disease state. The presence of the EGRF/ETSF module in the promoter region of genes associated with cell proliferation suggests a role for this module in the regulation of cellular proliferative activity (Lantingavan, I et al. 2005). Although this influence could be positive or negative, its frequency in the promoter regions of over-expressed genes in colon cancer cDNA libraries, compared to random promoter sets, suggests a pro-proliferative effect in this setting. The experimental data clearly suggests a role for the studied genes in cell proliferation, although whether this is actually dependent on the identified promoter module, would require further studies. This strategy predicted a role for TSPAN3 in cell proliferation in colorectal cancer that has not previously been described. TSPAN3 is a member of the tetraspanin family of cell surface receptors that have been implicated in the cell proliferation process in oligodendrocytes (Tiwari-Woodruff, Buznikov, Vu, Micevych, Chen, Kornblum and Bronstein, 2001). Our data demonstrating its expression in normal and neoplastic colon, and the negative effects of its inhibition on cell proliferation in colon cancer cell lines, confirming the predicted role based on promoter analysis. Further work will be required to determine whether this effect is unique to colon cancer cells, and which component of proliferation is involved. APLP2 is an amyloid-like protein precursor that plays a role in G-coupled signaling. It may be required for epithelial cell growth in wounds (Siemes et al. 2006). This study suggests a role for APLP2 in colon cancer cell proliferation, which may be due to its key function in genomic segregation (von der et al. 1994). Although this study validates this approach in identifying co-regulated genes, the activation of the promoters involved has not been experimentally tested. As this work focuses on functionally relevant associations between genes and disease, we sought to examine the functional end-point primarily. The confirmation of alterations in expression and proliferation validates the computational predictions. We have not focused on the descriptive aspects of the module discussed e.g. sequence, as it is the strategic organization of the EGRF/ETSF matrix in the promoters of interest, rather than sequence composition, that confers its functional properties (Dohr et al. 2005). Our intention was proof-of-concept evidence that could validate this bioinformatic approach. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that an integrated in silico promoter analysis approach can be used to delineate novel cancer-associated genes. We have described a previously unreported role for TSPAN3 and APLP2, in cell proliferation in colon cancer based on a common promoter module. Further study of this module may provide increased understanding of this regulatory network.
AccessionClusterNameExpressionFold Diff
NM_001644.2560apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide 1 (APOBEC1)Exclusive54
NM_001804.11545caudal type homeo box transcription factor 1 (CDX1)Exclusive14
NM_005814143131glycoprotein A33 (transmembrane) (GPA33)Exclusive11
NM_001986.177711ets variant gene 4 (E1A enhancer binding protein, E1AF) (ETV4)Significant20
NM_001265.277399caudal type homeo box transcription factor 2 (CDX2)Significant20
NM_138768.1116051myeloma overexpressed gene positive multiple myelomas) (MYEOV)Significant14
NM_004963.11085guanylate cyclase 2C (heat stable enterotoxin receptor) (GUCY2C)Significant13
NM_024017.386327homeo box B9 (HOXB9)Significant6
XM_032721.3109358ATPase, Class V, type 10B (ATP10B)Significant5
NM_033266.1114905ER to nucleus signalling 2 (ERN2)Significant4
NM_019010.184905cytokeratin 20 (KRT20)Significant4
NM_005310.186859growth factor receptor-bound protein 7 (GRB7)Significant4
NM_001738.123118carbonic anhydrase I (CA1)Significant4
NM_004306.1181107annexin A13 (ANXA13)Significant3
NM_007028.291096tripartite motif-containing 31 (TRIM31)Significant
NM_001500.11054435GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (GMDS)Preferential39
NM_005628.1183556solute carrier family 1 (neutral amino acid transporter), member 5 (SLC1A5)Preferential36
NM_002276.2182265keratin 19 (KRT19)Preferential33
NM_001569.2182018interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1)Preferential23
NM_002295356261laminin receptor 1 (67kD, ribosomal protein SA) (LAMR1)Preferential19
NM_001402493552eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 (EEF1A1)Preferential19
NM_002087180577granulin (GRN)Preferential19
NM_006597180414heat shock 70kD protein 8 (HSPA8)Preferential18
NM_005507170622cofilin 1 (non-muscle) (CFL1)Preferential17
NM_001903254321catenin (cadherin-associated protein), alpha 1 (102kD) (CTNNA1)Preferential17
NM_002819172550polypyrimidine tract binding protein 1 (PTBP1)Preferential17
NM_007363355861non-POU domain containing, octamer-binding (NONO)Preferential17
NM_002568poly(A) binding protein, cytoplasmic 1 (PABPC1)Preferential16
NM_006516169902solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 1 (SLC2A1)Preferential16
NM_002046glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPD)Preferential16
NM_003906389037MCM3 minichromosome maintenance deficient 3 protein (MCM3AP)Preferential15
NM_00443367928E74-like factor 3 (ets domain transcription factor, epithelial-specific ) (ELF3)Preferential14
NM_007127166068villin 1 (VIL1)Preferential14
NM_000218367809potassium voltage-gated channel, KQT-like subfamily, member 1 (KCNQ1)Preferential13
NM_003379403997villin 2 (ezrin) (VIL2)Preferential13
NM_001084153357procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 3 (PLOD3)Preferential12
NM_005789152978proteasome (prosome, macropain) activator subunit 3 (PSME3)Preferential12
NM_005561150101lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1)Preferential11
NM_005080437638X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1)Preferential11
NM_002105H2A histone family, member X (H2AFX)Preferential11
NM_004429144700ephrin-B1 (EFNB1)Preferential10
NM_014498golgi phosphoprotein 4 (GOLPH4)Preferential9
139800high-mobility group (nonhistone chromosomal) protein isoforms (HMGIY)Preferential9
NM_007052132370NADPH oxidase 1 (NOX1)Preferential9
NM_001416129673eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A, isoform 1(EIF4A1)Preferential9
NM_004655127337axin 2 (conductin, axil) (AXIN2)Preferential9
NM_004442125124EphB2 (EPHB2)Preferential9
NM_000967119598ribosomal protein L3 (RPL3)Preferential8
NM_005063119597stearoyl-CoA desaturase (delta-9-desaturase) (SCD)Preferential8
NM_000090443625collagen, type III, alpha 1 (COL3A1)Preferential8
NM_012423419535ribosomal protein L13a (RPL13A)Preferential8
Preferential
NM_00602675307H1 histone family, member X (H1FX)Preferential8
NM_001923290758damage-specific DNA binding protein 1 (127kD) (DDB1)Preferential8
NM_032044105484regenerating gene type IV (REG-IV)Preferential8
NM_003258105097thymidine kinase 1, soluble (TK1)Preferential7
XM_039877102482mucin 5, subtype B, tracheobronchial (MUC5B)Preferential7
NM_005724100090tetraspan 3 (TSPAN-3)Preferential7
NM_000972416801ribosomal protein L7a (RPL7A)Preferential7
NM_01895298428homeo box B6 (HOXB6)Preferential7
NM_015925312129Similar to liver-specific bHLH-Zip transcription factorPreferential7
NM_00007595577cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4)Preferential6
NM_006408226391anterior gradient 2 homolog (Xenepus laevis) (AGR2)Preferential6
NM_004044902805-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (ATIC)Preferential6
NM_00449489525hepatoma-derived growth factor (high-mobility group protein 1-like) (HDGF)Preferential6
NM_00406389436cadherin 17, LI cadherin (liver-intestine) (CDH17)Preferential6
NM_00021385266integrin, beta 4 (ITGB4)Preferential6
NM_00173084728Kruppel-like factor 5 (intestinal) (KLF5)Preferential6
NM_00125582906CDC20 cell division cycle 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae) (CDC20)Preferential5
NM_00174782422capping protein (actin filament), gelsolin-like (CAPG)Preferential5
NM_0025344429362′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase 1 (40–46 kD) (OAS1)Preferential5
NM_00017882327glutathione synthetase (GSS)Preferential5
NM_000903406515NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, quinone 1 (NQO1)Preferential5
NM_00239479748solute carrier family 3 member 2 (SLC3A2)Preferential5
NM_00556779339lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 3 binding protein (LGALS3BP)Preferential5
NM_000404galactosidase, beta 1 (GLB1)Preferential5
NM_006907458332pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 1 (PYCR1)Preferential5
NM_00029178771phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1)Preferential5
NM_002635290404solute carrier family 25 member 3 (SLC25A3)Preferential5
NM_001640221589N-acylaminoacyl-peptide hydrolase (APEH)Preferential5
NM_005030329989polo-like kinase (Drosophila) (PLK)Preferential5
NM_00222477515inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor, type 3 (ITPR3)Preferential4
NM_00266877422proteolipid protein 2 (colonic epithelium-enriched) (PLP2)Preferential4
NM_01634377204centromere protein F (350/400kD, mitosin) (CENPF)Preferential4
NM_005916438720MCM7 minichromosome maintenance deficient 7 (S. cerevisiae) (MCM7)Preferential4
NM_001006356572ribosomal protein S3A (RPS3A)Preferential4
NM_000701371889ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, alpha 1 polypeptide (ATP1A1)Preferential4
NM_000990356542ribosomal protein L27a (RPL27A)Preferential4
NM_015379410497brain protein I3 (BRI3)Preferential4
NM_012408191990protein kinase C binding protein 1 (PRKCBP1)Preferential4
NM_00277375799protease, serine, 8 (prostasin) (PRSS8)Preferential4
NM_002951406532ribophorin II (RPN2)Preferential4
NM_001673446546asparagine synthetase (ASNS)Preferential4
NM_002862145820phosphorylase, glycogen; brain (PYGB)Preferential4
NM_000918410578procollagen-proline, 2-oxoglutarate 4-dioxygenase (P4HB)Preferential3
NM_000228436983laminin, beta 3 (nicein (125kD), kalinin (140kD), BM600 (125kD) (LAMB3)Preferential3
NM_001034226390ribonucleotide reductase M2 polypeptide (RRM2)Preferential3
NM_00321735052testis enhanced gene transcript (BAX inhibitor 1) (TEGT)Preferential3
NM_001658286221ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (ARF1)Preferential3
NM_000014alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M)Preferential3
NM_00735574335heat shock 90kD protein 1, beta (HSPCB)Preferential3
NM_001288414565chloride intracellular channel 1 (CLIC1)Preferential3
Preferential
NM_00736774111RNA binding protein (RALY)Preferential3
NM_002483436718carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6)Preferential3
NM_021220386387zinc finger protein 339 (ZNF339)Preferential3
NM_00120268879bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4)Preferential3
NM_000224406013keratin 18 (KRT18)Preferential3
NM_019894414005transmembrane protease, serine 4 (TMPRSS4)Preferential3
NM_002032448738ferritin, heavy polypeptide 1 (FTH1)Preferential3
NM_01627662863serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 2 (SGK2)Preferential3
NM_003756127149eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 3 (gamma, 40kD) (EIF3S3)Preferential3
NM_003751371001eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 9 (eta, 116kD) (EIF3S9)Preferential3
NM_00452657101MCM2 minichromosome maintenance deficient 2, (S. cerevisiae) (MCM2)Preferential3
NM_02197856937suppression of tumorigenicity 14 (colon carcinoma, epithin) (ST14)Preferential3
NM_0061871298952′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase 3 (100 kD) (OAS3)Preferential3
NM_00375355682eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 7 (zeta, 66/67kD) (EIF3S7)Preferential3
NM_001712512682carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1)Preferential3
NM_005727tetraspan 1 (TSPAN-1)Preferential3
NM_02110231439serine protease inhibitor, Kunitz type, 2 (SPINT2)Preferential3
NM_00718326557plakophilin 3 (PKP3)Preferential3
NM_00130625640claudin 3 (CLDN3)Preferential3
NM_00457225051plakophilin 2 (PKP2)Preferential3
NM_004289404741nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 3 (NFE2L3)Preferential3
NM_003627444159SLC43A1Preferential2
NM_00549818894adaptor-related protein complex 1, mu 2 subunit (AP1M2)Preferential2
NM_00555818141ladinin 1 (LAD1)Preferential2
NM_00270717883protein phosphatase 1G magnesium-dependent, gamma isoform (PPM1G)Preferential2
NM_02038416098claudin 2 (CLDN2)Preferential2
NM_00161414376actin, gamma 1 (ACTG1)Preferential2
NM_052854405961old astrocyte specifically induced substance (OASIS)Preferential2
NM_01623411638fatty-acid-Coenzyme A ligase, long-chain 5 (FACL5)Preferential2
NM_021107411125mitochondrial ribosomal protein S12 (MRPS12)Preferential2
NM_0023356347low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5)Preferential2
NM_022085430169thioredoxin related protein (MGC3178)Preferential2
NM_0330495940mucin 13, epithelial transmembrane (MUC13)Preferential2
NM_014865chromosome condensation-related SMC-associated protein 1 (CNAP1)Preferential2
NM_0060985662guanine nucleotide binding protein beta polypeptide 2-like 1 (GNB2L1)Preferential2
NM_0245265366epidermal growth factor receptor pathway related protein 3 (EPS8R3)Preferential1
NM_0061495302lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 4 (galectin 4) (LGALS4)Preferential1
NM_014275437277mannosyl (alpha-1,3-) (MGAT4B)Preferential1
NM_003752388163eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 8 (110kD) (EIF3S8)Preferential
3989plexin B2 (PLXNB2)Preferential
NM_0024472942macrophage stimulating 1 receptor (c-met-related tyrosine kinase) (MST1R)Preferential
NM_001038sodium channel, nonvoltage-gated 1 alpha (SCNN1A)Preferential
NM_0020832704glutathione peroxidase 2 (gastrointestinal) (GPX2)Preferential
NM_005186356181calpain 1, (mu/I) large subunit (CAPN1)Preferential
NM_001404256184eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma (EEF1G)Preferential
NM_003334406683ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 (UBE1)Preferential
NM_0059981708chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 3 (gamma) (CCT3)Preferential
NM_0120731600chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 5 (epsilon) (CCT5)Preferential
NM_000077421349cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (melanoma (CDKN2A)Preferential
NM_002014848FK506 binding protein 4 (59kD) (FKBP4)Preferential
NM_004502436181homeo box B7 (HOXB7)Preferential
NM_004966808heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F (HNRPF)Preferential
NM_002354692tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 1 (TACSTD1)Preferential
NM_005435334Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 5 (ARHGEF5)Preferential
NM_002457458274mucin 2, intestinal/tracheal (MUC2)Preferential
NM_000968186350ribosomal protein L4 (RPL4)Preferential
  28 in total

1.  Keratinocytes from APP/APLP2-deficient mice are impaired in proliferation, adhesion and migration in vitro.

Authors:  Christina Siemes; Thomas Quast; Christiane Kummer; Sven Wehner; Gregor Kirfel; Ulrike Müller; Volker Herzog
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Regulatory context is a crucial part of gene function.

Authors:  Sabine Fessele; Holger Maier; Christian Zischek; Peter J Nelson; Thomas Werner
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays.

Authors:  U Alon; N Barkai; D A Notterman; K Gish; S Ybarra; D Mack; A J Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interpreting expression profiles of cancers by genome-wide survey of breadth of expression in normal tissues.

Authors:  Xijin Ge; Shogo Yamamoto; Shuichi Tsutsumi; Yutaka Midorikawa; Sigeo Ihara; San Ming Wang; Hiroyuki Aburatani
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  ETV4 and Myeov knockdown impairs colon cancer cell line proliferation and invasion.

Authors:  Alan C Moss; Garrett Lawlor; David Murray; Dónal Tighe; Stephen F Madden; Anne-Marie Mulligan; Conor O Keane; Hugh R Brady; Peter P Doran; Padraic MacMathuna
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Expression profiling by microarrays in colorectal cancer (Review).

Authors:  Warren Shih; Runjan Chetty; Ming-Sound Tsao
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Molecular classification of human carcinomas by use of gene expression signatures.

Authors:  A I Su; J B Welsh; L M Sapinoso; S G Kern; P Dimitrov; H Lapp; P G Schultz; S M Powell; C A Moskaluk; H F Frierson; G M Hampton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  A human amyloid precursor-like protein is highly homologous to a mouse sequence-specific DNA-binding protein.

Authors:  H von der Kammer; J Hanes; J Klaudiny; K H Scheit
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.311

9.  OSP/claudin-11 forms a complex with a novel member of the tetraspanin super family and beta1 integrin and regulates proliferation and migration of oligodendrocytes.

Authors:  S K Tiwari-Woodruff; A G Buznikov; T Q Vu; P E Micevych; K Chen; H I Kornblum; J M Bronstein
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04-16       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Linking disease-associated genes to regulatory networks via promoter organization.

Authors:  S Döhr; A Klingenhoff; H Maier; M Hrabé de Angelis; T Werner; R Schneider
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Beta 2-microglobulin regulates amyloid precursor-like protein 2 expression and the migration of pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Bailee H Sliker; Benjamin T Goetz; Haley L Peters; Brittany J Poelaert; Gloria E O Borgstahl; Joyce C Solheim
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.742

2.  Tetraspanin 3 Is Required for the Development and Propagation of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia.

Authors:  Hyog Young Kwon; Jeevisha Bajaj; Takahiro Ito; Allen Blevins; Takaaki Konuma; Joi Weeks; Nikki K Lytle; Claire S Koechlein; David Rizzieri; Charles Chuah; Vivian G Oehler; Roman Sasik; Gary Hardiman; Tannishtha Reya
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 3.  In silico gene expression analysis--an overview.

Authors:  David Murray; Peter Doran; Padraic MacMathuna; Alan C Moss
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 4.  In silico promoters: modelling of cis-regulatory context facilitates target predictio.

Authors:  Mauritz Venter; Louise Warnich
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 5.  Amyloid precursor protein and amyloid precursor-like protein 2 in cancer.

Authors:  Poomy Pandey; Bailee Sliker; Haley L Peters; Amit Tuli; Jonathan Herskovitz; Kaitlin Smits; Abhilasha Purohit; Rakesh K Singh; Jixin Dong; Surinder K Batra; Donald W Coulter; Joyce C Solheim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-12

6.  Sex-dependent effects of amyloid precursor-like protein 2 in the SOD1-G37R transgenic mouse model of MND.

Authors:  Phan H Truong; Peter J Crouch; James B W Hilton; Catriona A McLean; Roberto Cappai; Giuseppe D Ciccotosto
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 9.261

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.